Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100111

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100111 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.49% of octets and 20.88% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.09M
5 1.490M 6 10.48M
10 1.602M 12 10.95M
50 3.427M 57 17.75M
90 19.30M 59 54.79M
95 34.75M 59 85.96M
99 103.2M 59 213.7M
99.9 318.4M 59 707.1M
99.99 843.3M 59 2.061G
99.999 1.345G 118 4.754G
100 29.67G 119 11.56G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.52% 6.140G
Medium (100-1400B)8.66% 34.88G
Large (1401-1500B)89.72% 361.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 382.3M
Total100.00% 402.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.43% 174.8T 30.28% 121.9G 39.31% 7.280M
Encrypted Traffic6.81% 39.13T 6.96% 28.02G 4.76% 880.7k
File Sharing3.32% 19.06T 3.28% 13.21G 2.27% 420.4k
Advanced Apps2.77% 15.94T 2.76% 11.11G 3.46% 640.9k
Measurement2.44% 14.02T 2.60% 10.47G 0.25% 46.27k
Misc0.70% 4.022T 0.72% 2.901G 1.14% 212.0k
Games0.14% 818.4G 0.14% 575.7M 0.19% 35.87k
Audio/Video0.09% 537.2G 0.09% 378.2M 0.20% 37.15k
Unidentified53.30% 306.2T 53.17% 214.1G 48.41% 8.966M
Total100.00% 574.7T 100.00% 402.7G 100.00% 18.52M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.782G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.665G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.355G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.049G900018Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.043G900029UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]Iperf
993.2M150011Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
985.6M150016Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
983.2M150017UNL [7896]UIUC [38]Iperf
980.7M150018UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
980.5M146410INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.401G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5079 -> 5079
1.330G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5061 -> 5061
967.6M150053Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]55712 -> 5950
942.5M150013UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5018 -> 5018
941.8M146020Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5012 -> 5012
863.2M146425Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
827.2M149120Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011
807.6M146411Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5015 -> 5015
774.7M146411VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5015 -> 5015
774.0M146416Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]VANDERBILT [7212]5012 -> 5012

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.421k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.63% 619.2T 45.85% 884.4G
Encrypted Traffic6.96% 98.81T 7.55% 145.5G
File Sharing1.90% 26.91T 1.46% 28.14G
Advanced Apps1.82% 25.88T 1.51% 29.21G
Misc1.73% 24.58T 3.65% 70.41G
Measurement1.15% 16.31T 0.99% 19.01G
Audio/Video0.68% 9.596T 0.56% 10.76G
Games0.25% 3.567T 0.42% 8.049G
Unidentified41.88% 594.3T 38.02% 733.4G
Total100.00% 1.419P 100.00% 1.929T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.86%
0.97%
0.56%
0.24%
---
594.1T
13.76T
7.897T
3.437T
---
44.25%
0.73%
0.52%
0.35%
---
853.6G
14.09G
10.02G
6.662G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.91%
2.62%
1.42%
0.01%
0.00%
---
41.23T
37.24T
20.21T
96.68G
10.86G
---
4.01%
2.26%
1.26%
0.01%
0.00%
---
77.30G
43.69G
24.31G
228.4M
49.47M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Neo-Modus
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
1.06%
0.51%
0.19%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.00T
7.261T
2.659T
1.270T
434.1G
102.2G
86.26G
46.32G
28.51G
7.575G
7.462G
1.793G
159.6M
---
0.77%
0.33%
0.22%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.85G
6.444G
4.332G
1.561G
517.4M
174.7M
125.0M
62.00M
24.87M
12.06M
16.20M
23.10M
171.6k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.62%
0.12%
0.08%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.98T
1.717T
1.108T
48.68G
14.71G
983.1M
---
1.37%
0.07%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.45G
1.372G
1.200G
122.5M
63.62M
1.917M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
AOL AIM
SNMP
SOCKS
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.16%
0.12%
0.11%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.86T
2.249T
1.635T
1.587T
951.9G
365.4G
290.0G
243.9G
138.3G
76.22G
64.41G
40.00G
31.61G
23.45G
23.05G
3.687G
396.1M
---
1.80%
0.91%
0.11%
0.13%
0.07%
0.33%
0.04%
0.16%
0.03%
0.04%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
34.63G
17.48G
2.178G
2.538G
1.314G
6.410G
713.9M
3.176G
540.6M
717.7M
101.0M
297.3M
43.92M
166.3M
45.98M
46.40M
2.258M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.09%
0.06%
0.00%
---
15.46T
842.7G
0.000
---
0.71%
0.28%
0.00%
---
13.69G
5.326G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.42%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.009T
3.139T
275.5G
64.28G
62.34G
26.26G
12.86G
6.947G
0.000
---
0.32%
0.21%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.139G
4.113G
280.8M
79.94M
86.38M
31.96M
21.08M
13.47M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Spy Arcade
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.17%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.411T
427.0G
408.1G
200.9G
50.92G
47.66G
21.54G
---
0.19%
0.05%
0.14%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.597G
997.4M
2.686G
411.9M
171.8M
128.7M
55.71M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.88%
---
594.3T
---
38.02%
---
733.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.419P
---
100.00%
---
1.929T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 842.7G 0.28% 5.326G
IGMP[2]0.00% 71.25M 0.00% 1.925M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 204.8G 0.01% 169.1M
TCP[6]91.08% 1.292P 87.42% 1.686T
UDP[17]6.81% 96.70T 10.54% 203.2G
IPv6[41]0.05% 646.6G 0.06% 1.185G
GRE[47]0.50% 7.150T 0.35% 6.799G
ESP[50]1.42% 20.21T 1.26% 24.31G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.01% 96.28G 0.01% 234.6M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.05% 671.6G 0.07% 1.284G
Total100.00% 1.419P 100.00% 1.929T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.08% 811.8G
Medium (100-1400B)18.58% 358.4G
Large (1401-1500B)39.19% 756.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 2.780G
Total100.00% 1.929T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.84% 1.374P 97.10% 1.873T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 2.275T 0.14% 2.660G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 98.87G 0.02% 387.9M
Other2.99% 42.50T 2.74% 52.90G
Total100.00% 1.419P 100.00% 1.929T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.61% 8.601T 0.32% 6.131G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19355.36% 76.00T 5.28% 101.8G
330011.37% 19.49T 0.69% 13.38G
150000.69% 9.817T 0.66% 12.67G
600110.64% 9.081T 0.53% 10.18G
200000.57% 8.070T 0.40% 7.744G