Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090713

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090713 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.84% of octets and 19.98% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 2 10.05M
5 1.491M 7 10.50M
10 1.611M 13 10.95M
50 3.400M 58 18.22M
90 17.10M 59 52.05M
95 30.80M 59 76.56M
99 83.88M 59 178.2M
99.9 186.1M 59 638.8M
99.99 856.6M 59 2.543G
99.999 5.674G 60 10.04G
100 44.43G 63 58.27G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.04% 4.120G
Medium (100-1400B)8.40% 16.95G
Large (1401-1500B)89.29% 180.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.27% 544.2M
Total100.00% 201.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers36.56% 106.3T 36.71% 74.10G 40.42% 3.940M
Encrypted Traffic10.68% 31.09T 10.82% 21.83G 8.59% 837.0k
Measurement4.22% 12.28T 4.63% 9.354G 0.42% 41.10k
Advanced Apps4.22% 12.27T 4.16% 8.401G 4.68% 456.3k
File Sharing2.41% 7.013T 2.38% 4.794G 2.11% 205.7k
Misc0.88% 2.573T 1.04% 2.107G 1.52% 148.3k
Audio/Video0.17% 486.3G 0.17% 351.1M 0.33% 32.49k
Games0.15% 433.3G 0.15% 300.8M 0.20% 19.72k
Unidentified40.71% 118.4T 39.93% 80.59G 41.72% 4.067M
Total100.00% 291.0T 100.00% 201.8G 100.00% 9.749M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.116G819118Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
8.078G820520Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
8.042G900039Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.639G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.500G824419ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.009G149910Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
966.1M150021Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
934.5M149918Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
911.1M150055U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]Iperf
880.5M150014Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.380G818710Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5092 -> 5092
7.541G819220Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5060 -> 5060
973.9M898454Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5014 -> 5014
896.2M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
729.7M150016Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]35742 -> 49552
563.2M150021Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]51441 -> 50384
522.3M898810High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]36003 -> 5101
494.9M150012Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
452.4M150017Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
439.9M150019UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]34028 -> 24468

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 759.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.99% 307.1T 42.41% 428.3G
Encrypted Traffic8.32% 62.34T 8.26% 83.46G
Advanced Apps2.91% 21.83T 2.53% 25.51G
Misc2.61% 19.55T 5.85% 59.08G
File Sharing2.00% 14.99T 1.85% 18.72G
Measurement1.91% 14.31T 1.68% 16.93G
Audio/Video0.76% 5.713T 0.73% 7.410G
Games0.29% 2.138T 0.45% 4.507G
Unidentified40.20% 301.2T 36.25% 366.1G
Total100.00% 749.3T 100.00% 1.010T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.26%
1.94%
0.51%
0.28%
---
286.6T
14.56T
3.794T
2.130T
---
40.01%
1.41%
0.56%
0.44%
---
404.1G
14.23G
5.610G
4.395G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.21%
2.97%
1.13%
0.01%
0.00%
---
31.51T
22.28T
8.435T
96.80G
12.46G
---
3.55%
3.60%
1.09%
0.02%
0.01%
---
35.88G
36.31G
10.98G
214.1M
51.91M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.79%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.92T
609.6G
192.6G
66.19G
34.35G
3.304G
---
2.44%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.62G
531.9M
165.6M
68.65M
89.97M
38.06M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
MS Windows
NFS
AFS
IRC
RTIP
NTP
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.65%
0.27%
0.25%
0.24%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.35T
2.047T
1.895T
1.821T
419.3G
271.1G
250.0G
184.6G
114.1G
62.13G
55.25G
26.70G
24.50G
16.46G
9.070G
3.559G
835.3M
---
2.90%
1.59%
0.28%
0.15%
0.08%
0.50%
0.03%
0.05%
0.09%
0.06%
0.07%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.33G
16.06G
2.823G
1.519G
770.2M
5.004G
321.6M
481.1M
894.4M
568.4M
725.4M
77.42M
309.8M
134.6M
14.18M
40.73M
3.220M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.03%
0.38%
0.29%
0.25%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.738T
2.862T
2.142T
1.866T
229.8G
76.05G
64.66G
12.61G
3.370G
2.358G
1.413G
52.81M
11.33M
---
0.79%
0.43%
0.36%
0.23%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.957G
4.296G
3.596G
2.308G
299.1M
128.2M
94.67M
18.37M
5.517M
3.157M
13.31M
414.7k
41.80k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.76%
0.15%
0.00%
---
13.20T
1.111T
0.000
---
1.17%
0.50%
0.00%
---
11.86G
5.064G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.41%
0.31%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.060T
2.344T
170.3G
64.26G
37.80G
16.43G
16.12G
2.907G
190.7M
---
0.31%
0.36%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.135G
3.640G
207.3M
171.3M
60.21M
161.9M
26.44M
6.310M
140.7k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.17%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.295T
375.6G
242.3G
99.58G
85.96G
21.57G
17.59G
---
0.21%
0.07%
0.12%
0.01%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.155G
707.1M
1.256G
113.9M
197.8M
34.09M
41.82M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.20%
---
301.2T
---
36.25%
---
366.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
749.3T
---
100.00%
---
1.010T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.15% 1.111T 0.50% 5.064G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.49M 0.00% 1.379M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 75.49G 0.01% 61.88M
TCP[6]88.34% 661.9T 85.87% 867.4G
UDP[17]5.70% 42.73T 9.80% 98.98G
IPv6[41]0.03% 193.7G 0.02% 251.3M
GRE[47]4.63% 34.71T 2.68% 27.10G
ESP[50]1.13% 8.435T 1.09% 10.98G
AX.25[93]0.00% 19.80k 0.00% 300.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.151G 0.01% 53.92M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 96.92G 0.02% 215.0M
Total100.00% 749.3T 100.00% 1.010T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.01% 424.4G
Medium (100-1400B)19.13% 193.2G
Large (1401-1500B)37.95% 383.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.90% 9.101G
Total100.00% 1.010T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.93% 711.3T 95.91% 968.8G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.32% 2.363T 0.17% 1.741G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 45.49G 0.02% 209.6M
Other4.74% 35.54T 3.90% 39.37G
Total100.00% 749.3T 100.00% 1.010T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.91% 6.811T 0.46% 4.684G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.45% 10.85T 2.46% 24.82G
330010.84% 6.273T 0.42% 4.213G
200000.81% 6.097T 0.51% 5.146G
200010.72% 5.390T 0.44% 4.421G
200020.66% 4.914T 0.39% 3.943G