Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091123

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091123 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.61% of octets and 21.65% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.10M
5 1.496M 7 10.50M
10 1.617M 14 11.07M
50 3.319M 58 18.27M
90 16.66M 59 54.60M
95 31.34M 59 80.95M
99 85.46M 59 209.1M
99.9 214.7M 59 578.4M
99.99 513.0M 59 1.726G
99.999 922.0M 60 2.777G
100 12.88G 63 5.818G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.85% 2.825G
Medium (100-1400B)8.35% 27.75G
Large (1401-1500B)90.78% 301.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 49.45M
Total100.00% 332.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.08% 148.1T 31.05% 103.1G 36.20% 5.693M
Encrypted Traffic7.87% 37.52T 8.17% 27.15G 6.16% 968.9k
Advanced Apps3.77% 17.97T 3.76% 12.48G 5.22% 820.5k
File Sharing3.39% 16.15T 3.35% 11.12G 2.41% 378.9k
Measurement1.85% 8.812T 2.10% 6.964G 0.32% 50.36k
Misc0.64% 3.052T 0.70% 2.320G 1.02% 160.0k
Games0.18% 854.6G 0.18% 604.1M 0.23% 36.60k
Audio/Video0.10% 484.4G 0.10% 339.1M 0.22% 34.36k
Unidentified51.13% 243.7T 50.60% 168.1G 48.22% 7.582M
Total100.00% 476.8T 100.00% 332.2G 100.00% 15.72M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.013G150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
993.1M150018UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf
984.9M150020UIUC [38]U Chicago [160]Iperf
979.3M150013Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
957.0M146420INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
950.8M146412Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
910.2M150010UNL [7896]Purdue [17]Iperf
903.1M150020Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
902.3M150020UNL [7896]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Iperf
883.1M146421Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
754.7M150022Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]52646 -> 34584
706.6M150012Unknown [32361]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]46760 -> 38701
643.0M150014U Wisconsin [59]UNL [7896]35694 -> 56162
605.6M150032U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]46215 -> 56905
571.1M150012U Wisconsin [59]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]56923 -> 37731
534.0M146410Abilene [11537]Unknown [0]Rsync
494.0M146422MIT [3]UNL [7896]48788 -> 34107
492.5M142021Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50077 -> 54840
486.4M150012UNL [7896]U Florida [6356]43433 -> 49383
479.5M150012Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]53643 -> 20805

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.245k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.65% 488.7T 42.91% 658.5G
Encrypted Traffic7.57% 86.74T 7.68% 117.8G
Advanced Apps2.51% 28.81T 2.01% 30.81G
File Sharing2.02% 23.19T 1.62% 24.87G
Misc1.63% 18.73T 4.04% 61.94G
Measurement0.90% 10.31T 0.92% 14.17G
Audio/Video0.48% 5.492T 0.43% 6.624G
Games0.28% 3.153T 0.43% 6.610G
Unidentified41.96% 480.8T 39.96% 613.2G
Total100.00% 1.145P 100.00% 1.534T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.24%
1.63%
0.53%
0.24%
---
461.1T
18.70T
6.073T
2.792T
---
40.89%
1.18%
0.49%
0.36%
---
627.4G
18.16G
7.463G
5.456G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.27%
2.64%
1.66%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.45T
30.22T
18.98T
64.17G
10.86G
---
2.78%
3.41%
1.47%
0.01%
0.00%
---
42.61G
52.36G
22.62G
173.1M
50.08M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.26%
0.19%
0.06%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.89T
2.157T
705.1G
43.71G
15.89G
1.971G
---
1.83%
0.11%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.11G
1.760G
759.7M
109.4M
65.51M
9.294M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.10%
0.57%
0.17%
0.12%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.57T
6.578T
1.951T
1.392T
474.5G
89.29G
80.11G
32.57G
16.43G
2.795G
2.021G
1.729G
26.29M
---
0.86%
0.38%
0.22%
0.10%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.12G
5.818G
3.380G
1.608G
558.7M
157.6M
113.5M
56.79M
27.43M
4.666M
19.53M
2.646M
113.1k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
MS Windows
Port 0
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
SOCKS
SNMP
Telnet
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.10%
0.17%
0.15%
0.09%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.56T
1.964T
1.768T
1.001T
406.1G
321.7G
261.5G
179.4G
64.21G
63.12G
54.39G
24.24G
21.41G
20.14G
9.192G
7.359G
1.264G
---
1.75%
1.01%
0.27%
0.10%
0.48%
0.07%
0.22%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.86G
15.50G
4.104G
1.507G
7.358G
999.2M
3.435G
611.8M
623.7M
232.4M
243.4M
46.30M
150.0M
204.3M
39.07M
12.79M
3.208M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.85%
0.05%
0.00%
---
9.724T
589.7G
0.000
---
0.64%
0.29%
0.00%
---
9.758G
4.413G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.23%
0.20%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.689T
2.337T
292.2G
67.01G
59.31G
23.31G
17.35G
5.806G
0.000
---
0.22%
0.17%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.444G
2.644G
278.4M
95.69M
79.56M
41.20M
28.61M
11.54M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
Spy Arcade
---
0.19%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.153T
388.1G
300.3G
209.1G
45.74G
38.90G
17.88G
---
0.20%
0.05%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.061G
813.1M
1.931G
461.1M
222.9M
77.58M
43.32M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.96%
---
480.8T
---
39.96%
---
613.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.145P
---
100.00%
---
1.534T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 589.7G 0.29% 4.413G
IGMP[2]0.00% 70.53M 0.00% 1.909M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 131.3G 0.01% 108.1M
TCP[6]90.60% 1.038P 86.44% 1.326T
UDP[17]6.69% 76.61T 11.05% 169.5G
IPv6[41]0.03% 385.2G 0.05% 701.4M
GRE[47]0.94% 10.74T 0.65% 10.02G
ESP[50]1.66% 18.98T 1.47% 22.62G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.831G 0.00% 64.02M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 241.3G 0.04% 550.4M
Total100.00% 1.145P 100.00% 1.534T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.19% 632.0G
Medium (100-1400B)19.07% 292.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.45% 605.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.29% 4.408G
Total100.00% 1.534T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.16% 1.101P 96.55% 1.481T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 1.520T 0.19% 2.874G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 44.81G 0.01% 210.1M
Other3.70% 42.43T 3.25% 49.93G
Total100.00% 1.145P 100.00% 1.534T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.40% 4.529T 0.22% 3.348G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19353.40% 38.93T 4.17% 64.03G
600111.07% 12.30T 0.84% 12.92G
150000.90% 10.34T 0.92% 14.18G
200000.66% 7.531T 0.48% 7.416G
45000.37% 4.244T 0.34% 5.148G