Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090504

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090504 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.64% of octets and 18.25% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 3 10.05M
5 1.485M 11 10.50M
10 1.591M 19 10.95M
50 3.131M 58 17.70M
90 13.23M 59 53.10M
95 20.63M 59 89.40M
99 59.30M 59 210.6M
99.9 583.3M 59 930.9M
99.99 1.012G 59 3.361G
99.999 2.531G 59 6.158G
100 98.57G 62 14.71G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)4.30% 11.55G
Medium (100-1400B)12.59% 33.82G
Large (1401-1500B)82.88% 222.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.23% 608.5M
Total100.00% 268.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.97% 133.5T 34.41% 92.43G 46.51% 5.511M
Encrypted Traffic12.46% 46.25T 14.45% 38.80G 8.39% 993.9k
Measurement7.98% 29.62T 8.12% 21.80G 0.85% 100.4k
Advanced Apps5.31% 19.70T 5.40% 14.50G 5.64% 668.3k
File Sharing1.61% 5.979T 1.61% 4.311G 1.48% 174.9k
Misc0.83% 3.100T 0.81% 2.185G 1.45% 171.7k
Games0.24% 897.3G 0.23% 627.3M 0.33% 38.70k
Audio/Video0.23% 860.0G 0.23% 611.8M 0.51% 60.61k
Unidentified35.37% 131.3T 34.74% 93.33G 34.86% 4.130M
Total100.00% 371.3T 100.00% 268.6G 100.00% 11.85M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.590G824414ESnet-East [291]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.177G824417ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.969G900060NASA-AERONET [10343]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.236G900010AMES-NAS [24]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.061G895810VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.011G900055INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
996.1M149811Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]VANDERBILT [7212]Iperf
987.5M150014U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
986.3M150010Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
985.1M150014Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
965.6M150015Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5024 -> 5024
903.7M900010Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]3003 -> 44299
896.9M900048Argonne [683]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]56219 -> 5150
773.3M150044Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
720.4M150028Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]58763 -> 48828
701.9M150015Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5072 -> 5072
677.6M900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]36045 -> 3002
521.7M898810High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]39641 -> 5101
507.4M150036UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]55275 -> 21752
482.7M900052INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]AMES-NAS [24]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 972.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.84% 444.3T 45.08% 663.4G
Encrypted Traffic8.54% 86.59T 8.43% 124.0G
Measurement3.15% 31.94T 1.96% 28.87G
Advanced Apps2.84% 28.75T 2.18% 32.05G
Misc2.12% 21.45T 4.22% 62.16G
File Sharing1.56% 15.85T 1.53% 22.57G
Audio/Video0.86% 8.687T 0.70% 10.33G
Games0.49% 4.973T 0.73% 10.70G
Unidentified36.59% 370.8T 35.16% 517.5G
Total100.00% 1.013P 100.00% 1.471T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
40.88%
2.18%
0.42%
0.36%
---
414.2T
22.13T
4.250T
3.660T
---
42.85%
1.37%
0.50%
0.36%
---
630.5G
20.17G
7.370G
5.332G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.47%
3.38%
0.68%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.33T
34.20T
6.919T
100.4G
29.44G
---
4.07%
3.68%
0.66%
0.01%
0.01%
---
59.85G
54.17G
9.719G
219.3M
90.28M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.12%
0.04%
0.00%
---
31.57T
369.7G
0.000
---
1.75%
0.21%
0.00%
---
25.71G
3.156G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
2.31%
0.44%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.40T
4.450T
511.9G
303.1G
58.10G
30.44G
---
1.82%
0.29%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.75G
4.305G
463.3M
308.8M
154.4M
73.56M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
IDENT
RTIP
Telnet
NFS
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.47%
0.21%
0.17%
0.11%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.90T
2.168T
1.752T
1.098T
578.4G
275.0G
212.9G
75.41G
69.52G
58.50G
55.79G
51.92G
51.60G
41.20G
31.60G
18.55G
737.7M
---
2.04%
1.34%
0.19%
0.11%
0.06%
0.05%
0.24%
0.02%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.07G
19.65G
2.841G
1.679G
933.4M
745.6M
3.603G
336.2M
911.8M
88.45M
468.9M
450.8M
91.68M
62.20M
55.89M
152.2M
6.713M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.69%
0.33%
0.32%
0.12%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.950T
3.332T
3.287T
1.185T
727.1G
186.9G
108.9G
30.23G
26.65G
11.42G
5.519G
790.5M
471.7M
---
0.55%
0.42%
0.36%
0.10%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.087G
6.251G
5.241G
1.500G
822.8M
366.0M
146.9M
34.78M
40.07M
17.15M
69.34M
1.073M
394.8k
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.43%
0.39%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.330T
3.965T
204.4G
70.51G
68.63G
21.94G
17.96G
7.557G
642.0M
---
0.40%
0.27%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.861G
3.969G
245.2M
87.57M
91.01M
39.31M
26.88M
17.79M
473.6k
Games
DirectX
Asheron
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.20%
0.09%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
---
2.046T
954.4G
822.0G
559.1G
364.7G
199.7G
27.00G
---
0.23%
0.05%
0.13%
0.25%
0.03%
0.04%
0.00%
---
3.334G
700.8M
1.943G
3.740G
379.3M
538.8M
72.32M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
36.59%
---
370.8T
---
35.16%
---
517.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.013P
---
100.00%
---
1.471T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 369.7G 0.21% 3.156G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.26M 0.00% 1.212M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 47.71G 0.01% 75.37M
TCP[6]89.10% 903.0T 85.65% 1.260T
UDP[17]8.03% 81.38T 11.99% 176.5G
IPv6[41]0.11% 1.150T 0.10% 1.453G
GRE[47]2.02% 20.44T 1.35% 19.85G
ESP[50]0.68% 6.919T 0.66% 9.719G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 4.160G 0.00% 49.22M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 118.1G 0.03% 424.0M
Total100.00% 1.013P 100.00% 1.471T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.61% 641.8G
Medium (100-1400B)22.60% 332.6G
Large (1401-1500B)33.48% 492.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.31% 4.539G
Total100.00% 1.471T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.73% 970.2T 96.27% 1.416T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.40% 4.086T 0.30% 4.422G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 47.99G 0.01% 202.6M
Other3.86% 39.10T 3.42% 50.30G
Total100.00% 1.013P 100.00% 1.471T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.04% 10.57T 0.49% 7.180G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.82% 18.40T 2.56% 37.69G
330010.82% 8.355T 0.38% 5.605G
164020.65% 6.616T 0.57% 8.324G
45000.52% 5.232T 0.47% 6.853G
514130.46% 4.706T 0.32% 4.724G