Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090921

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090921 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/1 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.41% of octets and 17.58% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 1 10.08M
5 1.477M 8 10.40M
10 1.573M 16 10.92M
50 3.027M 57 16.79M
90 14.41M 59 46.65M
95 30.04M 59 72.00M
99 87.52M 59 200.5M
99.9 196.5M 59 592.5M
99.99 389.1M 59 1.572G
99.999 986.6M 59 2.818G
100 40.23G 60 10.65G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.51% 1.576G
Medium (100-1400B)10.35% 32.12G
Large (1401-1500B)89.03% 276.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 353.1M
Total100.00% 310.3G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.17% 130.5T 29.25% 90.77G 33.09% 5.331M
Encrypted Traffic7.12% 31.85T 7.37% 22.86G 5.66% 912.1k
Measurement5.37% 24.02T 5.40% 16.74G 9.27% 1.494M
Advanced Apps5.32% 23.79T 5.31% 16.48G 5.62% 905.5k
File Sharing2.97% 13.29T 2.89% 8.967G 1.82% 293.4k
Misc0.87% 3.884T 0.89% 2.776G 1.33% 214.2k
Games0.26% 1.174T 0.27% 844.5M 0.34% 54.71k
Audio/Video0.13% 600.6G 0.14% 421.3M 0.27% 43.05k
Unidentified48.79% 218.3T 48.48% 150.4G 42.60% 6.863M
Total100.00% 447.5T 100.00% 310.3G 100.00% 16.11M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.587G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.292G824417ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
813.2M150024Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
716.4M146412Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
706.4M150020Unknown [25776]Boston U [111]Iperf
666.9M146417NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
354.3M150020ESnet-West [292]UNL [7896]Iperf
351.8M146452Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf
305.6M150020UNL [7896]Purdue [17]Iperf
240.7M146420Boston U [111]Unknown [25776]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
642.6M150029Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]54746 -> 60853
559.7M150011Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]UNL [7896]Audiogalaxy
546.5M150021U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]44953 -> 63713
437.5M146411Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]58311 -> 20329
391.5M150024Unknown [32440]UCAR [194]48872 -> 50384
383.1M149913U Idaho [11808]Utah Education Net [210]HTTP
331.5M150039Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]51210 -> 50384
313.0M150028Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
310.4M150024Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]49148 -> 50384
297.1M150038Unknown [32440]PSC [1207]50320 -> 50391

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.284k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.08% 566.3T 48.70% 859.7G
Encrypted Traffic5.91% 72.68T 6.52% 115.1G
Advanced Apps2.93% 35.96T 2.05% 36.19G
Measurement2.53% 31.05T 2.21% 39.05G
Misc2.09% 25.71T 3.80% 67.07G
File Sharing1.63% 19.98T 1.27% 22.43G
Audio/Video0.67% 8.201T 0.54% 9.604G
Games0.32% 3.986T 0.50% 8.850G
Unidentified37.85% 465.1T 34.40% 607.2G
Total100.00% 1.229P 100.00% 1.765T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.93%
1.23%
0.81%
0.11%
---
539.9T
15.10T
9.987T
1.354T
---
47.00%
0.83%
0.61%
0.26%
---
829.7G
14.64G
10.70G
4.675G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.06%
2.44%
0.41%
0.00%
0.00%
---
37.67T
29.95T
4.986T
58.44G
13.73G
---
3.91%
2.11%
0.49%
0.01%
0.00%
---
68.94G
37.32G
8.628G
165.6M
58.26M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.57%
0.22%
0.13%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.57T
2.735T
1.618T
29.74G
8.364G
1.058G
---
1.80%
0.17%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.71G
3.056G
1.314G
65.07M
37.79M
1.568M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.47%
0.39%
0.00%
---
30.37T
4.736T
0.000
---
1.86%
2.44%
0.00%
---
32.89G
43.14G
0.000
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
IDENT
NTP
NFS
RTIP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
Telnet
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.45%
0.17%
0.17%
0.13%
0.08%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.86T
2.096T
2.048T
1.560T
995.4G
362.5G
327.8G
101.0G
91.77G
78.19G
56.08G
46.65G
28.19G
24.74G
21.57G
9.606G
938.5M
---
1.98%
0.90%
0.19%
0.11%
0.09%
0.05%
0.34%
0.03%
0.01%
0.06%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
35.00G
15.94G
3.386G
1.915G
1.559G
808.4M
5.987G
442.5M
109.5M
1.025G
109.2M
414.4M
44.71M
31.09M
195.5M
87.04M
5.012M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.75%
0.52%
0.18%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.221T
6.330T
2.266T
1.492T
381.1G
161.5G
98.53G
23.14G
4.114G
3.197G
3.161G
873.0M
13.64M
---
0.56%
0.31%
0.24%
0.10%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.960G
5.487G
4.206G
1.768G
481.2M
301.0M
139.7M
30.96M
8.024M
43.40M
3.249M
2.260M
97.30k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.36%
0.26%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.454T
3.140T
363.3G
108.4G
89.71G
25.26G
13.62G
6.473G
0.000
---
0.22%
0.28%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.839G
4.916G
395.5M
135.8M
245.2M
35.86M
20.31M
15.93M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.20%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.441T
745.9G
495.3G
176.2G
77.02G
30.34G
20.22G
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.610G
1.247G
3.186G
439.2M
120.5M
73.52M
172.1M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.85%
---
465.1T
---
34.40%
---
607.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.229P
---
100.00%
---
1.765T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.39% 4.736T 2.44% 43.14G
IGMP[2]0.00% 57.03M 0.00% 1.496M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 199.4G 0.01% 149.6M
TCP[6]90.67% 1.114P 88.19% 1.556T
UDP[17]7.74% 95.16T 10.18% 179.7G
IPv6[41]0.03% 406.8G 0.04% 755.0M
GRE[47]1.05% 12.86T 0.69% 12.23G
ESP[50]0.41% 4.986T 0.49% 8.628G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 3.733G 0.00% 50.16M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.03% 413.7G 0.05% 800.6M
Total100.00% 1.229P 100.00% 1.765T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)44.23% 780.7G
Medium (100-1400B)20.00% 352.9G
Large (1401-1500B)35.44% 625.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.34% 5.972G
Total100.00% 1.765T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.55% 1.198P 97.58% 1.722T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 2.881T 0.22% 3.896G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 76.24G 0.02% 300.6M
Other2.21% 27.20T 2.19% 38.59G
Total100.00% 1.229P 100.00% 1.765T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.22% 2.648T 0.11% 1.932G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.25% 3.027T 0.45% 7.911G
600110.24% 2.973T 0.18% 3.231G
164020.22% 2.676T 0.19% 3.302G
330010.12% 1.531T 0.06% 1.050G
330020.08% 966.5G 0.04% 661.3M