Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090727

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090727 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/4 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.88% of octets and 21.15% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 2 10.05M
5 1.494M 7 10.50M
10 1.619M 14 10.95M
50 3.569M 58 18.64M
90 16.15M 59 57.33M
95 31.22M 59 86.18M
99 86.24M 59 240.3M
99.9 279.4M 59 1.180G
99.99 794.5M 59 2.453G
99.999 4.469G 60 9.128G
100 49.46G 64 51.20G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.68% 6.588G
Medium (100-1400B)8.39% 20.58G
Large (1401-1500B)88.78% 217.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.15% 372.4M
Total100.00% 245.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.86% 111.5T 32.22% 79.11G 40.34% 4.193M
Encrypted Traffic12.87% 45.05T 13.28% 32.60G 9.20% 956.6k
Advanced Apps5.17% 18.08T 5.00% 12.26G 6.99% 726.4k
Measurement3.43% 12.00T 3.82% 9.388G 0.37% 38.45k
File Sharing2.20% 7.716T 2.15% 5.289G 1.88% 195.5k
Misc0.72% 2.515T 0.82% 2.020G 1.45% 150.7k
Games0.15% 518.7G 0.15% 366.4M 0.22% 22.40k
Audio/Video0.13% 460.6G 0.13% 329.8M 0.31% 32.42k
Unidentified43.47% 152.2T 42.41% 104.1G 39.24% 4.079M
Total100.00% 350.1T 100.00% 245.5G 100.00% 10.39M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.968G818820Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
7.782G900017Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
7.187G816720Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
4.837G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.593G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
993.8M149912Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
986.9M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
971.4M150014Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
906.0M150024INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf
809.0M150014Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.856G900020Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5099 -> 5099
7.234G819420Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5056 -> 5056
1.023G900021Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5016 -> 5016
973.2M150014Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
503.4M150014Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
468.4M150038Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]52690 -> 43086
463.5M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]59928 -> 5101
446.4M149912Merit [237]NCREN [81]HTTP
437.4M150025Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
436.5M150030Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]58515 -> 50384

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 819.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.73% 357.3T 44.17% 512.6G
Encrypted Traffic9.61% 82.33T 9.61% 111.5G
Advanced Apps3.35% 28.70T 2.76% 32.06G
Misc2.50% 21.38T 5.41% 62.83G
File Sharing1.76% 15.04T 1.56% 18.14G
Measurement1.59% 13.63T 1.27% 14.77G
Audio/Video0.87% 7.491T 0.78% 9.049G
Games0.26% 2.249T 0.40% 4.643G
Unidentified38.32% 328.2T 34.02% 394.8G
Total100.00% 856.4T 100.00% 1.160T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.06%
1.85%
0.48%
0.34%
---
334.5T
15.86T
4.118T
2.886T
---
41.66%
1.51%
0.50%
0.50%
---
483.5G
17.56G
5.793G
5.791G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
5.34%
3.02%
1.24%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.73T
25.85T
10.63T
95.47G
12.88G
---
4.63%
3.82%
1.14%
0.02%
0.00%
---
53.69G
44.33G
13.25G
211.8M
55.75M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.25%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.82T
494.0G
285.6G
63.87G
31.87G
975.9M
---
2.68%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
31.11G
442.5M
342.6M
62.61M
86.97M
10.96M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.64%
0.30%
0.24%
0.18%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.05T
2.571T
2.036T
1.568T
318.4G
231.8G
192.2G
118.9G
95.93G
59.55G
48.26G
30.21G
23.73G
16.64G
14.69G
2.406G
227.2M
---
2.75%
1.65%
0.26%
0.14%
0.05%
0.04%
0.29%
0.01%
0.05%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
31.89G
19.15G
3.030G
1.618G
618.8M
515.6M
3.412G
157.4M
621.8M
781.8M
417.0M
92.24M
327.7M
136.0M
19.21M
39.24M
2.672M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.06%
0.29%
0.20%
0.16%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.044T
2.454T
1.721T
1.401T
245.3G
79.96G
78.39G
17.74G
1.976G
1.627G
1.531G
1.383G
15.29M
---
0.80%
0.36%
0.20%
0.16%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.255G
4.165G
2.263G
1.862G
302.0M
128.3M
120.1M
21.65M
14.68M
4.645M
1.955M
1.307M
138.4k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.55%
0.08%
0.00%
---
13.24T
674.7G
0.000
---
1.04%
0.40%
0.00%
---
12.12G
4.632G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.53%
0.29%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.561T
2.500T
317.4G
50.31G
39.19G
11.19G
9.100G
2.600G
40.10M
---
0.37%
0.35%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.310G
4.086G
341.9M
103.2M
55.71M
129.0M
17.32M
5.615M
29.57k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.15%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.314T
413.7G
256.6G
159.4G
74.69G
17.45G
13.17G
---
0.19%
0.07%
0.11%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.162G
773.2M
1.242G
170.9M
230.3M
28.95M
34.24M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.32%
---
328.2T
---
34.02%
---
394.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
856.4T
---
100.00%
---
1.160T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.08% 674.7G 0.40% 4.632G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.18M 0.00% 1.374M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 73.06G 0.01% 62.95M
TCP[6]91.93% 787.3T 89.27% 1.036T
UDP[17]4.57% 39.13T 7.94% 92.14G
IPv6[41]0.05% 407.3G 0.05% 523.8M
GRE[47]2.14% 18.33T 1.35% 15.64G
ESP[50]1.24% 10.63T 1.14% 13.25G
AX.25[93]0.00% 73.50k 0.00% 875.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.074G 0.00% 52.13M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 95.71G 0.02% 213.7M
Total100.00% 856.4T 100.00% 1.160T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.82% 496.9G
Medium (100-1400B)18.01% 208.9G
Large (1401-1500B)38.92% 451.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.26% 2.987G
Total100.00% 1.160T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]93.83% 803.5T 95.62% 1.109T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.31% 2.631T 0.18% 2.042G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 55.02G 0.02% 263.2M
Other5.86% 50.19T 4.18% 48.48G
Total100.00% 856.4T 100.00% 1.160T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.85% 7.314T 0.43% 5.013G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19350.79% 6.755T 1.41% 16.32G
200000.47% 4.039T 0.37% 4.321G
21280.38% 3.278T 0.34% 3.986G
200010.27% 2.296T 0.19% 2.246G
514130.25% 2.132T 0.17% 1.954G