Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090720

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090720 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.16% of octets and 20.39% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 2 10.05M
5 1.480M 8 10.50M
10 1.591M 15 10.95M
50 3.346M 58 18.15M
90 14.15M 59 50.86M
95 25.94M 59 73.05M
99 78.28M 59 178.8M
99.9 198.3M 59 632.0M
99.99 871.4M 59 2.591G
99.999 5.752G 60 10.25G
100 23.08G 62 56.92G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.88% 6.076G
Medium (100-1400B)7.60% 16.03G
Large (1401-1500B)89.28% 188.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.25% 525.1M
Total100.00% 211.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.13% 97.21T 32.19% 67.93G 36.74% 3.735M
Encrypted Traffic11.21% 33.91T 12.01% 25.33G 9.10% 924.9k
Advanced Apps4.70% 14.21T 4.60% 9.705G 5.24% 533.2k
Measurement4.65% 14.05T 5.07% 10.69G 0.44% 44.48k
File Sharing2.77% 8.376T 2.68% 5.654G 2.50% 254.1k
Misc0.72% 2.167T 0.80% 1.691G 1.28% 130.2k
Games0.15% 454.2G 0.15% 321.9M 0.20% 20.30k
Audio/Video0.15% 446.5G 0.15% 326.6M 0.31% 31.07k
Unidentified43.54% 131.7T 42.35% 89.36G 44.19% 4.493M
Total100.00% 302.5T 100.00% 211.0G 100.00% 10.16M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.479G900030Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
7.899G817320Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
7.501G900019Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
4.678G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.508G824419ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.003G150015Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
966.6M150014Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
902.3M150013Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
638.8M150028Unknown [32361]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
590.5M150014INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.405G879215Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5093 -> 5093
8.082G819115Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5051 -> 5051
1.000G900043Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5013 -> 5013
890.1M150014Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
715.7M150012U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]4161 -> 64558
591.4M150021Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]53964 -> 50384
561.9M898910High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]40910 -> 5101
500.8M150056Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
484.6M150014Unknown [0]Unknown [27274]HTTP
416.9M150017Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 813.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.98% 301.1T 41.00% 424.4G
Encrypted Traffic8.20% 63.38T 8.38% 86.69G
Advanced Apps3.16% 24.44T 2.73% 28.28G
Misc2.38% 18.36T 5.47% 56.57G
Measurement2.01% 15.51T 1.61% 16.67G
File Sharing1.95% 15.03T 1.69% 17.47G
Audio/Video1.06% 8.183T 0.88% 9.113G
Games0.27% 2.052T 0.42% 4.388G
Unidentified41.99% 324.4T 37.82% 391.4G
Total100.00% 772.5T 100.00% 1.035T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
36.06%
2.04%
0.54%
0.35%
---
278.5T
15.74T
4.177T
2.692T
---
38.37%
1.53%
0.62%
0.48%
---
397.1G
15.83G
6.447G
4.984G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.45%
2.90%
0.85%
0.01%
0.00%
---
34.34T
22.40T
6.552T
71.88G
15.11G
---
3.93%
3.55%
0.87%
0.02%
0.01%
---
40.67G
36.76G
9.025G
174.8M
56.76M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
3.09%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.86T
428.5G
102.6G
32.75G
9.969G
6.209G
---
2.66%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
27.55G
407.3M
112.6M
90.59M
52.67M
63.14M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
NFS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.54%
0.31%
0.25%
0.14%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.86T
2.388T
1.895T
1.070T
402.0G
213.0G
205.6G
126.9G
56.95G
47.11G
24.62G
22.77G
22.70G
16.39G
9.062G
2.495G
316.1M
---
2.70%
1.63%
0.28%
0.10%
0.07%
0.38%
0.06%
0.08%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.97G
16.82G
2.878G
1.076G
715.4M
3.885G
571.5M
842.9M
748.1M
391.5M
342.7M
78.04M
52.08M
133.4M
11.59M
38.57M
2.881M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.93%
0.07%
0.00%
---
14.94T
571.3G
0.000
---
1.31%
0.30%
0.00%
---
13.53G
3.140G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.28%
0.27%
0.21%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.926T
2.075T
1.660T
964.7G
239.6G
84.56G
57.88G
17.87G
2.583G
1.537G
1.133G
583.9M
15.90M
---
0.97%
0.35%
0.20%
0.12%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.989G
3.572G
2.070G
1.270G
310.9M
127.2M
91.61M
22.24M
15.51M
3.942M
1.335M
1.012M
40.10k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.72%
0.30%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.578T
2.300T
178.5G
72.96G
31.17G
8.908G
7.515G
5.540G
241.6M
---
0.50%
0.34%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.144G
3.524G
206.7M
112.3M
49.83M
16.41M
49.47M
9.382M
178.2k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.15%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.149T
387.9G
238.0G
142.3G
67.86G
40.51G
25.64G
---
0.19%
0.07%
0.12%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.949G
734.6M
1.262G
153.6M
200.4M
56.17M
31.57M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.99%
---
324.4T
---
37.82%
---
391.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
772.5T
---
100.00%
---
1.035T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 571.3G 0.30% 3.140G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.56M 0.00% 1.388M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 73.37G 0.01% 67.51M
TCP[6]88.78% 685.8T 86.50% 895.4G
UDP[17]5.96% 46.07T 9.71% 100.5G
IPv6[41]0.06% 431.8G 0.05% 523.8M
GRE[47]4.26% 32.93T 2.53% 26.19G
ESP[50]0.85% 6.552T 0.87% 9.025G
AX.25[93]0.00% 142.8k 0.00% 1.600k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.072G 0.01% 52.19M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 72.09G 0.02% 176.4M
Total100.00% 772.5T 100.00% 1.035T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.33% 438.1G
Medium (100-1400B)18.08% 187.1G
Large (1401-1500B)38.84% 402.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.75% 7.778G
Total100.00% 1.035T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.68% 731.5T 95.92% 992.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.36% 2.762T 0.18% 1.819G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 36.22G 0.02% 177.4M
Other4.95% 38.26T 3.89% 40.22G
Total100.00% 772.5T 100.00% 1.035T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.04% 8.071T 0.53% 5.524G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330012.06% 15.94T 1.04% 10.71G
19351.22% 9.432T 2.20% 22.73G
21280.63% 4.834T 0.58% 5.978G
200000.56% 4.354T 0.40% 4.145G
21800.45% 3.491T 0.30% 3.136G