Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091116

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091116 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.76% of octets and 18.27% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.08M
5 1.488M 8 10.44M
10 1.597M 15 10.94M
50 3.183M 57 17.55M
90 15.46M 59 51.30M
95 28.26M 59 80.36M
99 86.13M 59 215.4M
99.9 204.7M 59 645.8M
99.99 553.8M 60 1.676G
99.999 1.283G 115 3.209G
100 23.92G 116 43.75G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.67% 6.711G
Medium (100-1400B)9.66% 38.71G
Large (1401-1500B)88.57% 354.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 398.6M
Total100.00% 400.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.40% 185.3T 32.25% 129.2G 39.97% 7.675M
Encrypted Traffic7.14% 40.87T 7.84% 31.44G 5.92% 1.135M
Advanced Apps4.35% 24.87T 4.61% 18.45G 5.17% 992.8k
Measurement3.87% 22.16T 3.79% 15.17G 0.64% 123.3k
File Sharing3.07% 17.54T 3.01% 12.08G 2.15% 413.0k
Misc0.79% 4.519T 0.82% 3.297G 1.21% 232.6k
Games0.15% 870.1G 0.15% 620.7M 0.20% 38.49k
Audio/Video0.11% 624.4G 0.11% 435.6M 0.23% 43.36k
Unidentified48.12% 275.3T 47.42% 190.0G 44.51% 8.547M
Total100.00% 572.2T 100.00% 400.7G 100.00% 19.20M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
9.083G900020SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.417G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.628G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.347G146412Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.313G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.027G150013Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]Iperf
965.9M899720UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
964.3M150013UIUC [38]Boston U [111]Iperf
960.8M150020UIUC [38]U Chicago [160]Iperf
948.5M146418INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.503G900020SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]5018 -> 5018
1.416G146413Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5034 -> 5034
1.314G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5079 -> 5079
976.7M147719Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5016 -> 5016
964.6M150020Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]5010 -> 5010
943.1M146459Abilene [11537]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Shoutcast
922.7M150036Unknown [32361]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]37842 -> 49156
835.1M900020UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5018 -> 5018
735.7M150012Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]48560 -> 52065
697.4M150027U Wisconsin [59]UNL [7896]51216 -> 46094

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.518k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.09% 753.4T 47.83% 1.049T
Encrypted Traffic5.87% 93.91T 6.50% 142.6G
Advanced Apps2.31% 36.97T 1.97% 43.20G
File Sharing1.65% 26.40T 1.31% 28.74G
Misc1.62% 25.90T 3.34% 73.37G
Measurement1.56% 24.89T 1.15% 25.21G
Audio/Video0.43% 6.902T 0.38% 8.443G
Games0.32% 5.134T 0.49% 10.74G
Unidentified39.15% 626.3T 37.02% 812.2G
Total100.00% 1.599P 100.00% 2.194T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
45.16%
1.22%
0.45%
0.26%
---
722.5T
19.56T
7.211T
4.084T
---
46.23%
0.88%
0.41%
0.31%
---
1.014T
19.29G
8.903G
6.881G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.59%
2.49%
0.78%
0.01%
0.00%
---
41.46T
39.88T
12.46T
91.22G
14.59G
---
3.50%
2.24%
0.74%
0.01%
0.00%
---
76.88G
49.22G
16.28G
220.2M
61.02M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.61%
0.44%
0.13%
0.13%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.81T
6.995T
2.071T
2.034T
45.89G
16.03G
---
1.27%
0.51%
0.10%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.93G
11.29G
2.173G
1.628G
103.1M
67.52M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.90%
0.38%
0.17%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.38T
6.114T
2.699T
2.351T
526.1G
172.6G
101.4G
38.33G
9.412G
7.566G
4.055G
1.188G
66.90M
---
0.68%
0.25%
0.21%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.87G
5.379G
4.626G
2.598G
657.0M
321.9M
149.3M
62.22M
11.12M
12.91M
48.24M
3.032M
118.7k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
IDENT
RTIP
NFS
IRC
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.12%
0.14%
0.12%
0.09%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.93T
2.211T
1.909T
1.378T
1.057T
556.1G
248.6G
230.4G
82.20G
78.96G
60.10G
54.62G
30.70G
27.83G
22.07G
16.64G
815.1M
---
1.57%
0.82%
0.18%
0.08%
0.08%
0.36%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
34.47G
18.04G
3.980G
1.670G
1.671G
7.931G
3.268G
691.0M
111.8M
778.4M
121.8M
212.1M
53.66M
189.2M
152.1M
25.82M
2.930M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.51%
0.05%
0.00%
---
24.17T
721.5G
0.000
---
0.88%
0.26%
0.00%
---
19.41G
5.795G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.27%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.248T
2.022T
417.2G
86.35G
81.64G
23.81G
15.54G
6.083G
39.60k
---
0.25%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.394G
2.325G
406.7M
120.7M
111.1M
40.63M
29.98M
14.01M
600.0
Games
DirectX
Asheron
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.06%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.717T
889.7G
556.8G
554.9G
321.3G
68.13G
26.24G
---
0.19%
0.03%
0.17%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.160G
603.9M
3.631G
1.275G
725.8M
272.6M
75.44M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.15%
---
626.3T
---
37.02%
---
812.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.599P
---
100.00%
---
2.194T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 721.5G 0.26% 5.795G
IGMP[2]0.00% 69.24M 0.00% 1.871M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 226.0G 0.01% 185.3M
TCP[6]89.69% 1.435P 86.77% 1.903T
UDP[17]8.68% 138.9T 11.57% 253.8G
IPv6[41]0.04% 560.1G 0.05% 1.084G
GRE[47]0.56% 8.894T 0.45% 9.908G
ESP[50]0.78% 12.46T 0.74% 16.28G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.680G 0.00% 60.98M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.19% 3.080T 0.14% 2.977G
Total100.00% 1.599P 100.00% 2.194T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.96% 920.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.09% 440.6G
Large (1401-1500B)37.72% 827.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.23% 5.004G
Total100.00% 2.194T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.31% 1.540P 97.18% 2.132T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.18% 2.809T 0.21% 4.630G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 66.48G 0.01% 314.3M
Other3.51% 56.22T 2.59% 56.88G
Total100.00% 1.599P 100.00% 2.194T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.96% 15.40T 0.20% 4.445G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.56% 72.98T 5.27% 115.6G
330011.17% 18.75T 0.59% 12.85G
164021.04% 16.69T 0.93% 20.37G
330020.97% 15.45T 0.48% 10.58G
150000.73% 11.70T 0.73% 16.08G