Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090803

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090803 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.84% of octets and 22.93% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.08M
5 1.498M 6 10.50M
10 1.620M 13 11.00M
50 3.654M 57 18.60M
90 18.21M 59 60.60M
95 29.50M 59 96.56M
99 80.70M 59 197.2M
99.9 188.5M 59 585.1M
99.99 633.9M 59 2.113G
99.999 3.573G 118 6.587G
100 14.95G 119 20.39G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.22% 5.398G
Medium (100-1400B)7.61% 18.54G
Large (1401-1500B)90.10% 219.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 171.9M
Total100.00% 243.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers36.25% 126.3T 36.05% 87.78G 42.71% 4.637M
Encrypted Traffic7.49% 26.12T 7.67% 18.66G 6.70% 727.7k
Advanced Apps4.14% 14.42T 4.05% 9.851G 5.37% 582.6k
Measurement2.11% 7.358T 2.38% 5.787G 0.21% 22.95k
File Sharing1.94% 6.757T 1.93% 4.692G 1.53% 165.7k
Misc0.64% 2.231T 0.73% 1.771G 1.20% 130.7k
Audio/Video0.23% 809.2G 0.23% 568.3M 0.46% 50.48k
Games0.15% 538.5G 0.15% 376.5M 0.21% 22.61k
Unidentified47.04% 163.9T 46.81% 113.9G 41.60% 4.517M
Total100.00% 348.5T 100.00% 243.4G 100.00% 10.85M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.076G858227INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.955G824411ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.428G824419ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.030G900015Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
979.7M150011Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
958.8M150021LLL-TIS [45]Abilene [11537]Iperf
953.6M150010Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
878.1M150017INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
866.3M150018APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
851.2M150016VANDERBILT [7212]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
967.5M900060ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Shoutcast
894.8M146410Boston U [111]U Chicago [160]36044 -> 24197
714.5M150032Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]54520 -> 36085
598.9M150014Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]37506 -> 50384
590.9M150011Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]36123 -> 20318
587.7M150033UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]45949 -> 23631
579.2M142010Microsoft London IDC [8075]U Wisconsin [59]HTTP
501.3M150047UNL [7896]U Florida [6356]42417 -> 48046
496.3M150054Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
476.4M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52258 -> 5101

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 840.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.68% 347.2T 42.98% 456.4G
Encrypted Traffic6.71% 55.89T 7.80% 82.82G
Advanced Apps2.86% 23.83T 2.57% 27.24G
Misc2.17% 18.05T 5.21% 55.29G
File Sharing1.61% 13.44T 1.57% 16.64G
Audio/Video1.19% 9.939T 1.02% 10.81G
Measurement1.18% 9.814T 1.08% 11.45G
Games0.28% 2.321T 0.40% 4.231G
Unidentified42.32% 352.5T 37.39% 397.0G
Total100.00% 833.1T 100.00% 1.061T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.67%
1.94%
0.61%
0.47%
---
322.1T
16.15T
5.080T
3.874T
---
40.37%
1.47%
0.59%
0.55%
---
428.7G
15.59G
6.316G
5.802G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.06%
3.05%
0.59%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.46T
25.44T
4.895T
77.28G
14.09G
---
3.05%
4.01%
0.72%
0.02%
0.01%
---
32.38G
42.60G
7.600G
180.3M
57.19M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.54%
0.23%
0.09%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.14T
1.918T
740.9G
26.30G
4.924G
1.789G
---
2.31%
0.19%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.50G
1.978G
622.5M
66.26M
53.17M
22.62M
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
NFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.39%
0.23%
0.21%
0.16%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.57T
1.936T
1.709T
1.344T
540.5G
318.8G
279.3G
90.79G
82.43G
55.73G
45.61G
25.13G
22.96G
16.79G
7.976G
2.201G
290.6M
---
2.60%
0.27%
1.29%
0.16%
0.08%
0.56%
0.05%
0.01%
0.04%
0.07%
0.03%
0.00%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.64G
2.872G
13.70G
1.702G
797.5M
5.975G
568.1M
112.6M
380.6M
731.9M
370.2M
52.71M
198.4M
135.2M
13.11M
35.65M
4.382M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
0.81%
0.28%
0.24%
0.23%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.783T
2.348T
2.033T
1.893T
204.7G
83.49G
76.82G
12.47G
6.466G
1.926G
742.9M
703.9M
359.4M
---
0.69%
0.28%
0.32%
0.23%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.298G
2.961G
3.370G
2.492G
252.4M
121.7M
112.0M
18.69M
7.906M
1.863M
8.594M
558.9k
458.2k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.58%
0.57%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.827T
4.739T
256.6G
45.61G
37.46G
19.51G
8.959G
4.907G
31.45M
---
0.43%
0.54%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.573G
5.786G
285.2M
62.30M
50.91M
22.58M
19.06M
11.22M
23.20k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.14%
0.04%
0.00%
---
9.466T
348.7G
0.000
---
0.82%
0.26%
0.00%
---
8.736G
2.722G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.17%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.432T
358.9G
240.0G
176.9G
72.60G
29.91G
10.92G
---
0.19%
0.06%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.011G
672.1M
1.169G
153.3M
159.1M
45.64M
20.30M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.32%
---
352.5T
---
37.39%
---
397.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
833.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.061T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 348.7G 0.26% 2.722G
IGMP[2]0.00% 48.53M 0.00% 1.393M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 59.28G 0.00% 50.24M
TCP[6]88.44% 736.8T 87.56% 929.8G
UDP[17]5.08% 42.31T 7.95% 84.41G
IPv6[41]0.03% 253.0G 0.03% 358.0M
GRE[47]5.80% 48.32T 3.46% 36.76G
ESP[50]0.59% 4.895T 0.72% 7.600G
AX.25[93]0.00% 74.40k 0.00% 900.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.041G 0.00% 52.31M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 77.52G 0.02% 182.2M
Total100.00% 833.1T 100.00% 1.061T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.49% 419.3G
Medium (100-1400B)18.46% 196.0G
Large (1401-1500B)40.99% 435.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.06% 11.23G
Total100.00% 1.061T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.53% 804.2T 96.95% 1.029T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.17% 1.390T 0.13% 1.432G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 54.44G 0.02% 240.5M
Other3.30% 27.46T 2.89% 30.68G
Total100.00% 833.1T 100.00% 1.061T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.72% 5.977T 0.39% 4.105G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19353.59% 29.91T 3.62% 38.41G
200002.30% 19.16T 1.61% 17.12G
200011.82% 15.14T 1.25% 13.23G
200021.43% 11.91T 0.98% 10.36G
200031.12% 9.316T 0.76% 8.097G