Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090914

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090914 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.41% of octets and 22.27% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 2 10.08M
5 1.478M 8 10.49M
10 1.576M 17 10.94M
50 2.944M 58 16.89M
90 14.29M 59 48.00M
95 30.86M 59 76.27M
99 105.9M 59 307.0M
99.9 238.0M 59 1.180G
99.99 410.1M 59 1.732G
99.999 827.1M 59 2.507G
100 22.95G 62 10.19G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)9.90% 44.87G
Medium (100-1400B)7.26% 32.88G
Large (1401-1500B)82.71% 374.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 617.3M
Total100.00% 453.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers23.57% 141.4T 21.77% 98.66G 31.32% 5.800M
Encrypted Traffic6.55% 39.27T 6.20% 28.10G 5.29% 979.2k
File Sharing3.96% 23.78T 4.18% 18.94G 2.22% 411.7k
Measurement3.94% 23.62T 3.64% 16.48G 8.37% 1.550M
Advanced Apps3.59% 21.54T 3.31% 14.98G 4.71% 871.5k
Misc0.54% 3.229T 0.54% 2.437G 0.98% 180.7k
Games0.14% 840.5G 0.13% 608.2M 0.21% 39.43k
Audio/Video0.09% 527.2G 0.08% 380.2M 0.21% 38.25k
Unidentified57.62% 345.6T 60.14% 272.5G 46.69% 8.646M
Total100.00% 599.9T 100.00% 453.1G 100.00% 18.51M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.429G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.561G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
893.4M146424INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
848.3M150011Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
742.3M150020Unknown [25776]Boston U [111]Iperf
650.2M146413Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]Iperf
608.5M146422Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf
588.5M146420NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
511.2M150015ESnet-West [292]UNL [7896]Iperf
426.4M150057UNL [7896]Purdue [17]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
768.0M150012UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]35875 -> 21852
651.6M150026Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]49108 -> 37923
618.8M150015Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]40083 -> 47258
566.7M150015Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]TACCNET [32093]24353 -> 48959
565.2M150014UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]48306 -> 56536
507.6M150026Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]44261 -> 50384
499.8M146410Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
480.5M146414Abilene [11537]Unknown [0]Rsync
450.6M146436U Florida [6356]UNL [7896]36255 -> 39864
440.4M150022U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]49737 -> 39526

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.504k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.19% 552.0T 42.06% 855.9G
Encrypted Traffic5.46% 81.10T 5.96% 121.3G
Advanced Apps2.23% 33.12T 1.64% 33.45G
File Sharing2.20% 32.72T 1.79% 36.40G
Measurement2.02% 30.05T 1.91% 38.88G
Misc1.66% 24.57T 3.44% 70.02G
Audio/Video0.50% 7.418T 0.45% 9.122G
Games0.26% 3.859T 0.48% 9.853G
Unidentified48.47% 719.5T 42.26% 860.0G
Total100.00% 1.484P 100.00% 2.035T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
35.08%
1.11%
0.78%
0.22%
---
520.6T
16.52T
11.61T
3.230T
---
40.29%
0.83%
0.60%
0.34%
---
819.8G
16.95G
12.16G
6.975G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.67%
2.35%
0.43%
0.01%
0.00%
---
39.62T
34.93T
6.446T
82.93G
14.13G
---
2.24%
3.24%
0.47%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.56G
65.89G
9.643G
199.4M
58.67M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.05%
0.14%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.43T
2.015T
614.7G
42.62G
17.06G
721.6M
---
1.52%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.97G
1.611G
694.7M
113.4M
57.11M
2.687M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.42%
0.42%
0.18%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.09T
6.264T
2.686T
1.838T
444.4G
214.7G
136.5G
29.95G
8.255G
4.680G
3.646G
711.1M
57.07M
---
1.10%
0.27%
0.23%
0.13%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.31G
5.506G
4.727G
2.664G
548.0M
227.0M
304.8M
42.61M
13.65M
6.793M
45.81M
2.715M
104.1k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.97%
0.07%
0.00%
---
29.17T
1.020T
111.6k
---
1.56%
0.41%
0.00%
---
31.81G
8.247G
135.0
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
AOL AIM
SNMP
SOCKS
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.10%
0.14%
0.14%
0.13%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.30T
2.129T
2.118T
1.991T
1.048T
336.4G
275.0G
94.68G
83.88G
53.98G
41.18G
22.35G
21.44G
18.79G
17.95G
13.55G
1.068G
---
1.68%
0.88%
0.18%
0.17%
0.07%
0.30%
0.03%
0.02%
0.05%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
34.14G
17.96G
3.678G
3.557G
1.408G
6.044G
677.7M
390.1M
1.100G
470.7M
88.29M
230.3M
33.70M
149.4M
39.87M
45.62M
4.297M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.25%
0.22%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.670T
3.228T
339.9G
79.76G
53.54G
21.70G
18.82G
5.785G
0.000
---
0.16%
0.25%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.312G
5.151G
387.7M
109.2M
86.68M
33.93M
29.48M
11.44M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.15%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.286T
660.9G
576.7G
179.0G
79.55G
49.64G
27.35G
---
0.19%
0.07%
0.18%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.02%
---
3.791G
1.324G
3.652G
505.0M
136.9M
97.58M
344.0M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
48.47%
---
719.5T
---
42.26%
---
860.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.484P
---
100.00%
---
2.035T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 1.020T 0.41% 8.247G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.27M 0.00% 1.602M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 241.0G 0.01% 191.6M
TCP[6]85.39% 1.267P 85.45% 1.739T
UDP[17]6.64% 98.59T 9.85% 200.4G
IPv6[41]0.03% 481.0G 0.04% 784.3M
GRE[47]7.41% 110.0T 3.81% 77.44G
ESP[50]0.43% 6.446T 0.47% 9.643G
AX.25[93]0.00% 185.1k 0.00% 2.100k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.996G 0.00% 52.92M
IPMP[169]0.00% 111.6k 0.00% 135.0
Other0.02% 255.4G 0.03% 512.1M
Total100.00% 1.484P 100.00% 2.035T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.97% 874.4G
Medium (100-1400B)17.99% 366.1G
Large (1401-1500B)37.61% 765.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.43% 29.13G
Total100.00% 2.035T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.00% 1.439P 97.30% 1.980T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 2.577T 0.19% 3.886G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 54.82G 0.01% 256.4M
Other2.82% 41.84T 2.50% 50.86G
Total100.00% 1.484P 100.00% 2.035T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.13% 1.896T 0.07% 1.420G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.48% 21.97T 2.74% 55.85G
164021.11% 16.42T 0.99% 20.13G
330010.56% 8.376T 0.28% 5.744G
600110.45% 6.752T 0.36% 7.337G
200000.41% 6.136T 0.28% 5.773G