Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090831

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090831 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.85% of octets and 23.00% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 2 10.09M
5 1.499M 9 10.50M
10 1.623M 17 11.07M
50 3.386M 58 18.88M
90 15.68M 59 59.22M
95 28.81M 59 96.91M
99 91.65M 59 284.5M
99.9 231.7M 59 1.110G
99.99 416.5M 59 1.908G
99.999 1.289G 60 2.792G
100 13.88G 64 9.942G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)7.33% 30.58G
Medium (100-1400B)8.30% 34.61G
Large (1401-1500B)84.31% 351.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 259.8M
Total100.00% 417.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers24.83% 140.3T 23.49% 97.98G 34.20% 5.519M
Encrypted Traffic7.07% 39.95T 6.93% 28.91G 6.04% 974.3k
File Sharing4.24% 23.96T 4.33% 18.07G 2.91% 469.5k
Advanced Apps3.91% 22.09T 3.69% 15.37G 5.58% 901.3k
Measurement0.93% 5.261T 0.80% 3.335G 0.55% 88.86k
Misc0.55% 3.107T 0.55% 2.275G 1.06% 171.8k
Games0.15% 868.2G 0.15% 613.4M 0.22% 35.92k
Audio/Video0.09% 513.8G 0.09% 367.5M 0.23% 36.49k
Unidentified58.23% 329.0T 59.98% 250.1G 49.20% 7.940M
Total100.00% 565.1T 100.00% 417.1G 100.00% 16.13M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.606G824416ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.636G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.035G900011Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
892.9M146430INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
795.1M900014AMES-NAS [24]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
691.0M146414NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Iperf
672.2M146411Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
490.1M150030Unknown [32361]Unknown [25776]Iperf
482.5M150015ESnet-West [292]UNL [7896]Iperf
438.9M146411Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
820.0M146415Merit [237]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
762.7M900011Abilene [11537]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]37967 -> 5101
663.2M150026UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]58296 -> 54712
645.7M150021Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]37766 -> 40476
640.6M150010Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]Audiogalaxy
608.0M150010Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]TACCNET [32093]23060 -> 54454
577.3M142010Microsoft London IDC [8075]U Wisconsin [59]HTTP
563.4M146416U Florida [6356]UNL [7896]38619 -> 58079
506.7M150014UNL [7896]U Florida [6356]49287 -> 45497
479.0M150010OSAGEDIGITAL [18460]Abilene [11537]50352 -> 3002

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.296k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers35.03% 473.0T 39.30% 712.7G
Encrypted Traffic5.87% 79.27T 6.37% 115.4G
Advanced Apps2.57% 34.69T 1.94% 35.23G
File Sharing2.43% 32.79T 1.90% 34.41G
Misc1.68% 22.62T 3.76% 68.18G
Audio/Video0.58% 7.878T 0.51% 9.254G
Measurement0.53% 7.170T 0.68% 12.25G
Games0.29% 3.857T 0.52% 9.421G
Unidentified51.03% 689.0T 45.03% 816.6G
Total100.00% 1.350P 100.00% 1.813T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
32.68%
1.41%
0.66%
0.29%
---
441.2T
18.98T
8.853T
3.955T
---
37.30%
1.04%
0.56%
0.40%
---
676.4G
18.81G
10.08G
7.342G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.89%
2.40%
0.57%
0.01%
0.00%
---
39.07T
32.45T
7.663T
72.62G
13.36G
---
2.52%
3.25%
0.58%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.62G
59.01G
10.55G
180.2M
56.83M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.39%
0.16%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.30T
2.227T
90.17G
40.54G
37.59G
2.525G
---
1.83%
0.10%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
33.12G
1.796G
123.6M
105.6M
72.42M
11.86M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Blubster
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.62%
0.44%
0.22%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.89T
5.875T
2.923T
1.480T
339.1G
125.2G
86.32G
40.49G
17.35G
7.112G
2.948G
1.374G
208.6M
---
1.20%
0.29%
0.26%
0.11%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.72G
5.205G
4.648G
1.906G
424.6M
261.3M
127.8M
61.83M
31.93M
12.82M
4.023M
4.211M
358.0k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
NFS
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.06%
0.17%
0.13%
0.10%
0.08%
0.07%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.32T
2.229T
1.809T
1.394T
1.065T
953.3G
325.1G
204.2G
94.62G
83.44G
53.42G
25.01G
20.36G
19.75G
18.18G
4.728G
566.5M
---
1.77%
1.04%
0.17%
0.17%
0.07%
0.05%
0.32%
0.03%
0.02%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.16G
18.81G
3.122G
3.059G
1.310G
955.0M
5.764G
604.1M
394.5M
1.095G
445.8M
188.5M
45.62M
30.88M
140.5M
40.63M
3.808M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.33%
0.21%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.512T
2.877T
320.9G
68.80G
63.81G
16.08G
14.29G
4.437G
0.000
---
0.22%
0.26%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.954G
4.689G
379.7M
87.94M
83.83M
25.12M
23.66M
9.617M
0.000
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.48%
0.05%
0.00%
---
6.495T
674.6G
6.579M
---
0.32%
0.35%
0.00%
---
5.842G
6.413G
4.500k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.17%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.332T
632.5G
563.5G
191.3G
76.18G
35.96G
25.80G
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.19%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
3.624G
1.353G
3.523G
486.3M
126.0M
86.03M
221.5M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
51.03%
---
689.0T
---
45.03%
---
816.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.350P
---
100.00%
---
1.813T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 674.6G 0.35% 6.413G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.92M 0.00% 1.619M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 242.4G 0.01% 196.9M
TCP[6]84.14% 1.136P 83.09% 1.506T
UDP[17]7.35% 99.23T 11.52% 208.8G
IPv6[41]0.03% 385.5G 0.04% 636.1M
GRE[47]7.84% 105.9T 4.40% 79.73G
ESP[50]0.57% 7.663T 0.58% 10.55G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.967M 0.00% 5.800k
PIM[103]0.00% 3.584G 0.00% 47.85M
IPMP[169]0.00% 6.579M 0.00% 4.500k
Other0.01% 74.53G 0.01% 186.6M
Total100.00% 1.350P 100.00% 1.813T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.62% 754.8G
Medium (100-1400B)19.96% 361.9G
Large (1401-1500B)37.84% 686.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.58% 10.43G
Total100.00% 1.813T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.31% 1.314P 97.45% 1.767T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 2.073T 0.17% 3.053G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 38.53G 0.01% 197.5M
Other2.53% 34.15T 2.37% 42.98G
Total100.00% 1.350P 100.00% 1.813T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.12% 1.610T 0.07% 1.231G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330011.55% 20.93T 0.79% 14.33G
19351.52% 20.50T 2.79% 50.53G
164021.32% 17.77T 1.19% 21.63G
330020.91% 12.32T 0.47% 8.435G
200000.70% 9.488T 0.48% 8.693G