Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20100104

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20100104 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.66% of octets and 23.38% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.398M 1 10.10M
5 1.505M 4 10.50M
10 1.635M 9 11.07M
50 3.982M 57 18.59M
90 24.40M 59 63.09M
95 45.74M 59 98.70M
99 121.4M 59 206.5M
99.9 278.5M 59 629.5M
99.99 767.3M 59 1.874G
99.999 1.524G 60 2.845G
100 17.56G 63 12.28G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.40% 5.036G
Medium (100-1400B)8.00% 28.84G
Large (1401-1500B)90.56% 326.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 133.7M
Total100.00% 360.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.47% 146.5T 28.55% 102.9G 36.51% 5.740M
Encrypted Traffic7.54% 38.77T 7.74% 27.89G 5.61% 882.6k
File Sharing3.31% 17.03T 3.27% 11.77G 2.43% 381.8k
Advanced Apps3.12% 16.07T 3.10% 11.18G 4.04% 635.0k
Measurement1.84% 9.475T 2.18% 7.843G 0.22% 34.75k
Misc0.71% 3.630T 0.72% 2.600G 1.23% 193.0k
Games0.16% 808.5G 0.16% 576.1M 0.20% 31.23k
Audio/Video0.08% 387.3G 0.08% 271.7M 0.17% 27.17k
Unidentified54.78% 281.9T 54.21% 195.4G 49.59% 7.796M
Total100.00% 514.5T 100.00% 360.4G 100.00% 15.72M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.965G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.710G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.043G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.038G900020UC Santa Cruz [5739]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.008G900020UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.001G150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
997.8M150011Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
989.2M150018UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf
980.4M900020UIUC [38]Argonne [683]Iperf
974.0M150015Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.409G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5070 -> 5070
1.371G146414Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5067 -> 5067
948.6M146119Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]SDSC [195]5013 -> 5013
929.0M150016UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
890.1M148320Unknown [32361]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5014 -> 5014
868.7M150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]43906 -> 23671
807.9M146411Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]Unknown [32361]5017 -> 5017
779.3M146411VANDERBILT [7212]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5016 -> 5016
762.0M146420Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5013 -> 5013
741.8M150012Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]45346 -> 47974

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.163k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.48% 466.4T 43.14% 665.3G
Encrypted Traffic7.03% 81.04T 7.97% 122.9G
Advanced Apps2.23% 25.72T 1.89% 29.22G
File Sharing2.09% 24.08T 1.75% 26.93G
Misc1.91% 21.97T 4.32% 66.55G
Measurement1.32% 15.22T 1.22% 18.79G
Audio/Video0.58% 6.640T 0.59% 9.084G
Games0.24% 2.800T 0.35% 5.345G
Unidentified44.12% 508.3T 38.77% 597.9G
Total100.00% 1.152P 100.00% 1.542T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.47%
0.97%
0.70%
0.33%
---
443.3T
11.21T
8.072T
3.852T
---
41.43%
0.74%
0.59%
0.38%
---
638.8G
11.40G
9.144G
5.919G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.20%
3.07%
0.75%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.91T
35.37T
8.660T
91.72G
10.55G
---
2.94%
4.24%
0.77%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.38G
65.43G
11.86G
208.4M
49.28M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.96%
0.15%
0.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.57T
1.744T
1.335T
47.90G
18.63G
376.7M
---
1.67%
0.09%
0.12%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.74G
1.443G
1.838G
122.6M
69.51M
1.289M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
1.23%
0.51%
0.23%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.11T
5.905T
2.596T
868.4G
414.1G
77.32G
55.81G
35.90G
7.567G
2.393G
1.976G
1.227G
16.79M
---
0.90%
0.34%
0.38%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.82G
5.259G
5.803G
1.242G
496.1M
116.0M
105.1M
52.83M
12.12M
2.778M
6.336M
12.93M
66.90k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.32%
0.18%
0.14%
0.09%
0.06%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.25T
2.097T
1.599T
1.059T
694.3G
359.6G
303.4G
274.4G
118.2G
67.36G
49.15G
30.59G
30.40G
21.93G
7.506G
5.487G
819.5M
---
2.10%
1.08%
0.16%
0.09%
0.08%
0.42%
0.05%
0.23%
0.03%
0.04%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.43G
16.62G
2.522G
1.311G
1.203G
6.475G
726.8M
3.609G
432.7M
614.1M
88.21M
249.0M
52.46M
156.3M
10.28M
39.47M
2.733M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.92%
0.40%
0.00%
---
10.62T
4.594T
0.000
---
0.69%
0.53%
0.00%
---
10.65G
8.141G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.32%
0.22%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.671T
2.558T
253.7G
61.59G
51.03G
28.99G
11.87G
2.999G
0.000
---
0.33%
0.23%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.025G
3.599G
256.9M
71.62M
68.01M
35.59M
20.26M
7.253M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.18%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.030T
369.6G
194.7G
135.8G
27.98G
22.55G
19.47G
---
0.18%
0.05%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.797G
709.9M
1.367G
273.1M
65.58M
60.18M
71.54M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
44.12%
---
508.3T
---
38.77%
---
597.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.152P
---
100.00%
---
1.542T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.40% 4.594T 0.53% 8.141G
IGMP[2]0.00% 69.14M 0.00% 1.866M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 230.1G 0.01% 183.9M
TCP[6]91.35% 1.052P 87.84% 1.354T
UDP[17]6.17% 71.06T 9.92% 152.9G
IPv6[41]0.04% 408.6G 0.06% 850.7M
GRE[47]1.24% 14.29T 0.81% 12.53G
ESP[50]0.75% 8.660T 0.77% 11.86G
AX.25[93]0.00% 46.20k 0.00% 700.0
PIM[103]0.01% 132.4G 0.02% 299.6M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 294.7G 0.04% 659.5M
Total100.00% 1.152P 100.00% 1.542T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.81% 644.8G
Medium (100-1400B)17.70% 272.9G
Large (1401-1500B)40.00% 616.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.48% 7.465G
Total100.00% 1.542T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.76% 1.115P 96.86% 1.493T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.696T 0.13% 1.961G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 88.15G 0.02% 326.9M
Other3.08% 35.54T 3.00% 46.19G
Total100.00% 1.152P 100.00% 1.542T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.56% 6.484T 0.30% 4.703G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.35% 50.14T 4.37% 67.35G
330011.14% 13.14T 0.59% 9.039G
200000.89% 10.26T 0.66% 10.11G
600110.85% 9.852T 0.70% 10.84G
150000.75% 8.662T 0.73% 11.22G