Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090817

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090817 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 44.33% of octets and 24.64% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.401M 2 10.08M
5 1.517M 7 10.51M
10 1.661M 15 11.11M
50 3.502M 58 19.05M
90 16.15M 59 58.65M
95 29.60M 59 91.35M
99 86.73M 59 248.0M
99.9 212.0M 59 860.1M
99.99 439.7M 59 1.860G
99.999 2.000G 60 3.491G
100 7.955G 61 18.21G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.40% 8.316G
Medium (100-1400B)8.43% 29.21G
Large (1401-1500B)89.11% 308.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 190.0M
Total100.00% 346.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.86% 142.3T 28.59% 99.09G 36.52% 5.446M
Encrypted Traffic8.45% 41.66T 8.81% 30.52G 6.64% 990.3k
Advanced Apps4.08% 20.14T 4.03% 13.95G 5.24% 781.1k
File Sharing3.71% 18.30T 3.67% 12.71G 2.81% 418.3k
Measurement1.88% 9.248T 2.13% 7.388G 0.69% 103.2k
Misc0.52% 2.574T 0.66% 2.303G 1.01% 150.6k
Games0.12% 613.7G 0.13% 441.3M 0.18% 27.14k
Audio/Video0.11% 524.6G 0.11% 372.1M 0.24% 35.78k
Unidentified52.27% 257.7T 51.87% 179.7G 46.67% 6.960M
Total100.00% 493.1T 100.00% 346.5G 100.00% 14.91M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.573G900014Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.762G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.212G824418ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.473G900027DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.502G150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
1.041G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
886.5M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
846.0M150010Unknown [32361]Unknown [25776]Iperf
796.9M150020Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
509.5M150025U Arizona [1706]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
912.8M149710U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]36126 -> 39210
805.6M149919UNL [7896]UW-Milwaukee [7050]HTTP
732.3M150018Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]42019 -> 60144
666.3M150029Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]59594 -> 35635
579.1M149225UNL [7896]U Texas, Arlington [18515]HTTP
578.5M142010Microsoft London IDC [8075]U Wisconsin [59]HTTP
572.3M150013U Florida [6356]UNL [7896]51004 -> 35915
564.1M150036Purdue [17]UNL [7896]45320 -> 43196
546.4M150023Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]52892 -> 50384
546.1M150013UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]48868 -> 42647

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.175k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers36.13% 401.9T 39.40% 554.2G
Encrypted Traffic6.75% 75.08T 7.57% 106.5G
Advanced Apps2.93% 32.54T 2.45% 34.48G
File Sharing2.35% 26.09T 1.98% 27.89G
Misc1.98% 21.97T 4.18% 58.72G
Measurement1.01% 11.27T 1.01% 14.26G
Audio/Video0.75% 8.369T 0.76% 10.74G
Games0.26% 2.892T 0.64% 8.980G
Unidentified47.85% 532.3T 41.99% 590.6G
Total100.00% 1.112P 100.00% 1.406T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
33.57%
1.51%
0.83%
0.21%
---
373.4T
16.82T
9.274T
2.389T
---
37.22%
1.18%
0.68%
0.32%
---
523.4G
16.63G
9.558G
4.561G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.57%
2.65%
0.52%
0.01%
0.00%
---
39.72T
29.48T
5.779T
83.46G
15.11G
---
3.33%
3.62%
0.61%
0.01%
0.00%
---
46.85G
50.87G
8.553G
200.5M
59.63M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.75%
0.14%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.64T
1.603T
253.7G
37.45G
11.22G
2.066G
---
2.31%
0.09%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
32.47G
1.320G
513.2M
104.7M
60.93M
9.065M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.51%
0.43%
0.21%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.80T
4.810T
2.308T
1.691T
278.5G
94.38G
84.49G
12.14G
6.495G
2.626G
2.503G
165.3M
16.24M
---
1.17%
0.33%
0.29%
0.15%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.44G
4.581G
4.064G
2.141G
332.5M
125.4M
138.1M
21.35M
13.12M
3.548M
26.37M
728.7k
50.16k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NFS
NTP
RTIP
IRC
SOCKS
SNMP
Telnet
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.18%
0.33%
0.17%
0.15%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.08T
3.655T
1.854T
1.709T
726.3G
305.5G
284.5G
113.6G
66.51G
48.71G
46.83G
23.52G
18.06G
17.33G
11.46G
2.160G
335.4M
---
2.08%
0.21%
1.04%
0.20%
0.07%
0.39%
0.04%
0.01%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.31G
2.978G
14.56G
2.762G
974.0M
5.421G
587.5M
135.8M
873.4M
403.6M
283.0M
58.12M
142.1M
176.6M
12.82M
31.60M
3.527M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.97%
0.05%
0.00%
---
10.82T
524.4G
0.000
---
0.75%
0.31%
0.00%
---
10.54G
4.333G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.43%
0.29%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.775T
3.225T
248.3G
51.02G
37.54G
18.59G
9.511G
2.342G
0.000
---
0.38%
0.35%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.303G
4.973G
297.6M
73.51M
51.38M
24.27M
15.83M
5.605M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.15%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.642T
495.8G
428.2G
181.3G
96.50G
29.19G
18.70G
---
0.18%
0.08%
0.35%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.490G
1.056G
4.868G
220.4M
251.9M
52.62M
41.36M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
47.85%
---
532.3T
---
41.99%
---
590.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.112P
---
100.00%
---
1.406T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 524.4G 0.31% 4.333G
IGMP[2]0.00% 59.74M 0.00% 1.597M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 196.9G 0.01% 165.5M
TCP[6]85.44% 950.5T 84.77% 1.192T
UDP[17]5.55% 61.71T 9.11% 128.0G
IPv6[41]0.03% 313.7G 0.03% 427.2M
GRE[47]8.38% 93.24T 5.18% 72.88G
ESP[50]0.52% 5.779T 0.61% 8.553G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 3.912G 0.00% 51.46M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 257.6G 0.02% 334.2M
Total100.00% 1.112P 100.00% 1.406T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.10% 550.0G
Medium (100-1400B)19.62% 275.9G
Large (1401-1500B)40.67% 572.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.60% 8.448G
Total100.00% 1.406T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.28% 1.071P 96.85% 1.362T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.10% 1.087T 0.09% 1.251G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 42.81G 0.01% 203.1M
Other3.62% 40.29T 3.05% 42.90G
Total100.00% 1.112P 100.00% 1.406T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.21% 2.311T 0.12% 1.662G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.90% 21.14T 2.44% 34.25G
330011.02% 11.32T 0.55% 7.778G
330020.88% 9.745T 0.48% 6.690G
200000.51% 5.653T 0.41% 5.719G
21280.47% 5.232T 0.45% 6.386G