Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090810

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090810 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.18% of octets and 22.72% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.08M
5 1.503M 7 10.50M
10 1.634M 14 11.07M
50 3.669M 58 18.90M
90 15.37M 59 59.60M
95 25.52M 59 85.05M
99 70.58M 59 181.3M
99.9 173.0M 59 553.9M
99.99 556.4M 59 1.648G
99.999 3.360G 60 6.161G
100 25.01G 63 21.46G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.51% 6.551G
Medium (100-1400B)8.14% 21.21G
Large (1401-1500B)89.29% 232.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 157.3M
Total100.00% 260.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers38.38% 142.3T 38.02% 99.10G 45.19% 5.370M
Encrypted Traffic8.37% 31.04T 8.75% 22.81G 7.21% 857.1k
Advanced Apps3.73% 13.83T 3.64% 9.500G 4.42% 525.1k
Measurement2.54% 9.418T 2.57% 6.711G 1.32% 156.9k
File Sharing1.84% 6.827T 1.83% 4.764G 1.56% 185.0k
Misc0.61% 2.247T 0.84% 2.185G 1.10% 130.6k
Audio/Video0.18% 669.4G 0.18% 470.1M 0.37% 44.33k
Games0.15% 561.1G 0.16% 404.1M 0.22% 26.19k
Unidentified44.20% 163.9T 44.00% 114.6G 38.60% 4.587M
Total100.00% 370.9T 100.00% 260.6G 100.00% 11.88M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.213G900027UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.792G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.727G824412ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.001G150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
945.0M150014Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
903.2M150030INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
886.2M150020Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
878.3M150027LBL [16]Abilene [11537]Iperf
831.0M150020U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
797.6M150022Indiana [87]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.059G146414Boston U [111]U Chicago [160]60845 -> 20022
945.9M150016LBL [16]VANDERBILT [7212]50383 -> 48225
877.7M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]59681 -> 3002
715.7M150022UNL [7896]UW-Milwaukee [7050]HTTP
678.7M150032Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]33277 -> 50857
597.2M150029UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]55510 -> 22750
511.5M142010Microsoft London IDC [8075]U Wisconsin [59]HTTP
511.3M150019U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]34817 -> 46760
510.9M150011Argonne [683]Unknown [0]HTTP
489.6M150020Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Audiogalaxy

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 934.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.77% 384.9T 43.39% 497.8G
Encrypted Traffic7.07% 62.15T 7.97% 91.43G
Advanced Apps2.68% 23.59T 2.38% 27.32G
Misc1.95% 17.10T 4.92% 56.46G
File Sharing1.47% 12.89T 1.43% 16.42G
Measurement1.37% 12.06T 1.24% 14.17G
Audio/Video0.96% 8.472T 0.84% 9.628G
Games0.28% 2.488T 0.39% 4.490G
Unidentified40.44% 355.6T 37.43% 429.4G
Total100.00% 879.4T 100.00% 1.147T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.67%
1.99%
0.60%
0.51%
---
357.6T
17.49T
5.316T
4.495T
---
40.80%
1.48%
0.56%
0.56%
---
468.0G
16.96G
6.423G
6.377G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.36%
3.14%
0.56%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.54T
27.64T
4.881T
65.52G
17.02G
---
3.25%
4.05%
0.65%
0.01%
0.01%
---
37.31G
46.46G
7.431G
165.3M
58.03M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.57%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.60T
799.5G
143.6G
27.86G
15.72G
3.349G
---
2.27%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.08G
671.3M
378.1M
73.45M
62.82M
49.48M
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
X11
AFS
MS Windows
Port 0
IRC
NTP
SOCKS
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.34%
0.19%
0.19%
0.06%
0.04%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.81T
1.703T
1.698T
502.0G
385.6G
356.8G
312.3G
71.96G
60.00G
48.46G
45.96G
42.72G
35.97G
23.23G
4.810G
4.374G
243.8M
---
2.41%
0.25%
1.21%
0.07%
0.07%
0.58%
0.17%
0.03%
0.07%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.60G
2.851G
13.83G
772.2M
760.8M
6.610G
1.949G
347.0M
784.7M
93.50M
381.6M
73.02M
212.6M
140.5M
6.408M
37.44M
3.410M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Blubster
Direct Connect++
---
0.85%
0.23%
0.19%
0.15%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.470T
2.001T
1.650T
1.349T
266.4G
88.52G
45.34G
16.02G
4.165G
3.725G
1.504G
927.7M
367.7M
---
0.73%
0.30%
0.17%
0.18%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.429G
3.442G
1.978G
2.021G
303.0M
116.2M
87.55M
23.02M
6.576M
3.372M
1.768M
11.83M
296.7k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.33%
0.04%
0.00%
---
11.71T
354.9G
0.000
---
0.99%
0.24%
0.00%
---
11.36G
2.807G
0.000
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.51%
0.42%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.453T
3.667T
234.3G
49.73G
42.22G
15.04G
8.924G
1.022G
47.32M
---
0.49%
0.31%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.655G
3.542G
274.2M
62.48M
52.54M
23.38M
14.29M
3.626M
34.90k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.568T
384.9G
216.8G
200.2G
76.76G
28.41G
12.36G
---
0.19%
0.06%
0.10%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.229G
695.6M
1.110G
184.7M
193.6M
51.67M
24.81M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.44%
---
355.6T
---
37.43%
---
429.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
879.4T
---
100.00%
---
1.147T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 354.9G 0.24% 2.807G
IGMP[2]0.00% 60.48M 0.00% 1.610M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 61.58G 0.00% 55.54M
TCP[6]89.88% 790.4T 87.28% 1.001T
UDP[17]5.26% 46.26T 9.13% 104.7G
IPv6[41]0.03% 251.0G 0.03% 363.3M
GRE[47]4.22% 37.08T 2.64% 30.25G
ESP[50]0.56% 4.881T 0.65% 7.431G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.904G 0.00% 51.43M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 110.7G 0.02% 274.6M
Total100.00% 879.4T 100.00% 1.147T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.73% 467.2G
Medium (100-1400B)18.67% 214.1G
Large (1401-1500B)40.34% 462.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 3.057G
Total100.00% 1.147T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.65% 850.0T 97.09% 1.113T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.12% 1.037T 0.08% 956.6M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 46.94G 0.02% 207.3M
Other3.22% 28.34T 2.81% 32.19G
Total100.00% 879.4T 100.00% 1.147T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.48% 4.234T 0.26% 2.943G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19354.18% 36.72T 4.01% 45.94G
200001.59% 14.02T 1.09% 12.44G
200011.20% 10.57T 0.81% 9.252G
200020.94% 8.285T 0.63% 7.208G
200030.81% 7.097T 0.53% 6.116G