Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091207

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091207 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.70% of octets and 17.80% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.08M
5 1.486M 7 10.39M
10 1.594M 14 10.92M
50 3.256M 57 17.42M
90 15.66M 59 52.38M
95 28.01M 59 79.65M
99 85.13M 59 194.2M
99.9 202.6M 59 564.4M
99.99 499.0M 59 1.872G
99.999 928.3M 116 3.696G
100 28.73G 117 11.37G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.20% 4.686G
Medium (100-1400B)8.55% 33.35G
Large (1401-1500B)90.24% 351.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 31.29M
Total100.00% 390.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.82% 188.2T 33.79% 131.7G 39.04% 7.439M
Encrypted Traffic8.55% 47.55T 8.81% 34.38G 5.70% 1.086M
Advanced Apps3.35% 18.65T 3.32% 12.94G 4.36% 831.4k
File Sharing3.07% 17.10T 3.03% 11.81G 2.17% 412.9k
Measurement1.22% 6.790T 1.44% 5.606G 0.32% 61.02k
Misc0.70% 3.913T 0.71% 2.788G 1.06% 201.5k
Games0.21% 1.146T 0.22% 864.1M 0.23% 43.29k
Audio/Video0.10% 567.9G 0.10% 397.0M 0.20% 38.57k
Unidentified48.97% 272.4T 48.57% 189.4G 46.92% 8.940M
Total100.00% 556.4T 100.00% 390.0G 100.00% 19.05M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.695G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
2.439G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.004G900019UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
995.4M146912Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
976.7M150014Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
974.6M150020Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
965.6M146413INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
949.8M150015UNL [7896]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Iperf
948.1M150011Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
944.1M150020UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
978.5M147317Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5017 -> 5017
783.1M150015Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]46638 -> 51412
750.5M150012Unknown [32361]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]42174 -> 56605
688.9M149519Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]5017 -> 5017
639.8M146414Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Stephen F. Austin State U [3634]5011 -> 5011
628.6M150028U Wisconsin [59]UNL [7896]36205 -> 39235
609.5M150045Argonne [683]Unknown [40623]38010 -> 5484
576.1M146460Nat Lib Med [70]Yale [29]50460 -> 42432
564.4M150038U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]38752 -> 40279
504.7M150034Unknown [32440]UCAR [194]Audiogalaxy

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.491k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.92% 768.3T 48.91% 1.071T
Encrypted Traffic6.48% 103.8T 6.96% 152.5G
Advanced Apps1.84% 29.54T 1.42% 31.13G
File Sharing1.61% 25.84T 1.28% 27.95G
Misc1.49% 23.81T 3.21% 70.44G
Measurement0.56% 9.016T 0.65% 14.14G
Audio/Video0.50% 8.050T 0.47% 10.29G
Games0.29% 4.704T 0.51% 11.23G
Unidentified39.30% 630.1T 36.59% 801.7G
Total100.00% 1.603P 100.00% 2.191T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
45.90%
1.21%
0.63%
0.18%
---
735.9T
19.43T
10.10T
2.842T
---
47.26%
0.89%
0.48%
0.27%
---
1.035T
19.50G
10.55G
5.927G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.99%
2.62%
0.87%
0.01%
0.00%
---
47.88T
42.03T
13.87T
90.53G
11.67G
---
2.37%
3.75%
0.84%
0.01%
0.00%
---
51.84G
82.14G
18.33G
212.3M
51.68M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.65%
0.11%
0.08%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.41T
1.753T
1.312T
47.53G
12.95G
1.700G
---
1.29%
0.06%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.33G
1.380G
1.247G
112.5M
59.40M
2.956M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.90%
0.40%
0.17%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.41T
6.354T
2.715T
1.563T
473.7G
121.8G
110.4G
48.64G
24.26G
8.423G
2.326G
892.4M
8.984M
---
0.67%
0.26%
0.21%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.70G
5.593G
4.590G
1.927G
569.3M
168.3M
227.7M
70.04M
63.16M
9.579M
29.30M
2.496M
103.8k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
Telnet
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.06%
0.13%
0.11%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.99T
2.144T
1.687T
949.3G
756.4G
418.0G
295.0G
249.4G
100.0G
65.23G
62.09G
24.20G
21.54G
20.82G
19.13G
15.87G
523.5M
---
1.50%
0.85%
0.13%
0.09%
0.05%
0.33%
0.05%
0.15%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.79G
18.64G
2.786G
1.912G
1.169G
7.242G
1.002G
3.281G
393.4M
633.8M
130.5M
44.94M
66.39M
147.0M
170.3M
23.99M
2.826M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.53%
0.04%
0.00%
---
8.446T
569.9G
0.000
---
0.42%
0.23%
0.00%
---
9.102G
5.043G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.25%
0.21%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.079T
3.403T
327.7G
114.5G
71.09G
29.74G
19.49G
5.085G
0.000
---
0.24%
0.20%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.193G
4.435G
338.2M
142.8M
96.13M
40.19M
36.81M
11.41M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.18%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.946T
736.3G
562.3G
220.6G
131.7G
73.99G
33.44G
---
0.19%
0.07%
0.18%
0.03%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.249G
1.551G
3.853G
548.2M
767.6M
174.3M
87.29M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.30%
---
630.1T
---
36.59%
---
801.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.603P
---
100.00%
---
2.191T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 569.9G 0.23% 5.043G
IGMP[2]0.00% 69.84M 0.00% 1.888M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 171.6G 0.01% 147.4M
TCP[6]91.63% 1.469P 87.88% 1.925T
UDP[17]6.66% 106.7T 10.41% 227.9G
IPv6[41]0.05% 755.2G 0.06% 1.286G
GRE[47]0.73% 11.65T 0.54% 11.83G
ESP[50]0.87% 13.87T 0.84% 18.33G
AX.25[93]0.00% 46.20k 0.00% 700.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.773G 0.00% 64.01M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 428.0G 0.04% 836.8M
Total100.00% 1.603P 100.00% 2.191T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.75% 914.7G
Medium (100-1400B)19.08% 418.0G
Large (1401-1500B)38.97% 853.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.20% 4.430G
Total100.00% 2.191T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.95% 1.554P 97.20% 2.129T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 2.134T 0.19% 4.156G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 77.01G 0.02% 338.8M
Other2.91% 46.67T 2.59% 56.80G
Total100.00% 1.603P 100.00% 2.191T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.26% 4.207T 0.14% 3.107G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19357.70% 123.4T 7.02% 153.8G
164020.85% 13.70T 0.77% 16.89G
600110.78% 12.53T 0.61% 13.40G
330010.71% 11.36T 0.36% 7.808G
200000.67% 10.74T 0.48% 10.53G