Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090601

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090601 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.33% of octets and 24.47% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 4 10.05M
5 1.483M 12 10.50M
10 1.588M 24 11.01M
50 2.904M 58 17.70M
90 11.90M 59 51.90M
95 19.79M 59 82.95M
99 48.98M 59 180.7M
99.9 343.9M 59 756.8M
99.99 1.001G 59 1.537G
99.999 3.172G 60 6.344G
100 25.44G 62 35.11G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.18% 6.553G
Medium (100-1400B)6.16% 18.51G
Large (1401-1500B)91.43% 274.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.23% 691.6M
Total100.00% 300.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers26.26% 114.4T 26.28% 78.99G 30.00% 4.432M
Encrypted Traffic8.63% 37.61T 9.61% 28.88G 6.25% 923.8k
Advanced Apps4.63% 20.19T 4.62% 13.88G 5.86% 866.0k
Measurement3.72% 16.22T 3.16% 9.488G 0.28% 41.32k
File Sharing2.07% 9.014T 2.06% 6.189G 1.71% 252.6k
Misc0.70% 3.034T 0.81% 2.446G 1.07% 158.6k
Games0.17% 721.3G 0.17% 508.3M 0.20% 29.68k
Audio/Video0.12% 528.8G 0.13% 377.2M 0.24% 35.18k
Unidentified53.71% 234.1T 53.16% 159.7G 54.38% 8.033M
Total100.00% 435.9T 100.00% 300.5G 100.00% 14.77M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.148G900055INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.689G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.298G824420ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.203G900027DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
2.676G888421Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
2.115G900010AMES-NAS [24]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.203G843019Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.045G879910VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
995.9M149210SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
988.7M150014Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
977.1M900023ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Shoutcast
944.3M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5086 -> 5086
726.9M150011Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]35851 -> 20476
608.5M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5064 -> 5064
583.2M149911U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]59863 -> 22213
560.8M150015Unknown [32440]TACCNET [32093]59966 -> 50391
489.1M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]55556 -> 5101
482.6M150016Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
445.6M150060Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
428.8M150040Unknown [32440]NCSA [1224]39926 -> 50386

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.253k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers35.95% 338.3T 38.55% 473.5G
Encrypted Traffic7.65% 71.97T 8.05% 98.94G
Advanced Apps3.89% 36.56T 2.98% 36.54G
Misc2.17% 20.45T 4.75% 58.37G
Measurement1.91% 17.94T 1.34% 16.41G
File Sharing1.74% 16.39T 1.61% 19.76G
Audio/Video0.80% 7.546T 0.72% 8.871G
Games0.32% 2.966T 0.51% 6.261G
Unidentified45.57% 428.8T 41.48% 509.5G
Total100.00% 941.1T 100.00% 1.228T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
32.22%
2.93%
0.40%
0.40%
---
303.2T
27.59T
3.789T
3.736T
---
35.77%
1.83%
0.49%
0.46%
---
439.3G
22.45G
6.066G
5.699G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.03%
2.83%
0.77%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.94T
26.66T
7.252T
82.11G
35.44G
---
3.78%
3.47%
0.78%
0.02%
0.01%
---
46.48G
42.57G
9.585G
187.6M
107.0M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
BBCP
BBFTP
McIDAS
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.91%
0.84%
0.08%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.37T
7.922T
748.5G
486.7G
33.89G
1.601G
---
2.41%
0.47%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.63G
5.768G
608.4M
440.9M
84.44M
12.86M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.43%
0.21%
0.19%
0.12%
0.08%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.45T
1.994T
1.813T
1.122T
739.2G
701.1G
239.8G
130.3G
64.96G
60.79G
49.17G
25.74G
23.05G
19.11G
8.462G
5.997G
647.6M
---
2.46%
1.24%
0.23%
0.11%
0.08%
0.10%
0.35%
0.01%
0.07%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
30.27G
15.21G
2.820G
1.392G
934.3M
1.177G
4.260G
182.5M
852.4M
329.4M
398.7M
263.1M
50.78M
160.1M
19.42M
43.95M
5.273M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.86%
0.05%
0.00%
---
17.46T
471.8G
2.814M
---
0.97%
0.37%
0.00%
---
11.89G
4.524G
1.900k
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Carracho
WinMX
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.00%
0.31%
0.22%
0.13%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.408T
2.922T
2.087T
1.261T
541.8G
80.26G
67.37G
11.78G
7.152G
2.738G
2.165G
167.4M
13.69M
---
0.78%
0.38%
0.25%
0.13%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.519G
4.641G
3.131G
1.606G
558.4M
148.1M
99.76M
17.67M
11.99M
4.136M
26.85M
1.367M
159.9k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.47%
0.30%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.420T
2.805T
187.6G
48.75G
46.64G
23.71G
9.566G
4.353G
30.78M
---
0.34%
0.35%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.131G
4.337G
224.9M
62.88M
60.39M
28.28M
15.22M
11.09M
22.70k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.16%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.537T
509.3G
448.9G
325.5G
105.3G
24.80G
14.63G
---
0.19%
0.20%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.294G
2.441G
846.4M
347.7M
246.5M
59.79M
24.97M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
45.57%
---
428.8T
---
41.48%
---
509.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
941.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.228T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 471.8G 0.37% 4.524G
IGMP[2]0.00% 294.9M 0.00% 4.210M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 54.79G 0.01% 63.98M
TCP[6]91.00% 856.4T 86.12% 1.057T
UDP[17]4.99% 46.95T 10.69% 131.2G
IPv6[41]0.05% 452.9G 0.05% 604.4M
GRE[47]3.12% 29.39T 1.97% 24.18G
ESP[50]0.77% 7.252T 0.78% 9.585G
AX.25[93]0.00% 2.670M 0.00% 1.900k
PIM[103]0.00% 4.538G 0.00% 56.31M
IPMP[169]0.00% 2.814M 0.00% 1.900k
Other0.01% 82.76G 0.02% 188.4M
Total100.00% 941.1T 100.00% 1.228T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.07% 504.4G
Medium (100-1400B)17.88% 219.6G
Large (1401-1500B)40.38% 495.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.67% 8.243G
Total100.00% 1.228T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.78% 901.3T 96.69% 1.187T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 1.209T 0.10% 1.198G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 47.69G 0.02% 223.7M
Other4.09% 38.47T 3.19% 39.23G
Total100.00% 941.1T 100.00% 1.228T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.50% 4.742T 0.27% 3.283G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.16% 20.28T 2.41% 29.58G
200002.03% 19.15T 1.55% 19.04G
200011.69% 15.87T 1.11% 13.64G
200021.27% 11.96T 0.79% 9.751G
200031.06% 9.999T 0.64% 7.884G