Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20091019

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20091019 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.67% of octets and 19.08% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.09M
5 1.488M 7 10.49M
10 1.599M 15 10.95M
50 3.175M 57 17.74M
90 15.37M 59 51.45M
95 28.56M 59 79.64M
99 82.81M 59 209.5M
99.9 198.2M 59 694.2M
99.99 519.0M 59 1.620G
99.999 1.270G 59 2.828G
100 65.95G 62 11.04G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.04% 8.350G
Medium (100-1400B)9.82% 40.27G
Large (1401-1500B)88.12% 361.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 97.07M
Total100.00% 410.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.24% 181.3T 30.93% 126.8G 38.73% 7.561M
Encrypted Traffic8.37% 48.59T 8.47% 34.73G 5.48% 1.069M
Advanced Apps4.03% 23.40T 3.96% 16.23G 4.84% 944.8k
File Sharing3.10% 17.97T 3.06% 12.53G 2.21% 432.2k
Measurement1.72% 9.974T 2.11% 8.657G 0.45% 88.37k
Misc0.69% 4.002T 0.70% 2.883G 1.12% 219.4k
Games0.16% 945.3G 0.16% 675.8M 0.21% 40.44k
Audio/Video0.13% 778.4G 0.13% 549.1M 0.28% 55.55k
Unidentified50.55% 293.4T 50.48% 207.0G 46.67% 9.110M
Total100.00% 580.4T 100.00% 410.2G 100.00% 19.52M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.636G824419ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.528G824416ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.586G146410Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.443G145120Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
1.288G137419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.012G900016UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]Iperf
995.3M150011Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]Iperf
973.6M150020Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
967.7M146419Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
965.4M150010U Wisconsin [59]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.671G139620Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]BBCP
1.620G137419Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5098 -> 5098
1.601G146419Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]43164 -> 53460
1.016G150016Unknown [32361]SDSC [195]5011 -> 5011
982.4M150018Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]5018 -> 5018
961.7M900020UIUC [38]Abilene [11537]5016 -> 5016
956.8M146420Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
876.2M146427Pennsylvania State U [3999]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
787.5M150020U Wisconsin [59]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
757.5M146460Abilene [11537]UMDNET [27]Shoutcast

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.556k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.18% 711.6T 47.77% 1.027T
Encrypted Traffic6.95% 107.0T 6.96% 149.7G
Advanced Apps2.33% 35.92T 1.67% 35.98G
File Sharing1.76% 27.18T 1.40% 30.09G
Misc1.67% 25.74T 3.49% 74.96G
Measurement0.81% 12.43T 0.78% 16.66G
Audio/Video0.52% 8.029T 0.44% 9.547G
Games0.27% 4.188T 0.48% 10.32G
Unidentified39.50% 608.6T 37.00% 795.6G
Total100.00% 1.540P 100.00% 2.150T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.69%
1.17%
0.80%
0.52%
---
673.3T
18.00T
12.38T
7.969T
---
45.82%
0.85%
0.62%
0.48%
---
985.2G
18.24G
13.31G
10.35G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.09%
2.64%
1.21%
0.01%
0.00%
---
47.68T
40.66T
18.61T
91.85G
14.78G
---
2.53%
3.41%
1.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
54.49G
73.31G
21.64G
214.1M
60.10M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.02%
0.16%
0.14%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.06T
2.431T
2.128T
232.4G
48.41G
18.03G
---
1.49%
0.08%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.06G
1.742G
1.715G
284.1M
117.7M
68.81M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.02%
0.37%
0.17%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.71T
5.654T
2.696T
2.255T
529.5G
146.7G
115.4G
34.01G
24.84G
7.680G
4.256G
1.072G
91.75M
---
0.77%
0.23%
0.22%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.47G
5.024G
4.657G
2.689G
636.8M
298.1M
165.6M
53.86M
28.08M
12.74M
53.69M
1.444M
132.7k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
NFS
RTIP
AOL AIM
IDENT
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.15%
0.15%
0.14%
0.07%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.70T
2.274T
2.138T
1.124T
949.4G
558.6G
384.9G
235.6G
87.54G
76.10G
69.73G
39.13G
31.39G
28.61G
28.08G
18.19G
618.1M
---
1.68%
0.87%
0.17%
0.10%
0.08%
0.04%
0.32%
0.14%
0.02%
0.01%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.16G
18.69G
3.642G
2.135G
1.649G
959.0M
6.860G
3.097G
357.5M
139.5M
660.5M
49.95M
63.36M
298.6M
51.54M
142.8M
2.599M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.78%
0.03%
0.00%
---
11.99T
435.3G
0.000
---
0.60%
0.18%
0.00%
---
12.89G
3.776G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.34%
0.14%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.291T
2.169T
328.1G
93.17G
84.71G
37.67G
17.80G
6.601G
0.000
---
0.31%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.601G
2.252G
368.6M
126.5M
107.0M
47.86M
28.21M
15.41M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.565T
605.4G
594.2G
265.0G
92.42G
43.90G
21.81G
---
0.18%
0.06%
0.19%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.934G
1.331G
3.992G
674.8M
164.7M
85.69M
146.5M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.50%
---
608.6T
---
37.00%
---
795.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.540P
---
100.00%
---
2.150T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 435.3G 0.18% 3.776G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.54M 0.00% 1.612M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 207.2G 0.01% 170.7M
TCP[6]91.13% 1.404P 87.65% 1.884T
UDP[17]6.99% 107.7T 10.65% 229.0G
IPv6[41]0.04% 611.5G 0.05% 1.044G
GRE[47]0.56% 8.570T 0.42% 8.969G
ESP[50]1.21% 18.61T 1.01% 21.64G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.242G 0.00% 55.22M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 423.6G 0.04% 837.1M
Total100.00% 1.540P 100.00% 2.150T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.89% 922.2G
Medium (100-1400B)19.80% 425.6G
Large (1401-1500B)37.22% 800.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 2.044G
Total100.00% 2.150T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.26% 1.498P 97.35% 2.093T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 2.616T 0.19% 4.063G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 62.23G 0.01% 316.7M
Other2.57% 39.53T 2.44% 52.49G
Total100.00% 1.540P 100.00% 2.150T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.17% 2.673T 0.10% 2.121G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.20% 64.69T 4.82% 103.5G
164021.10% 16.92T 0.96% 20.57G
150000.85% 13.06T 0.80% 17.30G
600110.77% 11.88T 0.53% 11.29G
270300.60% 9.287T 0.50% 10.69G