Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090629

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090629 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.95% of octets and 22.29% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 2 10.08M
5 1.473M 9 10.50M
10 1.561M 17 10.93M
50 2.951M 58 16.50M
90 12.61M 59 47.04M
95 21.14M 59 68.72M
99 79.51M 59 164.8M
99.9 173.8M 59 615.4M
99.99 870.4M 59 2.402G
99.999 5.010G 60 10.02G
100 94.70G 62 57.15G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.41% 5.009G
Medium (100-1400B)8.27% 17.18G
Large (1401-1500B)89.11% 185.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.22% 452.1M
Total100.00% 207.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.85% 103.7T 34.73% 72.20G 37.78% 4.096M
Encrypted Traffic10.05% 29.92T 10.21% 21.23G 6.99% 758.0k
Measurement9.03% 26.89T 9.60% 19.96G 11.72% 1.271M
Advanced Apps4.55% 13.54T 4.49% 9.340G 4.55% 493.7k
File Sharing2.34% 6.976T 2.30% 4.788G 1.76% 191.3k
Misc0.82% 2.447T 0.97% 2.018G 1.30% 140.6k
Games0.20% 582.0G 0.20% 410.7M 0.23% 25.27k
Audio/Video0.14% 428.3G 0.15% 307.8M 0.26% 28.69k
Unidentified38.02% 113.2T 37.35% 77.66G 35.40% 3.838M
Total100.00% 297.8T 100.00% 207.9G 100.00% 10.84M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.054G900026Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
7.750G815419Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
7.391G900020Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
5.808G900018UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.858G824412ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.473G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.004G150014Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
971.4M150013Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
961.4M150023Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
948.5M900053APAN-JP [7660]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.243G900011Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5087 -> 5087
8.174G822715Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5075 -> 5075
997.9M896219Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5017 -> 5017
635.4M150059Abilene [11537]PSC [1207]Shoutcast
553.8M149917Argonne [683]U Minnesota [217]HTTP
535.1M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]38681 -> 5101
424.6M150011Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
418.0M150017Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
401.4M150012Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
362.3M149739CERN1 [1297]BT Customer services network [2614]58893 -> 1093

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 881.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.65% 288.9T 41.53% 387.4G
Encrypted Traffic8.41% 57.02T 8.34% 77.82G
Measurement4.45% 30.16T 3.49% 32.53G
Advanced Apps3.44% 23.29T 2.82% 26.27G
Misc2.47% 16.73T 6.27% 58.53G
File Sharing1.95% 13.21T 1.78% 16.62G
Audio/Video0.91% 6.198T 0.77% 7.225G
Games0.34% 2.334T 0.49% 4.566G
Unidentified35.37% 239.6T 34.50% 321.8G
Total100.00% 677.6T 100.00% 932.8G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.24%
2.32%
0.56%
0.53%
---
265.8T
15.70T
3.824T
3.581T
---
38.64%
1.68%
0.64%
0.57%
---
360.4G
15.71G
5.943G
5.315G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.49%
3.16%
0.75%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.45T
21.41T
5.063T
77.07G
11.43G
---
4.02%
3.51%
0.78%
0.02%
0.01%
---
37.50G
32.76G
7.316G
181.9M
49.37M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
4.40%
0.05%
0.00%
---
29.80T
358.2G
0.000
---
3.19%
0.30%
0.00%
---
29.77G
2.754G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.36%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.75T
253.3G
205.9G
63.73G
23.40G
1.395G
---
2.76%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.71G
270.4M
122.6M
98.63M
60.14M
3.422M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
MS Windows
NFS
AFS
Port 0
IRC
RTIP
NTP
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.65%
0.30%
0.26%
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.19T
2.046T
1.787T
660.3G
256.8G
188.1G
167.5G
159.9G
77.23G
64.15G
56.01G
23.66G
22.11G
16.79G
6.802G
6.225G
308.8M
---
2.97%
2.01%
0.31%
0.12%
0.51%
0.02%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.07%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.68G
18.78G
2.875G
1.144G
4.776G
190.1M
468.4M
337.0M
388.3M
615.6M
735.5M
280.7M
51.22M
137.8M
48.28M
10.30M
4.283M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Direct Connect++
Neo-Modus
---
0.98%
0.31%
0.30%
0.29%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.670T
2.090T
2.041T
1.934T
311.7G
86.70G
60.96G
11.40G
8.540G
2.077G
1.013G
208.5M
106.8M
---
0.80%
0.37%
0.27%
0.27%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.462G
3.431G
2.546G
2.556G
365.0M
133.7M
87.54M
16.70M
12.50M
2.176M
10.95M
179.8k
608.5k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.54%
0.33%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.676T
2.260T
157.4G
43.42G
42.28G
8.368G
7.518G
2.791G
26.98M
---
0.38%
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.536G
3.343G
193.2M
54.00M
62.25M
14.68M
14.25M
6.716M
19.90k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.341T
454.5G
229.6G
179.4G
97.80G
16.46G
15.00G
---
0.23%
0.08%
0.12%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.152G
790.4M
1.145G
191.5M
218.4M
38.72M
28.57M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
35.37%
---
239.6T
---
34.50%
---
321.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
677.6T
---
100.00%
---
932.8G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 358.2G 0.30% 2.754G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.20M 0.00% 1.376M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 75.89G 0.01% 79.59M
TCP[6]92.19% 624.7T 87.64% 817.6G
UDP[17]5.90% 40.01T 10.45% 97.47G
IPv6[41]0.05% 344.4G 0.05% 430.8M
GRE[47]1.03% 7.011T 0.75% 6.971G
ESP[50]0.75% 5.063T 0.78% 7.316G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.340G 0.01% 52.76M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 77.12G 0.02% 182.3M
Total100.00% 677.6T 100.00% 932.8G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.30% 403.9G
Medium (100-1400B)18.74% 174.7G
Large (1401-1500B)37.86% 353.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 945.5M
Total100.00% 932.8G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]94.82% 642.5T 95.91% 894.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.34% 2.331T 0.15% 1.361G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 35.87G 0.02% 165.3M
Other4.84% 32.76T 3.93% 36.63G
Total100.00% 677.6T 100.00% 932.8G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.82% 5.525T 0.42% 3.872G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.70% 11.50T 2.37% 22.11G
21280.63% 4.283T 0.58% 5.368G
200000.50% 3.387T 0.34% 3.171G
26300.50% 3.387T 0.19% 1.732G
21800.46% 3.093T 0.33% 3.073G