Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090824

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090824 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.05% of octets and 25.02% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.399M 1 10.09M
5 1.510M 7 10.50M
10 1.645M 14 11.10M
50 3.568M 57 18.88M
90 18.26M 59 63.75M
95 36.01M 59 107.0M
99 106.4M 59 405.6M
99.9 243.0M 59 1.254G
99.99 412.9M 59 1.894G
99.999 1.502G 60 2.580G
100 14.44G 61 9.783G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)9.55% 39.62G
Medium (100-1400B)7.79% 32.30G
Large (1401-1500B)82.58% 342.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 315.6M
Total100.00% 414.7G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers23.17% 127.8T 21.44% 88.92G 36.75% 5.293M
Encrypted Traffic8.79% 48.50T 8.23% 34.12G 6.63% 954.6k
Advanced Apps3.96% 21.82T 3.66% 15.18G 6.04% 869.7k
File Sharing3.91% 21.58T 4.10% 17.00G 2.23% 321.2k
Measurement1.10% 6.077T 1.10% 4.549G 0.72% 103.7k
Misc0.53% 2.917T 0.61% 2.525G 1.13% 162.3k
Games0.11% 592.0G 0.10% 432.9M 0.20% 28.52k
Audio/Video0.10% 526.0G 0.09% 374.8M 0.26% 37.62k
Unidentified58.33% 321.7T 60.67% 251.6G 46.04% 6.631M
Total100.00% 551.6T 100.00% 414.7G 100.00% 14.40M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.648G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.760G824412ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
895.2M146430Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
883.3M150030INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
770.3M146429DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Abilene [11537]Iperf
731.7M150028Unknown [32361]Unknown [25776]Iperf
455.8M146413Boston U [111]Purdue [17]Iperf
451.3M150013U Wisconsin [59]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Iperf
383.8M150013Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
378.1M150021Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
881.5M146430Merit [237]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
823.0M150010OSAGEDIGITAL [18460]Abilene [11537]64221 -> 3002
702.2M150014UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]45622 -> 44087
697.8M150012Purdue [17]UNL [7896]58075 -> 60389
620.8M150019Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]47475 -> 50132
552.0M150011Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]53455 -> 59295
541.3M150017U Florida [6356]UNL [7896]35527 -> 48622
491.0M150045U Wisconsin [59]UNL [7896]37283 -> 59976
454.5M150015UNL [7896]U Florida [6356]59532 -> 21483
435.9M146413Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.132k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers32.30% 413.9T 37.89% 628.2G
Encrypted Traffic6.99% 89.54T 7.19% 119.2G
Advanced Apps2.70% 34.62T 2.14% 35.54G
File Sharing2.24% 28.71T 1.87% 30.96G
Misc1.76% 22.56T 3.82% 63.30G
Measurement0.62% 7.880T 0.69% 11.37G
Audio/Video0.49% 6.246T 0.50% 8.225G
Games0.23% 2.983T 0.46% 7.687G
Unidentified52.67% 674.8T 45.44% 753.3G
Total100.00% 1.281P 100.00% 1.657T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
30.11%
1.21%
0.72%
0.27%
---
385.7T
15.47T
9.266T
3.420T
---
35.95%
0.94%
0.61%
0.39%
---
596.0G
15.54G
10.18G
6.486G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.71%
2.52%
0.75%
0.01%
0.00%
---
47.57T
32.32T
9.555T
77.95G
13.87G
---
3.02%
3.40%
0.75%
0.01%
0.00%
---
50.13G
56.41G
12.41G
188.6M
56.36M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.51%
0.17%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.16T
2.219T
190.4G
31.55G
11.65G
1.379G
---
1.99%
0.11%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.94G
1.795G
646.8M
94.01M
58.09M
13.79M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.47%
0.43%
0.21%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.84T
5.465T
2.680T
1.224T
280.7G
105.2G
89.55G
14.70G
6.041G
3.141G
2.705G
2.668G
10.46M
---
1.17%
0.29%
0.27%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.34G
4.889G
4.495G
1.468G
334.3M
220.5M
128.1M
22.50M
10.16M
4.508M
36.08M
2.930M
39.00k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
RTIP
NFS
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.12%
0.22%
0.15%
0.14%
0.06%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.31T
2.800T
1.920T
1.822T
738.5G
317.0G
308.4G
77.47G
67.25G
54.33G
40.69G
30.83G
27.19G
17.63G
13.53G
2.928G
384.8M
---
1.95%
0.21%
0.90%
0.18%
0.07%
0.04%
0.33%
0.06%
0.02%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.37G
3.459G
14.97G
2.935G
1.151G
648.9M
5.433G
1.018G
325.5M
444.4M
74.36M
53.68M
208.7M
139.2M
16.92M
33.04M
5.138M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.57%
0.04%
0.00%
---
7.323T
556.9G
0.000
---
0.42%
0.27%
0.00%
---
6.900G
4.478G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.24%
0.22%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.108T
2.773T
231.2G
54.58G
48.00G
14.69G
11.23G
3.938G
0.000
---
0.18%
0.29%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.982G
4.769G
280.2M
71.50M
70.60M
22.62M
20.81M
8.247M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
Spy Arcade
---
0.13%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.677T
565.9G
452.0G
179.0G
66.57G
26.73G
16.35G
---
0.17%
0.08%
0.17%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
2.760G
1.298G
2.878G
430.3M
112.8M
56.21M
150.5M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
52.67%
---
674.8T
---
45.44%
---
753.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.281P
---
100.00%
---
1.657T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 556.9G 0.27% 4.478G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.65M 0.00% 1.614M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 250.7G 0.01% 218.1M
TCP[6]81.61% 1.045P 83.07% 1.377T
UDP[17]7.47% 95.74T 10.08% 167.1G
IPv6[41]0.03% 359.3G 0.03% 523.5M
GRE[47]10.07% 129.0T 5.77% 95.57G
ESP[50]0.75% 9.555T 0.75% 12.41G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.732G 0.00% 48.83M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 86.51G 0.01% 203.0M
Total100.00% 1.281P 100.00% 1.657T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.19% 666.2G
Medium (100-1400B)19.64% 325.5G
Large (1401-1500B)39.29% 651.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.89% 14.76G
Total100.00% 1.657T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.15% 1.244P 97.56% 1.617T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.11% 1.436T 0.12% 1.953G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 40.81G 0.01% 200.9M
Other2.73% 35.02T 2.31% 38.34G
Total100.00% 1.281P 100.00% 1.657T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.15% 1.871T 0.08% 1.371G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330012.42% 31.06T 1.28% 21.26G
330022.30% 29.52T 1.22% 20.21G
19351.50% 19.21T 2.56% 42.51G
200000.69% 8.850T 0.51% 8.410G
164020.60% 7.636T 0.57% 9.477G