Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090511

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090511 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.38% of octets and 18.47% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 3 10.05M
5 1.485M 10 10.50M
10 1.595M 18 10.95M
50 3.153M 58 17.70M
90 12.93M 59 51.76M
95 21.46M 59 84.60M
99 63.80M 59 229.0M
99.9 569.4M 59 924.9M
99.99 1.015G 59 2.388G
99.999 3.948G 60 6.496G
100 96.54G 61 25.00G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.44% 7.924G
Medium (100-1400B)12.03% 27.69G
Large (1401-1500B)84.23% 193.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.30% 679.7M
Total100.00% 230.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.76% 115.2T 34.73% 79.95G 46.20% 4.764M
Encrypted Traffic10.26% 33.05T 12.63% 29.06G 7.98% 822.5k
Measurement5.86% 18.87T 5.10% 11.73G 0.41% 42.39k
Advanced Apps5.09% 16.40T 4.96% 11.42G 6.31% 650.8k
File Sharing1.85% 5.946T 1.78% 4.093G 1.50% 154.3k
Misc0.94% 3.018T 0.98% 2.250G 1.64% 169.0k
Audio/Video0.25% 794.5G 0.25% 568.3M 0.52% 53.30k
Games0.23% 747.0G 0.23% 529.2M 0.32% 32.99k
Unidentified39.78% 128.1T 39.35% 90.59G 35.12% 3.621M
Total100.00% 322.3T 100.00% 230.2G 100.00% 10.31M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.624G824420ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
4.344G824416ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.967G900017Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.625G846433INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]AMES-NAS [24]Iperf
2.323G900060AMES-NAS [24]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.074G900015NASA-AERONET [10343]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.063G895010VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.038G900021ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.008G149911Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
986.3M150010U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.606G900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]33507 -> 3002
994.3M900052INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]NCSA [1224]45943 -> 5150
978.8M900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]33058 -> 3002
874.6M900010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]3003 -> 32909
855.1M149819Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]21222 -> 42859
848.7M900050SDSC [195]ORNL [50]58876 -> 5150
756.9M150010Abilene [11537]UMDNET [27]3003 -> 51365
655.3M150023Unknown [12816]Boston U [111]60789 -> 45480
652.9M900046SDSC [195]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Audiogalaxy
596.7M150031Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 841.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers41.63% 358.9T 43.52% 542.4G
Encrypted Traffic7.90% 68.09T 8.26% 102.9G
Advanced Apps3.02% 26.07T 2.31% 28.80G
Measurement2.41% 20.73T 1.47% 18.34G
Misc2.36% 20.35T 4.86% 60.55G
File Sharing1.73% 14.94T 1.63% 20.35G
Audio/Video1.10% 9.522T 0.88% 10.92G
Games0.38% 3.299T 0.59% 7.365G
Unidentified39.46% 340.2T 36.48% 454.6G
Total100.00% 862.1T 100.00% 1.246T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.51%
2.19%
0.47%
0.46%
---
332.0T
18.87T
4.014T
4.006T
---
41.18%
1.33%
0.46%
0.56%
---
513.2G
16.52G
5.726G
6.919G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.73%
3.65%
0.50%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.15T
31.50T
4.317T
79.30G
30.60G
---
3.76%
3.94%
0.54%
0.01%
0.01%
---
46.87G
49.16G
6.672G
185.9M
93.32M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.95%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.39T
505.1G
122.4G
35.77G
18.57G
1.205G
---
2.24%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.95G
451.9M
218.3M
79.58M
95.69M
5.924M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.36%
0.05%
0.00%
---
20.33T
401.5G
0.000
---
1.18%
0.30%
0.00%
---
14.64G
3.699G
0.000
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
IDENT
SOCKS
Telnet
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.64%
0.23%
0.21%
0.08%
0.07%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.12T
2.018T
1.840T
651.8G
583.7G
405.9G
222.4G
159.9G
67.84G
67.76G
67.55G
36.00G
35.45G
32.98G
19.37G
14.96G
823.7M
---
2.35%
1.44%
0.24%
0.08%
0.12%
0.08%
0.32%
0.02%
0.07%
0.03%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.26G
17.93G
2.930G
1.049G
1.540G
1.048G
3.985G
188.5M
891.0M
325.2M
681.3M
73.66M
73.47M
376.3M
153.0M
26.05M
8.848M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.77%
0.36%
0.33%
0.14%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.658T
3.130T
2.887T
1.194T
729.3G
134.9G
117.2G
53.24G
22.18G
9.412G
3.003G
167.2M
40.00M
---
0.60%
0.44%
0.36%
0.12%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.497G
5.474G
4.506G
1.514G
791.4M
261.0M
162.7M
58.99M
32.73M
15.96M
35.95M
725.7k
73.30k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.57%
0.49%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.929T
4.186T
239.4G
65.03G
59.67G
20.82G
16.08G
5.678G
55.86M
---
0.38%
0.45%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.795G
5.607G
283.9M
86.79M
76.48M
36.84M
22.37M
11.76M
41.20k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.22%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
1.870T
521.1G
414.2G
224.0G
181.1G
58.82G
29.20G
---
0.23%
0.10%
0.20%
0.02%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.823G
1.241G
2.527G
233.7M
395.8M
83.47M
60.27M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.46%
---
340.2T
---
36.48%
---
454.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
862.1T
---
100.00%
---
1.246T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 401.5G 0.30% 3.699G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.44M 0.00% 1.240M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 78.08G 0.01% 113.4M
TCP[6]89.39% 770.7T 85.97% 1.071T
UDP[17]7.10% 61.24T 11.11% 138.4G
IPv6[41]0.08% 707.4G 0.07% 907.2M
GRE[47]2.85% 24.60T 1.98% 24.67G
ESP[50]0.50% 4.317T 0.54% 6.672G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.279G 0.00% 51.31M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 85.75G 0.02% 260.8M
Total100.00% 862.1T 100.00% 1.246T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.63% 543.8G
Medium (100-1400B)22.51% 280.6G
Large (1401-1500B)33.26% 414.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.59% 7.354G
Total100.00% 1.246T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.32% 821.8T 95.57% 1.191T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.23% 1.953T 0.23% 2.876G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 74.66G 0.02% 225.4M
Other4.44% 38.32T 4.18% 52.05G
Total100.00% 862.1T 100.00% 1.246T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.79% 6.773T 0.37% 4.671G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.87% 24.76T 3.10% 38.58G
45000.60% 5.130T 0.54% 6.751G
514130.54% 4.666T 0.35% 4.399G
21280.39% 3.378T 0.35% 4.403G
90010.35% 3.027T 0.32% 3.975G