Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091102

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091102 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.89% of octets and 18.17% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 1 10.08M
5 1.490M 7 10.46M
10 1.601M 14 10.95M
50 3.209M 57 17.70M
90 16.25M 59 53.73M
95 30.57M 59 82.13M
99 85.04M 59 203.7M
99.9 180.1M 59 606.9M
99.99 643.2M 59 1.630G
99.999 2.453G 111 6.830G
100 190.8G 119 38.63G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.27% 8.960G
Medium (100-1400B)10.22% 40.34G
Large (1401-1500B)87.39% 344.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.12% 477.6M
Total100.00% 394.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.04% 179.3T 31.81% 125.5G 40.71% 7.588M
Encrypted Traffic7.98% 44.65T 9.03% 35.64G 5.38% 1.003M
Advanced Apps3.40% 19.05T 3.56% 14.04G 3.85% 717.7k
File Sharing3.08% 17.25T 3.03% 11.94G 2.20% 409.3k
Measurement2.55% 14.25T 2.45% 9.666G 0.37% 68.33k
Misc0.81% 4.530T 0.83% 3.281G 1.25% 233.6k
Games0.17% 963.4G 0.17% 686.6M 0.22% 40.61k
Audio/Video0.12% 659.7G 0.12% 464.4M 0.25% 45.89k
Unidentified49.84% 278.9T 49.00% 193.3G 45.77% 8.530M
Total100.00% 559.6T 100.00% 394.6G 100.00% 18.63M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
9.252G900020SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.748G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.023G900037APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Iperf
3.533G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.472G150016Unknown [32361]PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [10052]Iperf
1.325G146415Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.290G146411Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.108G146413Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.010G900020UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
986.6M150013Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.442G900020SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]5016 -> 5016
5.158G900060APAN-JP [7660]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]51990 -> 9600
1.413G146420Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5035 -> 5035
1.345G146419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]BBCP
992.9M900012UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5019 -> 5019
991.5M150015Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]5019 -> 5019
983.8M146411Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
976.9M147415Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5018 -> 5018
944.8M146459Abilene [11537]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Shoutcast
866.2M150010USD [11736]Abilene [11537]34872 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.473k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.18% 735.7T 47.91% 1.040T
Encrypted Traffic6.63% 103.3T 6.90% 149.7G
Advanced Apps1.90% 29.69T 1.55% 33.70G
Misc1.73% 26.90T 3.74% 81.15G
File Sharing1.65% 25.67T 1.32% 28.66G
Measurement1.06% 16.54T 0.91% 19.67G
Audio/Video0.55% 8.615T 0.46% 9.901G
Games0.28% 4.303T 0.49% 10.62G
Unidentified39.02% 608.4T 36.73% 797.5G
Total100.00% 1.559P 100.00% 2.171T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
44.93%
1.20%
0.53%
0.53%
---
700.5T
18.70T
8.250T
8.186T
---
46.19%
0.80%
0.44%
0.47%
---
1.002T
17.46G
9.469G
10.25G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.76%
2.63%
1.24%
0.01%
0.00%
---
42.98T
41.00T
19.25T
88.31G
14.72G
---
2.41%
3.47%
1.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
52.23G
75.32G
21.91G
210.4M
60.05M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.47%
0.25%
0.13%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.90T
3.899T
2.003T
798.2G
47.33G
42.11G
---
1.16%
0.28%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.10G
5.986G
1.635G
772.4M
110.2M
94.64M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
MS Windows
NTP
AFS
RTIP
IRC
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.23%
0.15%
0.14%
0.07%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.23T
2.375T
2.179T
1.048T
810.3G
395.0G
236.1G
222.9G
106.7G
89.83G
76.29G
35.25G
27.72G
25.19G
23.38G
21.55G
416.1M
---
1.76%
1.05%
0.17%
0.07%
0.09%
0.32%
0.14%
0.03%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
38.22G
22.87G
3.643G
1.575G
1.881G
6.957G
3.087G
630.5M
1.175G
409.1M
137.4M
249.4M
51.47M
38.11M
62.55M
153.0M
3.575M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.90%
0.38%
0.19%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.02T
5.956T
3.002T
1.888T
490.7G
138.0G
118.0G
35.09G
7.550G
3.905G
2.299G
1.038G
326.5M
---
0.68%
0.24%
0.23%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.83G
5.274G
5.096G
2.247G
616.0M
304.9M
169.8M
54.06M
13.65M
46.40M
3.752M
3.147M
312.1k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.02%
0.04%
0.00%
---
15.93T
611.8G
936.4k
---
0.64%
0.27%
0.00%
---
13.79G
5.878G
700.0
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
Subset of VoIP
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.32%
0.19%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.027T
2.912T
393.0G
94.63G
90.26G
51.51G
27.40G
18.60G
0.000
---
0.29%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.230G
2.922G
382.6M
127.0M
122.9M
44.20M
41.51M
30.36M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.635T
615.9G
611.6G
277.3G
92.78G
40.77G
29.37G
---
0.19%
0.19%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
4.087G
4.032G
1.423G
692.0M
164.7M
84.48M
141.6M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.02%
---
608.4T
---
36.73%
---
797.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.559P
---
100.00%
---
2.171T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 611.8G 0.27% 5.878G
IGMP[2]0.00% 70.90M 0.00% 1.890M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 197.2G 0.01% 163.5M
TCP[6]89.64% 1.397P 86.54% 1.879T
UDP[17]7.72% 120.3T 11.40% 247.5G
IPv6[41]0.04% 581.3G 0.05% 1.007G
GRE[47]0.85% 13.21T 0.53% 11.45G
ESP[50]1.24% 19.25T 1.01% 21.91G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.660M 0.00% 2.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.379G 0.00% 56.54M
IPMP[169]0.00% 936.4k 0.00% 700.0
Other0.47% 7.312T 0.19% 4.196G
Total100.00% 1.559P 100.00% 2.171T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.74% 928.0G
Medium (100-1400B)20.30% 440.8G
Large (1401-1500B)36.59% 794.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.37% 7.984G
Total100.00% 2.171T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.85% 1.510P 97.26% 2.111T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 2.672T 0.20% 4.403G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 80.40G 0.02% 376.1M
Other2.97% 46.31T 2.52% 54.77G
Total100.00% 1.559P 100.00% 2.171T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.16% 2.515T 0.09% 1.971G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.41% 68.78T 5.22% 113.2G
164021.17% 18.28T 1.02% 22.15G
270301.02% 15.88T 0.82% 17.73G
150000.78% 12.17T 0.75% 16.31G
600110.68% 10.63T 0.52% 11.33G