Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090706

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090706 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.21% of octets and 20.12% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 2 10.08M
5 1.480M 9 10.50M
10 1.578M 16 10.95M
50 3.082M 58 16.95M
90 14.26M 59 54.00M
95 23.66M 59 80.55M
99 72.33M 59 161.3M
99.9 181.0M 59 556.2M
99.99 883.2M 59 2.545G
99.999 5.995G 60 10.49G
100 24.60G 62 59.69G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.16% 4.563G
Medium (100-1400B)8.30% 17.57G
Large (1401-1500B)89.30% 188.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.24% 510.5M
Total100.00% 211.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.98% 109.3T 35.92% 76.00G 39.35% 4.121M
Encrypted Traffic8.61% 26.18T 8.80% 18.61G 7.31% 765.7k
Measurement7.22% 21.93T 7.61% 16.09G 8.79% 920.4k
Advanced Apps4.32% 13.12T 4.28% 9.045G 4.54% 475.4k
File Sharing2.38% 7.236T 2.34% 4.955G 1.89% 197.8k
Misc0.84% 2.558T 0.90% 1.914G 1.44% 151.2k
Games0.22% 681.6G 0.22% 468.6M 0.34% 36.11k
Audio/Video0.16% 496.9G 0.17% 360.5M 0.30% 31.72k
Unidentified40.26% 122.3T 39.76% 84.12G 36.03% 3.774M
Total100.00% 303.8T 100.00% 211.5G 100.00% 10.47M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.155G900054Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
7.984G900011Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]Abilene [11537]Iperf
7.924G817020Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
7.560G819020Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
4.822G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.510G824413ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.733G900030Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
1.385G150030U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
999.9M150014Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
969.8M150010Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.173G821617Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5090 -> 5090
8.049G815712Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5011 -> 5011
1.015G897021Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
998.6M900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Shoutcast
749.1M150012Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]59295 -> 36321
678.4M150060Abilene [11537]UMDNET [27]Shoutcast
661.4M149712Argonne [683]Unknown [0]HTTP
614.5M150025Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]22934 -> 44472
564.8M150014Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]59813 -> 50384
478.4M150025UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]45196 -> 22255

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 846.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.51% 313.6T 41.17% 432.9G
Encrypted Traffic7.12% 53.82T 7.40% 77.80G
Measurement3.35% 25.35T 2.70% 28.42G
Advanced Apps2.93% 22.11T 2.44% 25.63G
Misc2.38% 18.01T 6.10% 64.19G
File Sharing1.98% 14.96T 1.72% 18.05G
Audio/Video0.84% 6.336T 0.76% 7.972G
Games0.36% 2.712T 0.51% 5.415G
Unidentified39.53% 298.7T 37.20% 391.1G
Total100.00% 755.7T 100.00% 1.051T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.88%
1.75%
0.49%
0.39%
---
293.8T
13.20T
3.692T
2.964T
---
38.80%
1.24%
0.63%
0.49%
---
408.0G
13.08G
6.611G
5.152G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.53%
2.98%
0.60%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.65T
22.53T
4.539T
87.82G
11.17G
---
3.27%
3.44%
0.67%
0.02%
0.00%
---
34.37G
36.15G
7.029G
200.8M
50.32M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.24%
0.12%
0.00%
---
24.45T
893.8G
0.000
---
2.29%
0.42%
0.00%
---
24.03G
4.389G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
McIDAS
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.81%
0.06%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.23T
432.6G
364.3G
44.86G
39.39G
1.167G
---
2.36%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.82G
301.2M
353.2M
68.02M
85.89M
3.961M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
RTIP
NTP
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.62%
0.30%
0.25%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.20T
2.252T
1.899T
399.6G
356.3G
279.2G
260.7G
79.61G
74.97G
62.39G
56.07G
28.92G
23.62G
16.78G
8.334G
3.628G
850.5M
---
2.73%
2.22%
0.28%
0.07%
0.06%
0.05%
0.46%
0.04%
0.01%
0.06%
0.07%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.73G
23.31G
2.966G
744.7M
636.4M
552.5M
4.789G
469.1M
141.1M
587.2M
736.1M
60.78M
269.5M
137.2M
10.60M
44.09M
3.957M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
1.10%
0.28%
0.28%
0.25%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.278T
2.147T
2.138T
1.921T
314.8G
75.30G
66.07G
12.82G
3.221G
1.676G
1.379G
550.5M
183.9M
---
0.83%
0.26%
0.34%
0.23%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.739G
2.682G
3.582G
2.377G
395.2M
138.1M
93.88M
19.73M
4.872M
4.322M
14.12M
418.1k
842.5k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.48%
0.31%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.630T
2.365T
163.6G
85.45G
60.32G
13.93G
11.93G
4.942G
10.71M
---
0.34%
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.611G
3.769G
205.5M
94.75M
137.2M
20.22M
123.4M
11.10M
7.900k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.780T
458.2G
237.2G
119.5G
88.64G
19.44G
9.282G
---
0.28%
0.08%
0.12%
0.01%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.904G
855.9M
1.221G
141.4M
218.6M
55.48M
17.64M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.53%
---
298.7T
---
37.20%
---
391.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
755.7T
---
100.00%
---
1.051T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.12% 893.8G 0.42% 4.389G
IGMP[2]0.00% 46.56M 0.00% 1.354M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 90.00G 0.01% 94.86M
TCP[6]90.03% 680.3T 85.00% 893.8G
UDP[17]5.74% 43.36T 11.84% 124.5G
IPv6[41]0.03% 227.3G 0.03% 285.7M
GRE[47]3.46% 26.15T 2.01% 21.17G
ESP[50]0.60% 4.539T 0.67% 7.029G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.286G 0.01% 53.47M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 87.89G 0.02% 201.3M
Total100.00% 755.7T 100.00% 1.051T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.72% 459.7G
Medium (100-1400B)18.74% 197.0G
Large (1401-1500B)36.94% 388.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.60% 6.298G
Total100.00% 1.051T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.78% 723.8T 96.45% 1.014T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.33% 2.458T 0.15% 1.627G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 38.93G 0.02% 184.2M
Other3.89% 29.37T 3.38% 35.55G
Total100.00% 755.7T 100.00% 1.051T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.74% 5.623T 0.37% 3.902G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.79% 13.52T 2.82% 29.67G
82470.82% 6.222T 0.95% 9.969G
200000.58% 4.366T 0.37% 3.873G
21280.54% 4.050T 0.48% 5.091G
200010.47% 3.573T 0.30% 3.116G