Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090223

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090223 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.22% of octets and 18.11% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.05M
5 1.489M 9 10.50M
10 1.600M 17 10.95M
50 3.272M 57 17.85M
90 12.79M 59 53.53M
95 22.20M 59 76.65M
99 72.55M 59 165.6M
99.9 182.5M 59 474.4M
99.99 434.8M 113 1.095G
99.999 947.9M 119 2.773G
100 6.800G 123 16.57G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.03% 3.069G
Medium (100-1400B)10.24% 30.52G
Large (1401-1500B)88.71% 264.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.02% 59.75M
Total100.00% 298.2G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.93% 149.7T 35.08% 104.6G 41.10% 6.193M
Encrypted Traffic10.78% 46.24T 11.12% 33.14G 8.26% 1.245M
Advanced Apps2.96% 12.71T 2.95% 8.810G 4.00% 602.6k
File Sharing2.87% 12.32T 2.83% 8.430G 2.20% 332.2k
Measurement0.98% 4.184T 1.05% 3.118G 0.20% 30.21k
Misc0.63% 2.705T 0.71% 2.131G 1.01% 151.8k
Games0.30% 1.276T 0.30% 892.9M 0.32% 48.64k
Audio/Video0.19% 828.1G 0.20% 601.4M 0.39% 58.52k
Unidentified46.35% 198.8T 45.76% 136.4G 42.52% 6.407M
Total100.00% 428.8T 100.00% 298.2G 100.00% 15.07M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.318G855216Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.013G150013APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
973.7M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
946.9M150016Unknown [32361]U Wisconsin [59]Iperf
923.6M150019U Wisconsin [59]Unknown [32361]Iperf
904.4M150016LBL [16]Abilene [11537]Iperf
827.6M150021Unknown [32361]U Chicago [160]Iperf
715.2M116710U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]Iperf
686.7M150014U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
588.9M150011Unknown [32361]U Texas, Arlington [18515]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
798.7M150010Georgia Institute of Technology [2637]Abilene [11537]33257 -> 3002
642.2M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]49697 -> 3002
553.4M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]35701 -> 5101
552.2M150040INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
543.4M149710U Florida [6356]Abilene [11537]55155 -> 3002
446.1M150054Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
436.3M150012Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
423.5M150016Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63034 -> 50002
409.3M150010Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
402.0M150037U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.212k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.21% 538.3T 45.55% 750.0G
Encrypted Traffic7.08% 86.26T 7.06% 116.2G
File Sharing1.94% 23.68T 1.73% 28.51G
Advanced Apps1.79% 21.75T 1.47% 24.17G
Misc1.72% 20.89T 3.50% 57.63G
Audio/Video0.92% 11.16T 0.76% 12.50G
Measurement0.50% 6.098T 0.53% 8.795G
Games0.39% 4.794T 0.71% 11.71G
Unidentified41.45% 504.7T 38.68% 636.7G
Total100.00% 1.217P 100.00% 1.646T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.07%
1.24%
1.09%
0.81%
---
500.1T
15.09T
13.23T
9.842T
---
43.16%
0.91%
0.81%
0.67%
---
710.5G
15.05G
13.32G
11.06G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.76%
2.74%
0.58%
0.01%
0.00%
---
45.74T
33.31T
7.098T
83.06G
23.45G
---
3.12%
3.34%
0.58%
0.01%
0.02%
---
51.30G
54.91G
9.528G
209.0M
347.0M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.33%
0.32%
0.24%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.56T
4.029T
3.866T
2.898T
911.4G
228.8G
110.8G
41.69G
12.61G
7.875G
7.401G
2.786G
6.739M
---
0.70%
0.23%
0.35%
0.34%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.48G
3.772G
5.794G
5.543G
1.089G
503.2M
151.2M
62.97M
20.01M
10.06M
87.93M
3.795M
47.90k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.65%
0.10%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.15T
1.271T
239.9G
37.45G
34.35G
17.46G
---
1.38%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
---
22.66G
1.046G
226.6M
80.18M
76.09M
89.18M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
X11
Port 0
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.17%
0.18%
0.15%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.29T
2.234T
1.801T
741.3G
672.8G
449.2G
220.9G
109.6G
94.70G
64.01G
60.40G
49.93G
32.47G
23.64G
20.59G
17.09G
5.761G
---
1.69%
0.98%
0.20%
0.08%
0.08%
0.06%
0.22%
0.03%
0.02%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.90G
16.11G
3.268G
1.309G
1.323G
925.7M
3.698G
536.8M
283.4M
839.9M
570.4M
543.9M
76.15M
40.73M
52.64M
140.6M
6.336M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.47%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.783T
4.877T
265.7G
109.7G
73.22G
31.15G
17.05G
6.656G
139.2M
---
0.32%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.225G
6.616G
349.9M
136.1M
95.77M
40.33M
28.10M
12.32M
102.7k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.47%
0.03%
0.00%
---
5.751T
346.1G
0.000
---
0.36%
0.17%
0.00%
---
5.950G
2.844G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.20%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.467T
742.8G
608.6G
587.7G
268.0G
66.81G
53.04G
---
0.23%
0.29%
0.10%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.799G
4.810G
1.676G
618.3M
591.7M
122.5M
95.55M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
41.45%
---
504.7T
---
38.68%
---
636.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.217P
---
100.00%
---
1.646T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 346.1G 0.17% 2.844G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.37M 0.00% 1.232M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 120.7G 0.01% 109.9M
TCP[6]87.80% 1.069P 84.95% 1.398T
UDP[17]8.22% 100.1T 12.20% 200.9G
IPv6[41]0.03% 405.7G 0.04% 673.8M
GRE[47]3.31% 40.36T 2.03% 33.36G
ESP[50]0.58% 7.098T 0.58% 9.528G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.791G 0.00% 45.89M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 83.12G 0.01% 209.4M
Total100.00% 1.217P 100.00% 1.646T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.16% 661.1G
Medium (100-1400B)22.32% 367.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.46% 600.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.07% 17.54G
Total100.00% 1.646T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.92% 1.168P 96.41% 1.587T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 1.638T 0.16% 2.600G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 59.91G 0.02% 253.2M
Other3.94% 47.99T 3.42% 56.27G
Total100.00% 1.217P 100.00% 1.646T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.22% 2.708T 0.12% 1.981G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330012.70% 32.86T 1.34% 22.10G
19351.55% 18.89T 2.33% 38.28G
164021.06% 12.88T 0.97% 15.96G
30740.56% 6.766T 1.81% 29.87G
21280.54% 6.591T 0.50% 8.154G