Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090615

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090615 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.65% of octets and 24.14% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 3 10.08M
5 1.508M 10 10.50M
10 1.645M 18 11.10M
50 3.596M 58 19.35M
90 14.09M 59 53.67M
95 24.05M 59 83.55M
99 68.19M 59 214.6M
99.9 345.9M 59 928.9M
99.99 965.0M 59 3.796G
99.999 4.750G 59 9.362G
100 83.56G 62 59.11G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.04% 7.984G
Medium (100-1400B)7.17% 18.85G
Large (1401-1500B)89.49% 235.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.30% 789.3M
Total100.00% 262.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.28% 106.3T 28.12% 73.93G 37.92% 4.345M
Measurement12.35% 46.42T 13.39% 35.21G 7.31% 837.3k
Encrypted Traffic9.65% 36.30T 9.87% 25.94G 7.80% 893.4k
Advanced Apps4.24% 15.96T 4.20% 11.03G 5.41% 620.0k
File Sharing2.24% 8.437T 2.29% 6.034G 1.92% 219.6k
Misc0.76% 2.875T 0.81% 2.141G 1.40% 160.1k
Games0.18% 664.8G 0.20% 528.0M 0.23% 26.61k
Audio/Video0.13% 499.9G 0.14% 361.7M 0.29% 33.29k
Unidentified42.16% 158.5T 40.99% 107.7G 37.73% 4.322M
Total100.00% 376.0T 100.00% 262.9G 100.00% 11.45M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.305G839520Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
8.182G900036Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
6.903G807615Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
5.036G824414ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.420G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.177G900019DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
998.1M149812Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
997.6M150016U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
980.9M150015Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
976.1M149110SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.140G818618Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5028 -> 5028
7.975G900010Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5030 -> 5030
1.057G150022Unknown [25776]Brookhaven National Lab [43]58397 -> 20000
965.4M150017Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5030 -> 5030
717.5M150010Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]59890 -> 50386
662.6M149810U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
642.5M150013Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]38834 -> 50395
610.8M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5037 -> 5037
544.4M150038Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]51804 -> 58038
492.8M150010Merit [237]Abilene [11537]5011 -> 5011

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 922.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers38.65% 318.4T 39.76% 433.2G
Encrypted Traffic8.61% 70.90T 8.83% 96.20G
Measurement6.12% 50.44T 4.74% 51.62G
Advanced Apps3.32% 27.33T 2.81% 30.66G
Misc2.60% 21.41T 5.54% 60.34G
File Sharing1.90% 15.64T 1.78% 19.42G
Audio/Video0.82% 6.736T 0.79% 8.641G
Games0.29% 2.414T 0.42% 4.611G
Unidentified37.69% 310.5T 35.32% 384.8G
Total100.00% 823.8T 100.00% 1.089T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
35.68%
2.02%
0.55%
0.40%
---
293.9T
16.64T
4.514T
3.336T
---
37.17%
1.54%
0.58%
0.48%
---
404.9G
16.75G
6.332G
5.178G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.51%
2.97%
1.11%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.18T
24.50T
9.107T
73.27G
24.12G
---
4.14%
3.61%
1.06%
0.02%
0.01%
---
45.10G
39.29G
11.54G
177.4M
78.85M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
6.08%
0.04%
0.00%
---
50.09T
355.5G
0.000
---
4.49%
0.25%
0.00%
---
48.88G
2.739G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.26%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
26.89T
251.4G
78.84G
49.01G
41.05G
14.65G
---
2.76%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.05G
302.3M
62.57M
103.9M
103.0M
33.80M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
NFS
MS Windows
AFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.60%
0.33%
0.24%
0.22%
0.08%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.21T
2.689T
1.992T
1.799T
656.0G
347.4G
235.4G
204.5G
73.05G
58.76G
45.85G
33.13G
22.40G
20.07G
15.27G
3.811G
524.2M
---
2.75%
0.21%
1.53%
0.27%
0.09%
0.05%
0.40%
0.05%
0.03%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.00%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.92G
2.258G
16.71G
2.945G
956.9M
523.1M
4.311G
593.8M
373.8M
770.0M
356.8M
327.5M
48.41M
172.0M
21.80M
44.83M
4.860M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.07%
0.30%
0.23%
0.21%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.810T
2.444T
1.908T
1.708T
571.2G
113.2G
60.25G
13.37G
9.479G
1.259G
806.8M
70.75M
33.69M
---
0.84%
0.37%
0.30%
0.19%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.185G
4.039G
3.255G
2.027G
637.9M
132.8M
106.9M
17.90M
12.66M
1.742M
8.965M
254.5k
91.20k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.46%
0.32%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.809T
2.609T
144.8G
73.29G
48.66G
30.63G
18.49G
2.357G
15.32M
---
0.33%
0.36%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
3.556G
3.945G
190.4M
341.8M
60.72M
515.5M
24.69M
5.493M
11.30k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.484T
425.1G
219.2G
167.7G
83.31G
22.14G
12.63G
---
0.21%
0.07%
0.11%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.279G
722.1M
1.153G
189.7M
195.4M
46.69M
23.65M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.69%
---
310.5T
---
35.32%
---
384.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
823.8T
---
100.00%
---
1.089T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 355.5G 0.25% 2.739G
IGMP[2]0.00% 46.40M 0.00% 1.247M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 73.04G 0.01% 77.25M
TCP[6]91.75% 755.9T 88.24% 961.4G
UDP[17]5.63% 46.41T 9.44% 102.8G
IPv6[41]0.05% 436.8G 0.05% 535.7M
GRE[47]1.39% 11.49T 0.93% 10.12G
ESP[50]1.11% 9.107T 1.06% 11.54G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.287G 0.00% 53.28M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 73.34G 0.02% 177.9M
Total100.00% 823.8T 100.00% 1.089T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.51% 452.2G
Medium (100-1400B)18.33% 199.7G
Large (1401-1500B)39.93% 435.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.23% 2.510G
Total100.00% 1.089T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.69% 788.3T 96.61% 1.052T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.25% 2.060T 0.08% 855.1M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 43.28G 0.02% 202.1M
Other4.05% 33.39T 3.29% 35.89G
Total100.00% 823.8T 100.00% 1.089T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.38% 11.33T 0.71% 7.757G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.02% 16.67T 2.61% 28.41G
9881.28% 10.53T 0.56% 6.049G
10210.91% 7.471T 0.43% 4.685G
330010.69% 5.710T 0.35% 3.839G
21280.61% 5.042T 0.57% 6.222G