Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090216

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090216 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 39.28% of octets and 20.37% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.399M 2 10.06M
5 1.498M 8 10.50M
10 1.619M 16 11.03M
50 3.401M 57 18.17M
90 14.20M 59 55.82M
95 24.15M 59 82.05M
99 73.98M 59 159.7M
99.9 185.7M 59 354.1M
99.99 332.0M 59 794.5M
99.999 878.1M 115 2.533G
100 5.011G 119 5.689G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.56% 1.918G
Medium (100-1400B)9.24% 31.51G
Large (1401-1500B)90.19% 307.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.00% 14.54M
Total100.00% 341.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.50% 155.2T 31.65% 107.9G 37.99% 6.524M
Encrypted Traffic7.91% 38.99T 8.11% 27.68G 6.08% 1.044M
File Sharing2.80% 13.80T 2.83% 9.639G 2.23% 382.8k
Advanced Apps2.52% 12.39T 2.50% 8.540G 3.44% 591.5k
Misc0.60% 2.980T 0.72% 2.439G 0.95% 163.3k
Measurement0.46% 2.246T 0.45% 1.547G 0.15% 26.42k
Games0.29% 1.405T 0.29% 993.1M 0.33% 56.63k
Audio/Video0.18% 901.2G 0.19% 647.9M 0.37% 64.02k
Unidentified53.74% 264.7T 53.25% 181.6G 48.45% 8.320M
Total100.00% 492.7T 100.00% 341.1G 100.00% 17.17M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
2.801G900010INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
987.9M150010APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
967.6M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
809.5M150011DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
532.9M150031Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
242.7M150011Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
235.6M149317Brookhaven National Lab [43]S Methodist U [1832]Iperf
208.3M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
205.0M149912NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
189.9M140414NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
905.2M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]34571 -> 3002
760.8M150059INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1022
759.9M150060Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
472.5M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]33159 -> 5101
467.0M150012LATECH [19564]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]50020 -> 57684
437.2M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync
400.4M150013Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
392.9M150017Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63022 -> 50018
382.2M150021CERN1 [1297]BT Customer services network [2614]50248 -> 1093
380.4M144012MIT [3]Unknown [0]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.364k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.80% 549.4T 44.50% 745.3G
Encrypted Traffic6.06% 76.06T 6.27% 104.9G
File Sharing2.06% 25.79T 1.92% 32.24G
Misc1.70% 21.27T 3.88% 65.02G
Advanced Apps1.68% 21.02T 1.38% 23.18G
Audio/Video0.89% 11.17T 0.74% 12.32G
Games0.39% 4.848T 0.68% 11.31G
Measurement0.33% 4.136T 0.44% 7.412G
Unidentified43.10% 540.6T 40.19% 673.1G
Total100.00% 1.254P 100.00% 1.674T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
40.82%
1.16%
1.10%
0.73%
---
512.0T
14.55T
13.78T
9.095T
---
42.16%
0.87%
0.82%
0.65%
---
706.1G
14.59G
13.73G
10.86G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.02%
2.58%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.86T
32.31T
5.773T
100.2G
11.39G
---
2.63%
3.14%
0.48%
0.01%
0.00%
---
44.10G
52.51G
8.076G
237.3M
47.03M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.07%
0.33%
0.30%
0.25%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.45T
4.167T
3.707T
3.146T
893.5G
192.9G
166.2G
35.88G
10.40G
7.902G
5.347G
3.866G
41.37M
---
0.79%
0.47%
0.21%
0.34%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.30G
7.816G
3.511G
5.754G
1.034G
436.4M
213.3M
50.68M
16.85M
93.44M
7.864M
3.814M
134.3k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
Telnet
NTP
RTIP
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.16%
0.20%
0.13%
0.07%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.50T
2.502T
1.642T
866.9G
616.8G
439.9G
217.2G
110.8G
74.31G
65.38G
63.68G
59.13G
42.11G
41.06G
16.79G
9.451G
482.0M
---
1.70%
1.41%
0.17%
0.09%
0.07%
0.05%
0.21%
0.03%
0.01%
0.03%
0.05%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
28.42G
23.66G
2.930G
1.498G
1.147G
916.8M
3.595G
492.0M
136.0M
571.3M
835.6M
504.6M
53.91M
74.20M
135.2M
44.30M
2.588M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
1.54%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.33T
1.238T
293.9G
65.23G
62.26G
28.90G
---
1.28%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.39G
1.046G
265.0M
153.3M
238.3M
88.98M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.45%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.615T
5.073T
256.2G
116.1G
67.50G
25.70G
14.85G
8.877G
293.5M
---
0.30%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.995G
6.657G
342.9M
145.8M
98.01M
38.29M
24.34M
18.86M
216.5k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.21%
0.05%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.687T
640.9G
584.6G
581.1G
225.0G
67.77G
61.58G
---
0.24%
0.26%
0.10%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
4.039G
4.316G
1.632G
603.9M
511.2M
109.6M
99.17M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.30%
0.03%
0.00%
---
3.763T
372.9G
22.54M
---
0.26%
0.19%
0.00%
---
4.282G
3.130G
15.10k
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
43.10%
---
540.6T
---
40.19%
---
673.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.254P
---
100.00%
---
1.674T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 372.9G 0.19% 3.130G
IGMP[2]0.00% 90.66M 0.00% 1.253M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 92.20G 0.00% 83.28M
TCP[6]90.90% 1.140P 86.18% 1.443T
UDP[17]7.51% 94.17T 12.27% 205.5G
IPv6[41]0.04% 528.3G 0.05% 784.8M
GRE[47]1.04% 13.06T 0.81% 13.52G
ESP[50]0.46% 5.773T 0.48% 8.076G
AX.25[93]0.00% 20.42M 0.00% 14.00k
PIM[103]0.00% 5.344G 0.00% 44.89M
IPMP[169]0.00% 22.54M 0.00% 15.10k
Other0.01% 105.6G 0.01% 241.3M
Total100.00% 1.254P 100.00% 1.674T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.85% 667.5G
Medium (100-1400B)21.53% 360.6G
Large (1401-1500B)38.52% 645.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 1.661G
Total100.00% 1.674T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.43% 1.209P 96.73% 1.620T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.12% 1.453T 0.14% 2.406G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 66.59G 0.02% 267.2M
Other3.45% 43.31T 3.11% 52.15G
Total100.00% 1.254P 100.00% 1.674T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.11% 1.382T 0.06% 1.067G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
330011.79% 22.45T 0.90% 15.09G
19351.37% 17.19T 2.12% 35.58G
164021.03% 12.97T 0.96% 16.10G
600110.84% 10.51T 0.68% 11.37G
30740.55% 6.855T 1.75% 29.26G