Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090928

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090928 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.59% of octets and 21.96% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 2 10.08M
5 1.476M 10 10.39M
10 1.570M 18 10.89M
50 2.945M 57 16.82M
90 14.44M 59 51.39M
95 24.85M 59 83.25M
99 85.86M 59 276.7M
99.9 194.4M 59 980.8M
99.99 371.0M 59 1.600G
99.999 986.5M 59 2.553G
100 7.350G 62 10.79G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)7.77% 40.28G
Medium (100-1400B)7.90% 40.95G
Large (1401-1500B)84.31% 437.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 69.48M
Total100.00% 518.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.85% 186.7T 25.13% 130.2G 35.42% 7.775M
Encrypted Traffic4.61% 32.03T 4.50% 23.30G 4.31% 945.8k
File Sharing3.62% 25.21T 3.80% 19.69G 2.18% 477.4k
Measurement3.40% 23.64T 3.22% 16.70G 6.50% 1.427M
Advanced Apps2.79% 19.43T 2.61% 13.52G 3.67% 806.4k
Misc0.58% 4.014T 0.57% 2.967G 1.00% 219.0k
Audio/Video0.15% 1.017T 0.14% 713.9M 0.33% 72.30k
Games0.13% 906.6G 0.13% 662.3M 0.19% 40.82k
Unidentified57.87% 402.5T 59.90% 310.5G 46.40% 10.18M
Total100.00% 695.6T 100.00% 518.3G 100.00% 21.94M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.433G824410ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.265G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.522G136820Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
1.431G146441Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
868.1M146410Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]Iperf
855.8M150030Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
843.7M146414INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
695.8M146415NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
655.0M146428Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
461.0M146418Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.728G138219Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5098 -> 5098
1.686G138220Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5082 -> 5082
572.8M150036Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]33747 -> 55519
544.5M150013UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]45174 -> 45667
540.9M150036Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]46970 -> 59360
510.2M150011Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]UNL [7896]54150 -> 45967
471.5M150011U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]51433 -> 48178
463.6M146418Abilene [11537]Unknown [0]Rsync
407.7M150034Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]48123 -> 50384
394.6M150019UNL [7896]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]48858 -> 35739

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.779k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.34% 779.1T 46.91% 1.107T
Encrypted Traffic4.70% 82.61T 5.53% 130.4G
File Sharing1.95% 34.34T 1.58% 37.39G
Measurement1.80% 31.62T 1.63% 38.58G
Advanced Apps1.77% 31.08T 1.36% 32.03G
Misc1.61% 28.22T 3.24% 76.40G
Audio/Video0.57% 9.930T 0.49% 11.49G
Games0.24% 4.188T 0.43% 10.09G
Unidentified43.02% 755.8T 38.83% 916.3G
Total100.00% 1.757P 100.00% 2.360T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
42.49%
0.89%
0.73%
0.24%
---
746.5T
15.65T
12.84T
4.138T
---
45.40%
0.66%
0.53%
0.32%
---
1.071T
15.65G
12.51G
7.656G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.57%
1.75%
0.38%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.16T
30.66T
6.683T
91.80G
15.50G
---
3.51%
1.60%
0.41%
0.01%
0.00%
---
82.83G
37.75G
9.623G
212.9M
60.50M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Direct Connect++
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
---
1.32%
0.34%
0.16%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.19T
5.935T
2.784T
1.698T
405.0G
167.7G
116.2G
23.73G
4.906G
4.573G
4.262G
4.132G
1.662G
---
1.01%
0.22%
0.22%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.90G
5.196G
5.159G
2.012G
504.3M
324.6M
187.5M
37.14M
7.736M
3.498M
9.069M
44.39M
2.215M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.77%
0.09%
0.00%
---
31.16T
1.615T
0.000
---
1.44%
0.68%
0.00%
---
34.01G
15.99G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.65%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.04T
1.662T
270.2G
51.87G
40.26G
11.57G
---
1.26%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.65G
1.334G
817.8M
134.1M
41.01M
54.34M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
IDENT
NTP
NFS
RTIP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.14%
0.11%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.84T
2.376T
1.941T
1.043T
908.7G
347.3G
227.4G
125.9G
92.90G
83.59G
60.79G
58.07G
43.46G
29.71G
23.01G
18.98G
254.8M
---
1.74%
0.79%
0.15%
0.09%
0.06%
0.27%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.05%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
40.98G
18.56G
3.526G
2.049G
1.434G
6.300G
714.1M
494.7M
105.7M
1.096G
102.8M
523.1M
58.75M
65.34M
232.1M
147.1M
2.321M
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.35%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.075T
3.185T
378.3G
119.3G
75.25G
55.81G
37.49G
3.041G
0.000
---
0.33%
0.12%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.768G
2.946G
399.9M
155.8M
99.91M
63.56M
48.03M
9.183M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.15%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.673T
609.2G
503.3G
234.6G
97.40G
46.35G
24.74G
---
0.18%
0.05%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
4.230G
1.285G
3.522G
599.2M
161.1M
89.49M
210.4M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.02%
---
755.8T
---
38.83%
---
916.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.757P
---
100.00%
---
2.360T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.09% 1.615T 0.68% 15.99G
IGMP[2]0.00% 59.47M 0.00% 1.579M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 294.5G 0.01% 233.4M
TCP[6]91.97% 1.615P 89.35% 2.108T
UDP[17]5.72% 100.5T 8.88% 209.5G
IPv6[41]0.04% 630.7G 0.04% 975.0M
GRE[47]1.83% 32.19T 1.09% 25.62G
ESP[50]0.38% 6.683T 0.41% 9.623G
AX.25[93]0.00% 157.5k 0.00% 1.750k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.193G 0.00% 55.12M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 335.2G 0.03% 671.9M
Total100.00% 1.757P 100.00% 2.360T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.57% 981.0G
Medium (100-1400B)18.50% 436.6G
Large (1401-1500B)39.31% 927.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.62% 14.59G
Total100.00% 2.360T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.82% 1.718P 97.76% 2.307T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 2.699T 0.17% 4.048G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 79.43G 0.02% 354.5M
Other2.02% 35.45T 2.05% 48.37G
Total100.00% 1.757P 100.00% 2.360T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.15% 2.717T 0.09% 2.043G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.05% 18.39T 1.17% 27.55G
164020.35% 6.142T 0.32% 7.539G
600110.17% 2.993T 0.14% 3.200G
200000.15% 2.657T 0.11% 2.514G
150000.14% 2.502T 0.14% 3.304G