Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090406

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090406 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 38.93% of octets and 20.15% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 2 10.05M
5 1.483M 8 10.47M
10 1.585M 16 10.95M
50 3.069M 57 17.00M
90 14.42M 59 50.11M
95 27.81M 59 78.81M
99 81.93M 59 227.1M
99.9 457.3M 59 795.6M
99.99 967.7M 59 2.050G
99.999 1.812G 60 5.792G
100 27.30G 63 47.63G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)3.11% 10.41G
Medium (100-1400B)10.53% 35.24G
Large (1401-1500B)86.32% 288.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.03% 113.0M
Total100.00% 334.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.91% 144.8T 30.07% 100.6G 39.39% 6.129M
Encrypted Traffic7.64% 35.79T 8.88% 29.72G 6.24% 970.7k
Measurement5.49% 25.69T 6.26% 20.94G 0.45% 70.40k
Advanced Apps3.77% 17.64T 3.70% 12.39G 5.10% 793.0k
File Sharing2.70% 12.65T 2.59% 8.681G 1.94% 301.3k
Misc0.68% 3.185T 0.67% 2.243G 1.15% 178.2k
Games0.31% 1.458T 0.31% 1.033G 0.39% 60.21k
Audio/Video0.22% 1.032T 0.23% 757.7M 0.45% 70.45k
Unidentified48.29% 226.2T 47.29% 158.2G 44.90% 6.987M
Total100.00% 468.4T 100.00% 334.6G 100.00% 15.56M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
8.439G900035Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.005G150017APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
999.2M149810VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
991.4M149010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
989.4M132410Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
983.8M150012U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
974.6M150020Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
961.2M150012Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
954.6M148910U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]Iperf
947.3M150013Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.193G900010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]47938 -> 4900
1.072G900012Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
960.5M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5010 -> 5010
944.9M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]BBCP
764.0M150059Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Shoutcast
637.2M899010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50056 -> 5101
623.0M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-West [292]5023 -> 5023
609.0M150020INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
587.5M150015Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]UNL [7896]42558 -> 40204
568.7M150030BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Merit [237]5018 -> 5018

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.245k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.56% 512.1T 43.30% 718.8G
Encrypted Traffic6.13% 73.73T 6.87% 114.1G
Advanced Apps2.31% 27.75T 1.80% 29.94G
Measurement2.28% 27.45T 1.65% 27.46G
File Sharing1.97% 23.75T 1.73% 28.66G
Misc1.86% 22.40T 4.33% 71.88G
Audio/Video0.91% 10.96T 0.75% 12.49G
Games0.44% 5.299T 0.73% 12.03G
Unidentified41.53% 499.7T 38.84% 644.8G
Total100.00% 1.203P 100.00% 1.660T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
39.78%
1.79%
0.62%
0.37%
---
478.6T
21.56T
7.444T
4.454T
---
41.15%
1.13%
0.55%
0.47%
---
683.2G
18.73G
9.093G
7.791G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.99%
2.71%
0.42%
0.01%
0.00%
---
35.98T
32.63T
5.001T
84.41G
29.14G
---
3.22%
3.17%
0.46%
0.01%
0.01%
---
53.46G
52.66G
7.706G
210.1M
92.11M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.09%
0.12%
0.05%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.12T
1.454T
592.9G
518.4G
37.54G
26.19G
---
1.65%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
---
27.32G
1.214G
630.1M
558.0M
82.34M
136.2M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.25%
0.03%
0.00%
---
27.10T
356.3G
51.20k
---
1.48%
0.18%
0.00%
---
24.51G
2.957G
100.0
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.96%
0.35%
0.33%
0.24%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.54T
4.211T
3.912T
2.894T
765.5G
225.9G
111.8G
43.15G
29.81G
10.32G
8.217G
3.341G
59.65M
---
0.71%
0.23%
0.36%
0.31%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.85G
3.878G
5.981G
5.220G
885.6M
479.9M
156.0M
45.69M
43.09M
13.94M
99.86M
3.564M
111.1k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
NFS
Telnet
RTIP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.24%
0.22%
0.14%
0.08%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.92T
2.602T
1.738T
1.012T
751.4G
573.9G
252.1G
111.9G
88.75G
78.08G
74.02G
66.62G
58.16G
25.27G
22.04G
21.02G
638.2M
---
1.78%
1.71%
0.18%
0.08%
0.09%
0.06%
0.22%
0.03%
0.07%
0.01%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.50G
28.38G
2.969G
1.390G
1.457G
1.062G
3.659G
427.9M
1.149G
118.8M
832.7M
531.2M
129.0M
35.72M
58.19M
170.6M
7.953M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.43%
0.43%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.233T
5.190T
314.7G
92.01G
87.97G
24.11G
15.21G
7.675G
161.7M
---
0.29%
0.42%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.870G
6.931G
381.3M
120.0M
112.2M
36.72M
23.73M
18.11M
119.3k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.22%
0.08%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.599T
1.000T
724.9G
628.7G
212.8G
72.44G
59.82G
---
0.25%
0.13%
0.05%
0.25%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
---
4.103G
2.210G
767.6M
4.126G
598.9M
115.7M
114.3M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.53%
---
499.7T
---
38.84%
---
644.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.203P
---
100.00%
---
1.660T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 356.3G 0.18% 2.957G
IGMP[2]0.00% 59.30M 0.00% 1.329M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 181.0G 0.01% 173.0M
TCP[6]91.12% 1.096P 86.33% 1.433T
UDP[17]7.14% 85.93T 12.09% 200.6G
IPv6[41]0.05% 642.7G 0.06% 917.7M
GRE[47]1.22% 14.67T 0.86% 14.28G
ESP[50]0.42% 5.001T 0.46% 7.706G
AX.25[93]0.00% 204.8k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.560G 0.00% 53.81M
IPMP[169]0.00% 51.20k 0.00% 100.0
Other0.01% 84.57G 0.01% 210.7M
Total100.00% 1.203P 100.00% 1.660T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.50% 689.0G
Medium (100-1400B)21.65% 359.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.77% 610.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 1.312G
Total100.00% 1.660T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.95% 1.166P 96.95% 1.609T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.18% 2.156T 0.19% 3.155G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 44.37G 0.01% 175.6M
Other2.87% 34.55T 2.85% 47.26G
Total100.00% 1.203P 100.00% 1.660T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.58% 6.938T 0.29% 4.796G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.28% 27.47T 3.20% 53.14G
330011.90% 22.88T 0.93% 15.36G
164020.81% 9.744T 0.74% 12.27G
200000.56% 6.709T 0.42% 6.958G
514130.47% 5.712T 0.35% 5.850G