Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090907

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090907 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.45% of octets and 25.05% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 2 10.08M
5 1.490M 8 10.50M
10 1.599M 15 10.98M
50 3.099M 57 17.32M
90 16.47M 59 52.95M
95 35.11M 59 87.69M
99 123.0M 59 486.4M
99.9 286.4M 59 1.448G
99.99 451.4M 59 2.108G
99.999 1.434G 60 2.752G
100 15.90G 61 9.093G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)12.97% 63.15G
Medium (100-1400B)6.80% 33.12G
Large (1401-1500B)80.11% 390.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 543.0M
Total100.00% 486.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers22.09% 137.9T 19.75% 96.13G 33.88% 5.645M
Encrypted Traffic5.75% 35.94T 5.38% 26.18G 5.56% 926.5k
File Sharing4.12% 25.76T 4.40% 21.44G 2.13% 354.8k
Advanced Apps3.75% 23.41T 3.34% 16.28G 5.55% 925.2k
Measurement2.34% 14.62T 2.06% 10.05G 5.19% 864.8k
Misc0.49% 3.048T 0.52% 2.553G 1.03% 171.4k
Games0.13% 822.1G 0.12% 591.8M 0.21% 34.84k
Audio/Video0.09% 532.1G 0.08% 380.9M 0.23% 38.01k
Unidentified61.24% 382.5T 64.34% 313.2G 46.22% 7.701M
Total100.00% 624.7T 100.00% 486.8G 100.00% 16.66M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.870G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.638G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
872.1M146430INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
610.3M146420NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
580.5M150011ESnet-West [292]UNL [7896]Iperf
442.1M150028APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
413.8M146459Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf
369.0M150014UNL [7896]Purdue [17]Iperf
193.6M146427NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
187.4M150010UNL [7896]ESnet-West [292]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
672.9M150015Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]44252 -> 56982
625.4M150012UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]33326 -> 48999
613.3M150018Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]39723 -> 34880
589.0M150013U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]56020 -> 38151
581.8M146439Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [36375]50032 -> 51718
579.0M149913Unknown [40189]UW-Milwaukee [7050]SSH
520.3M150013Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]UNL [7896]49838 -> 57004
515.8M146434U Florida [6356]UNL [7896]57127 -> 52036
479.7M146412Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
462.1M150021UNL [7896]U Florida [6356]57432 -> 52405

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.332k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers32.60% 491.3T 37.41% 726.9G
Encrypted Traffic4.86% 73.21T 5.62% 109.2G
Advanced Apps2.38% 35.85T 1.88% 36.51G
File Sharing2.28% 34.32T 1.92% 37.24G
Misc1.67% 25.14T 3.31% 64.34G
Measurement1.16% 17.52T 1.24% 24.12G
Audio/Video0.47% 7.081T 0.42% 8.256G
Games0.24% 3.674T 0.49% 9.619G
Unidentified54.35% 819.1T 47.70% 927.1G
Total100.00% 1.507P 100.00% 1.943T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
30.65%
1.18%
0.57%
0.20%
---
461.9T
17.73T
8.543T
3.073T
---
35.69%
0.91%
0.48%
0.33%
---
693.7G
17.62G
9.253G
6.387G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.38%
2.13%
0.35%
0.01%
0.00%
---
35.86T
32.05T
5.201T
81.75G
13.96G
---
2.25%
2.95%
0.41%
0.01%
0.00%
---
43.72G
57.32G
7.957G
198.0M
56.91M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.20%
0.15%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.14T
2.198T
453.1G
38.81G
18.87G
1.300G
---
1.75%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.99G
1.755G
592.0M
105.9M
56.06M
4.269M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.57%
0.41%
0.16%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.63T
6.173T
2.350T
1.511T
407.9G
131.0G
83.84G
15.78G
5.469G
4.288G
4.266G
312.9M
123.9M
---
1.27%
0.28%
0.21%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
24.67G
5.508G
4.114G
1.956G
499.0M
271.3M
128.2M
29.69M
11.46M
4.592M
43.15M
2.920M
135.0k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
NFS
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
IDENT
AOL AIM
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
0.89%
0.31%
0.13%
0.12%
0.08%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.47T
4.712T
1.902T
1.859T
1.155T
1.020T
322.8G
255.7G
118.1G
84.89G
63.95G
55.49G
45.96G
24.25G
22.38G
18.17G
495.0M
---
1.56%
0.22%
0.76%
0.17%
0.08%
0.05%
0.29%
0.04%
0.02%
0.06%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.24G
4.261G
14.77G
3.394G
1.582G
1.015G
5.706G
867.3M
391.6M
1.104G
499.1M
78.19M
52.23M
182.0M
43.63M
147.3M
3.322M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.12%
0.04%
0.00%
---
16.89T
633.0G
0.000
---
0.92%
0.32%
0.00%
---
17.88G
6.239G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.24%
0.19%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.689T
2.861T
341.0G
69.71G
60.37G
28.79G
22.37G
7.959G
0.000
---
0.17%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.243G
4.357G
387.7M
96.76M
82.71M
39.13M
34.59M
13.99M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.14%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.137T
617.5G
544.7G
214.2G
84.37G
50.54G
25.69G
---
0.18%
0.20%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.429G
3.873G
1.275G
544.6M
137.9M
83.56M
275.7M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
54.35%
---
819.1T
---
47.70%
---
927.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.507P
---
100.00%
---
1.943T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 633.0G 0.32% 6.239G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.97M 0.00% 1.618M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 184.6G 0.01% 149.6M
TCP[6]81.32% 1.225P 82.47% 1.602T
UDP[17]6.79% 102.3T 10.59% 205.8G
IPv6[41]0.03% 486.7G 0.04% 767.0M
GRE[47]11.46% 172.6T 6.15% 119.4G
ESP[50]0.35% 5.201T 0.41% 7.957G
AX.25[93]0.00% 131.4k 0.00% 1.400k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.811G 0.00% 50.50M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 82.40G 0.01% 202.4M
Total100.00% 1.507P 100.00% 1.943T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.21% 781.5G
Medium (100-1400B)17.62% 342.3G
Large (1401-1500B)39.65% 770.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)2.52% 49.01G
Total100.00% 1.943T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.65% 1.471P 97.51% 1.894T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 2.486T 0.19% 3.693G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 39.27G 0.01% 178.4M
Other2.19% 32.95T 2.30% 44.61G
Total100.00% 1.507P 100.00% 1.943T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.07% 989.7G 0.04% 823.0M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.48% 22.36T 2.88% 55.91G
164021.37% 20.60T 1.30% 25.21G
600110.87% 13.09T 0.70% 13.55G
330010.85% 12.84T 0.45% 8.804G
330020.78% 11.74T 0.41% 8.041G