Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090608

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090608 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.32% of octets and 24.47% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 3 10.05M
5 1.485M 11 10.50M
10 1.594M 20 10.95M
50 3.067M 57 17.55M
90 12.67M 59 52.24M
95 21.40M 59 81.91M
99 55.38M 59 190.3M
99.9 347.9M 59 1.039G
99.99 991.0M 60 2.882G
99.999 4.055G 116 7.097G
100 24.90G 116 25.91G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.25% 6.416G
Medium (100-1400B)6.18% 17.63G
Large (1401-1500B)90.68% 258.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.90% 2.566G
Total100.00% 285.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers28.00% 119.7T 29.06% 82.94G 35.44% 4.913M
Encrypted Traffic7.51% 32.12T 8.42% 24.03G 5.81% 806.0k
Measurement3.94% 16.86T 4.06% 11.58G 0.32% 44.95k
Advanced Apps3.76% 16.08T 3.90% 11.12G 4.45% 617.5k
File Sharing2.29% 9.790T 2.32% 6.635G 1.97% 272.9k
Misc0.69% 2.953T 0.85% 2.417G 1.19% 164.6k
Games0.16% 667.1G 0.17% 471.9M 0.21% 29.00k
Audio/Video0.11% 483.7G 0.12% 345.7M 0.24% 33.07k
Unidentified53.54% 228.9T 51.11% 145.9G 50.36% 6.981M
Total100.00% 427.6T 100.00% 285.4G 100.00% 13.86M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.059G900011Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]Iperf
6.702G811022Abilene [11537]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
5.442G900023INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.766G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.505G824415ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.985G900046DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.045G900017Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.041G896210VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.018G150012Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
999.7M150013Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.330G899912Abilene [11537]ESnet-East [291]5011 -> 5011
7.891G821819Abilene [11537]ESnet-West [292]5093 -> 5093
1.105G732510DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Hotline
945.0M150018Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5073 -> 5073
770.2M150022Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]52440 -> 53763
727.7M110110Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 51688
694.5M150013Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]40272 -> 50394
614.8M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5014 -> 5014
544.7M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 45838
510.8M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]58126 -> 5101

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.133k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.04% 349.4T 39.84% 464.8G
Encrypted Traffic7.05% 66.52T 7.88% 91.98G
Advanced Apps2.82% 26.63T 2.50% 29.20G
Misc2.03% 19.19T 4.74% 55.35G
Measurement2.01% 18.95T 1.48% 17.25G
File Sharing1.84% 17.35T 1.70% 19.81G
Audio/Video0.94% 8.853T 0.90% 10.50G
Games0.27% 2.511T 0.44% 5.173G
Unidentified46.00% 434.0T 40.50% 472.4G
Total100.00% 943.5T 100.00% 1.166T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
34.12%
2.00%
0.52%
0.40%
---
321.9T
18.83T
4.892T
3.760T
---
37.34%
1.49%
0.53%
0.48%
---
435.6G
17.39G
6.216G
5.568G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.42%
2.75%
0.87%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.31T
25.94T
8.161T
74.09G
35.78G
---
3.45%
3.50%
0.91%
0.02%
0.01%
---
40.27G
40.85G
10.57G
176.8M
104.5M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
BBFTP
McIDAS
IBP
GsiFTP
---
2.49%
0.23%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
23.46T
2.215T
467.5G
238.6G
207.2G
35.42G
---
2.25%
0.17%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
26.26G
2.031G
382.7M
266.0M
158.2M
102.9M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
NFS
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SNMP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.36%
0.19%
0.19%
0.08%
0.08%
0.06%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.82T
1.833T
1.810T
726.5G
720.1G
522.6G
253.6G
247.9G
70.40G
62.00G
40.61G
30.89G
20.49G
16.67G
11.61G
3.821G
458.9M
---
2.49%
1.19%
0.25%
0.08%
0.08%
0.08%
0.04%
0.36%
0.03%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.03G
13.85G
2.891G
985.4M
926.0M
964.0M
425.8M
4.147G
383.3M
779.2M
325.4M
353.9M
176.5M
49.52M
15.50M
39.67M
3.185M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.97%
0.04%
0.00%
---
18.60T
348.3G
0.000
---
1.24%
0.24%
0.00%
---
14.44G
2.810G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.12%
0.26%
0.24%
0.16%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.54T
2.444T
2.292T
1.509T
393.3G
82.71G
61.18G
12.73G
8.788G
1.926G
1.278G
448.3M
10.81M
---
0.87%
0.34%
0.26%
0.16%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.13G
3.997G
3.068G
1.886G
443.6M
113.0M
121.0M
19.32M
12.34M
5.019M
15.15M
3.309M
56.10k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.64%
0.27%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.036T
2.509T
161.0G
47.05G
45.64G
28.06G
20.87G
4.723G
9.627M
---
0.48%
0.33%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.552G
3.871G
199.0M
300.3M
63.61M
485.2M
27.55M
8.269M
7.100k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.15%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.388T
464.4G
283.9G
254.6G
83.16G
25.36G
11.51G
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.13%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.298G
799.7M
1.524G
269.9M
202.7M
59.45M
19.02M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
46.00%
---
434.0T
---
40.50%
---
472.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
943.5T
---
100.00%
---
1.166T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 348.3G 0.24% 2.810G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.65M 0.00% 1.244M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 95.41G 0.01% 98.16M
TCP[6]90.37% 852.6T 87.50% 1.020T
UDP[17]4.85% 45.72T 8.64% 100.8G
IPv6[41]0.05% 481.4G 0.05% 616.1M
GRE[47]3.81% 35.94T 2.63% 30.68G
ESP[50]0.87% 8.161T 0.91% 10.57G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.293G 0.00% 53.30M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 74.15G 0.02% 177.2M
Total100.00% 943.5T 100.00% 1.166T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.14% 456.5G
Medium (100-1400B)17.84% 208.0G
Large (1401-1500B)41.71% 486.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.32% 15.35G
Total100.00% 1.166T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.35% 909.1T 96.97% 1.131T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.417T 0.06% 701.1M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 44.85G 0.02% 214.3M
Other3.49% 32.96T 2.95% 34.42G
Total100.00% 943.5T 100.00% 1.166T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.83% 7.877T 0.47% 5.426G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
9881.71% 16.12T 0.23% 2.716G
19351.59% 15.03T 2.34% 27.25G
200001.25% 11.79T 1.02% 11.86G
200011.08% 10.23T 0.78% 9.135G
10210.85% 8.055T 0.11% 1.319G