Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090323

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090323 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.70% of octets and 19.96% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 1 10.05M
5 1.492M 7 10.50M
10 1.607M 14 10.95M
50 3.369M 57 17.70M
90 15.18M 59 52.65M
95 27.23M 59 77.40M
99 83.64M 59 169.8M
99.9 505.5M 59 710.5M
99.99 961.4M 59 1.399G
99.999 1.412G 60 5.022G
100 16.20G 62 47.23G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)2.01% 6.587G
Medium (100-1400B)10.01% 32.75G
Large (1401-1500B)87.95% 287.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.03% 103.3M
Total100.00% 327.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.66% 147.8T 31.34% 102.6G 40.19% 6.421M
Encrypted Traffic10.98% 51.25T 11.38% 37.25G 7.36% 1.175M
Measurement5.05% 23.58T 5.62% 18.40G 0.49% 78.08k
Advanced Apps3.94% 18.40T 3.93% 12.85G 5.05% 807.5k
File Sharing2.64% 12.32T 2.63% 8.622G 2.16% 344.7k
Misc0.72% 3.345T 0.74% 2.426G 1.20% 192.3k
Games0.24% 1.105T 0.24% 774.2M 0.31% 49.11k
Audio/Video0.20% 944.0G 0.21% 692.4M 0.40% 64.39k
Unidentified44.58% 208.1T 43.91% 143.7G 42.84% 6.843M
Total100.00% 466.9T 100.00% 327.4G 100.00% 15.97M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.773G900021Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.532G150010Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.280G149910U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.018G150014APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
985.5M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
983.3M150015U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
980.2M150010VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]Iperf
978.9M150010Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
969.5M150021U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]Iperf
902.1M150010UCSB [131]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.003G898724Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
968.0M150010Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]38853 -> 3002
940.7M145110VANDERBILT [7212]Abilene [11537]50557 -> 3002
919.1M150013Purdue [17]TACCNET [32093]37412 -> 50388
909.9M150010SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]46300 -> 3002
893.7M148810U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]5015 -> 5015
859.5M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]35205 -> 3002
770.1M150010Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Abilene [11537]34059 -> 3002
708.0M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
707.1M150010Unknown [25776]Brookhaven National Lab [43]57214 -> 20000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.255k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.78% 554.5T 45.13% 740.4G
Encrypted Traffic7.23% 89.56T 7.38% 121.1G
Advanced Apps2.32% 28.69T 1.87% 30.67G
Measurement2.09% 25.89T 1.55% 25.39G
File Sharing1.88% 23.23T 1.72% 28.26G
Misc1.77% 21.88T 3.52% 57.67G
Audio/Video0.90% 11.14T 0.78% 12.82G
Games0.38% 4.736T 0.67% 10.98G
Unidentified38.65% 478.6T 37.38% 613.2G
Total100.00% 1.238P 100.00% 1.640T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
42.39%
1.40%
0.62%
0.36%
---
524.9T
17.39T
7.725T
4.501T
---
43.09%
0.94%
0.65%
0.45%
---
707.0G
15.44G
10.66G
7.349G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.22%
2.56%
0.44%
0.01%
0.00%
---
52.20T
31.74T
5.486T
97.10G
25.95G
---
3.66%
3.19%
0.52%
0.01%
0.00%
---
60.06G
52.26G
8.473G
232.2M
81.24M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
IBP
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
2.09%
0.12%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.92T
1.435T
694.6G
479.6G
120.7G
32.94G
---
1.71%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.09G
1.210G
659.1M
489.7M
146.5M
70.01M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.05%
0.05%
0.00%
---
25.33T
561.4G
0.000
---
1.36%
0.18%
0.00%
---
22.38G
3.014G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.30%
0.28%
0.23%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.81T
3.744T
3.490T
2.906T
881.1G
213.6G
118.4G
32.29G
14.69G
7.334G
5.236G
1.340G
8.120M
---
0.73%
0.37%
0.20%
0.31%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.98G
6.020G
3.314G
5.122G
1.012G
482.5M
158.7M
49.87M
21.96M
89.28M
5.740M
1.812M
96.30k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
Telnet
NTP
IRC
NFS
RTIP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.22%
0.16%
0.16%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.08T
2.026T
1.989T
857.3G
679.9G
500.1G
190.6G
133.2G
93.37G
87.38G
68.51G
57.51G
47.03G
33.11G
17.85G
11.85G
998.0M
---
1.74%
0.21%
0.97%
0.08%
0.09%
0.06%
0.18%
0.03%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.48G
3.513G
15.86G
1.286G
1.506G
944.8M
3.023G
472.5M
1.226G
359.2M
108.4M
505.7M
124.8M
45.24M
148.9M
50.66M
4.564M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.45%
0.41%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.511T
5.108T
311.6G
98.00G
68.97G
27.05G
11.16G
6.762G
11.39M
---
0.31%
0.44%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.015G
7.137G
375.1M
121.2M
100.2M
41.05M
19.59M
14.73M
8.400k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.20%
0.07%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.493T
884.8G
630.8G
378.9G
243.0G
56.29G
48.17G
---
0.24%
0.12%
0.24%
0.03%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.863G
1.982G
3.942G
411.6M
604.8M
86.29M
88.31M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.65%
---
478.6T
---
37.38%
---
613.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.238P
---
100.00%
---
1.640T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 561.4G 0.18% 3.014G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.98M 0.00% 1.288M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 138.4G 0.01% 132.0M
TCP[6]90.92% 1.125P 87.03% 1.427T
UDP[17]7.13% 88.34T 11.19% 183.5G
IPv6[41]0.05% 664.6G 0.06% 934.7M
GRE[47]1.39% 17.18T 1.00% 16.44G
ESP[50]0.44% 5.486T 0.52% 8.473G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.334G 0.00% 49.06M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 99.85G 0.02% 264.1M
Total100.00% 1.238P 100.00% 1.640T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.54% 648.6G
Medium (100-1400B)21.59% 354.2G
Large (1401-1500B)38.73% 635.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 2.296G
Total100.00% 1.640T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.77% 1.198P 97.08% 1.592T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.16% 2.025T 0.18% 2.876G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 100.5G 0.02% 257.0M
Other3.06% 37.87T 2.73% 44.78G
Total100.00% 1.238P 100.00% 1.640T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.41% 5.106T 0.22% 3.584G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330012.63% 32.60T 1.33% 21.87G
19352.05% 25.38T 2.69% 44.19G
200000.87% 10.75T 0.71% 11.67G
164020.72% 8.901T 0.68% 11.16G
30740.48% 5.926T 1.54% 25.19G