Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090330

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090330 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.06% of octets and 20.78% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.398M 2 10.05M
5 1.495M 7 10.50M
10 1.612M 15 10.95M
50 3.333M 57 17.85M
90 14.98M 59 52.80M
95 27.85M 59 81.90M
99 83.23M 59 217.6M
99.9 411.6M 59 808.3M
99.99 946.6M 59 1.871G
99.999 1.494G 60 5.038G
100 14.57G 66 46.16G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.46% 8.842G
Medium (100-1400B)11.99% 43.15G
Large (1401-1500B)85.52% 307.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.03% 124.5M
Total100.00% 360.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.59% 149.0T 28.87% 103.9G 39.18% 6.352M
Encrypted Traffic8.57% 43.15T 10.10% 36.38G 6.48% 1.050M
Measurement5.46% 27.49T 6.26% 22.52G 0.76% 123.1k
Advanced Apps4.31% 21.72T 4.49% 16.16G 4.99% 809.2k
File Sharing3.06% 15.40T 2.92% 10.49G 2.40% 388.8k
Misc0.64% 3.208T 0.67% 2.406G 1.13% 183.2k
Games0.29% 1.441T 0.28% 1.012G 0.37% 60.43k
Audio/Video0.19% 966.0G 0.19% 692.2M 0.42% 68.23k
Unidentified47.89% 241.1T 46.22% 166.4G 44.27% 7.178M
Total100.00% 503.6T 100.00% 360.0G 100.00% 16.21M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.709G900021Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.303G150010U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.005G150010U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
1.001G150014APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
990.7M149910VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
989.7M150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
988.7M150015Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
986.8M130510Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
977.4M149310SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
961.0M150013Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.466G900021U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]HTTPS
1.525G900011SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Audiogalaxy
992.6M900041Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5012 -> 5012
986.5M150014Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]5010 -> 5010
949.1M150010Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]32969 -> 3002
946.9M149910VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]5019 -> 5019
772.2M150020Unknown [25776]ESnet-East [291]5011 -> 5011
712.7M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]55104 -> 5101
704.2M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
666.1M150039Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.286k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.86% 552.6T 44.04% 763.2G
Encrypted Traffic6.59% 84.92T 6.93% 120.0G
Advanced Apps2.49% 32.11T 1.97% 34.15G
Measurement2.39% 30.80T 1.72% 29.79G
File Sharing2.06% 26.57T 1.77% 30.63G
Misc1.68% 21.61T 3.37% 58.34G
Audio/Video0.84% 10.87T 0.71% 12.37G
Games0.41% 5.289T 0.70% 12.06G
Unidentified40.68% 524.5T 38.80% 672.4G
Total100.00% 1.289P 100.00% 1.733T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.59%
1.39%
0.52%
0.35%
---
523.3T
17.98T
6.757T
4.537T
---
42.18%
0.93%
0.47%
0.45%
---
731.0G
16.18G
8.118G
7.855G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec IKE
IPsec AH
---
3.35%
2.57%
0.66%
0.00%
0.00%
---
43.17T
33.18T
8.520T
28.12G
8.948G
---
3.13%
3.13%
0.66%
0.01%
0.00%
---
54.31G
54.24G
11.36G
89.73M
20.61M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
1.90%
0.41%
0.11%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.50T
5.288T
1.432T
767.4G
86.86G
41.18G
---
1.55%
0.30%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.83G
5.175G
1.199G
715.9M
152.8M
80.14M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.35%
0.04%
0.00%
---
30.33T
543.3G
0.000
---
1.54%
0.21%
0.00%
---
26.72G
3.585G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.10%
0.33%
0.32%
0.21%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.17T
4.255T
4.109T
2.717T
869.1G
252.6G
113.9G
31.95G
30.48G
9.380G
8.579G
777.1M
128.0M
---
0.80%
0.35%
0.22%
0.28%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.93G
6.078G
3.819G
4.903G
959.6M
575.6M
156.8M
33.14M
44.65M
13.78M
106.6M
2.573M
206.2k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
NTP
IRC
Telnet
RTIP
NFS
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.16%
0.15%
0.14%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.96T
1.957T
1.866T
1.005T
543.5G
514.8G
226.6G
113.9G
80.50G
64.93G
64.75G
61.74G
57.82G
42.21G
27.72G
20.19G
1.521G
---
1.68%
0.89%
0.18%
0.08%
0.07%
0.06%
0.20%
0.09%
0.02%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.04G
15.46G
3.179G
1.348G
1.284G
974.1M
3.505G
1.491G
343.4M
654.0M
524.2M
103.7M
118.5M
58.38M
173.7M
54.94M
13.20M
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.41%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.329T
5.095T
243.8G
93.33G
70.31G
25.20G
14.72G
6.486G
69.30k
---
0.41%
0.27%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.158G
4.594G
327.9M
119.7M
95.50M
40.50M
23.13M
17.57M
1.050k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.19%
0.08%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
2.488T
1.072T
735.1G
645.2G
197.6G
83.03G
67.28G
---
0.23%
0.13%
0.04%
0.25%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.916G
2.286G
758.5M
4.298G
554.2M
131.2M
116.0M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.68%
---
524.5T
---
38.80%
---
672.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.289P
---
100.00%
---
1.733T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 543.3G 0.21% 3.585G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.17M 0.00% 1.292M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 161.2G 0.01% 144.0M
TCP[6]90.25% 1.163P 86.34% 1.496T
UDP[17]7.56% 97.47T 11.82% 204.8G
IPv6[41]0.05% 673.1G 0.06% 1.018G
GRE[47]1.43% 18.37T 0.94% 16.22G
ESP[50]0.66% 8.520T 0.66% 11.36G
AX.25[93]0.00% 30.80k 0.00% 466.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.677G 0.00% 49.97M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.00% 8.999G 0.00% 21.06M
Total100.00% 1.289P 100.00% 1.733T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.94% 692.2G
Medium (100-1400B)22.25% 385.6G
Large (1401-1500B)37.72% 653.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 1.417G
Total100.00% 1.733T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.12% 1.252P 96.94% 1.680T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.983T 0.18% 3.078G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 40.26G 0.01% 195.9M
Other2.72% 35.13T 2.87% 49.74G
Total100.00% 1.289P 100.00% 1.733T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.43% 5.527T 0.22% 3.878G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330012.23% 28.72T 1.11% 19.26G
19351.50% 19.38T 2.27% 39.33G
164020.78% 10.08T 0.72% 12.55G
200000.51% 6.618T 0.41% 7.091G
30740.38% 4.851T 1.36% 23.55G