Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090209

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090209 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.37% of octets and 17.55% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.397M 2 10.05M
5 1.494M 8 10.43M
10 1.610M 15 10.93M
50 3.341M 57 17.19M
90 13.43M 59 49.35M
95 23.70M 59 70.65M
99 75.28M 59 152.7M
99.9 190.7M 59 476.2M
99.99 375.5M 60 1.732G
99.999 764.5M 119 2.894G
100 8.100G 126 3.553G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.93% 2.691G
Medium (100-1400B)11.29% 32.60G
Large (1401-1500B)87.77% 253.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.01% 28.01M
Total100.00% 288.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers38.19% 158.1T 38.16% 110.2G 44.20% 6.756M
Encrypted Traffic9.01% 37.32T 9.14% 26.41G 6.23% 952.7k
Advanced Apps3.02% 12.52T 3.00% 8.661G 3.78% 577.9k
File Sharing2.78% 11.53T 2.74% 7.909G 2.14% 327.0k
Measurement0.73% 3.030T 0.75% 2.160G 0.20% 31.02k
Misc0.67% 2.794T 0.88% 2.545G 1.05% 161.1k
Games0.36% 1.487T 0.37% 1.061G 0.39% 59.47k
Audio/Video0.21% 884.5G 0.22% 635.7M 0.42% 63.46k
Unidentified45.01% 186.3T 44.75% 129.2G 41.58% 6.355M
Total100.00% 414.0T 100.00% 288.8G 100.00% 15.28M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.024G150013APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
676.9M150020SLAC [3671]Unknown [32361]Iperf
583.5M150024Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
507.3M150027ENTIRETY [22638]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
487.4M150028ESnet-East [291]Unknown [32361]Iperf
468.7M150013Brookhaven National Lab [43]ENTIRETY [22638]Iperf
303.5M900032NASA-AERONET [10343]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
297.8M150014Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
272.4M149625Brookhaven National Lab [43]S Methodist U [1832]Iperf
209.0M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
622.0M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]55319 -> 5101
528.8M128812Unknown [32361]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]37133 -> 46510
477.0M150060INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Unknown [32440]988 -> 1021
472.7M150017Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1020 -> 988
418.3M150012Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63014 -> 50002
369.6M150013Abilene [11537]Merit [237]Rsync
361.9M150043BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]NCSA [1224]SSH
354.6M150023Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50326 -> 49788
353.9M150021NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]FTP
347.4M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.184k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers48.49% 567.5T 46.80% 770.3G
Encrypted Traffic6.52% 76.31T 6.41% 105.4G
File Sharing1.97% 23.11T 1.79% 29.43G
Misc1.89% 22.18T 3.57% 58.82G
Advanced Apps1.77% 20.75T 1.41% 23.21G
Audio/Video0.93% 10.88T 0.74% 12.23G
Measurement0.42% 4.963T 0.49% 7.984G
Games0.42% 4.860T 0.68% 11.13G
Unidentified37.58% 439.9T 38.11% 627.3G
Total100.00% 1.170P 100.00% 1.645T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
45.27%
1.28%
1.18%
0.76%
---
529.9T
14.97T
13.80T
8.842T
---
44.45%
0.91%
0.81%
0.64%
---
731.5G
14.91G
13.30G
10.53G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.01%
2.79%
0.71%
0.01%
0.00%
---
35.25T
32.70T
8.270T
80.68G
10.26G
---
2.45%
3.30%
0.64%
0.01%
0.00%
---
40.32G
54.31G
10.54G
191.6M
44.52M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.96%
0.33%
0.33%
0.26%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.18T
3.880T
3.810T
2.986T
854.2G
221.1G
128.1G
24.24G
13.99G
8.571G
4.886G
3.023G
402.6M
---
0.70%
0.42%
0.22%
0.34%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.49G
6.912G
3.586G
5.581G
1.004G
496.5M
173.4M
36.70M
19.99M
103.8M
19.19M
5.617M
534.9k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
RTIP
NTP
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.27%
0.18%
0.15%
0.13%
0.06%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.88T
2.158T
1.718T
1.552T
676.3G
501.0G
224.0G
117.9G
65.60G
63.11G
62.73G
61.53G
39.51G
26.05G
16.07G
11.84G
651.5M
---
1.79%
0.96%
0.14%
0.17%
0.07%
0.06%
0.22%
0.03%
0.03%
0.05%
0.01%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.41G
15.73G
2.298G
2.822G
1.075G
984.3M
3.682G
507.4M
544.8M
826.7M
102.7M
532.8M
74.59M
38.23M
127.2M
45.14M
4.786M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.64%
0.11%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.21T
1.264T
157.2G
59.66G
40.89G
18.70G
---
1.31%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.60G
1.050G
151.2M
144.8M
109.4M
148.1M
Audio/Video
Real Player
Any-Source Multicast
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.45%
0.43%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.324T
5.085T
254.9G
98.11G
69.58G
24.09G
21.33G
6.356G
40.40M
---
0.43%
0.28%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.030G
4.565G
342.1M
126.6M
89.48M
28.65M
33.81M
14.53M
29.80k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.39%
0.03%
0.00%
---
4.612T
350.6G
750.0k
---
0.31%
0.18%
0.00%
---
5.061G
2.923G
500.0
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.22%
0.06%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.558T
693.6G
629.7G
624.2G
235.7G
63.44G
55.92G
---
0.24%
0.04%
0.25%
0.10%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.936G
717.5M
4.136G
1.625G
517.3M
111.7M
92.81M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.58%
---
439.9T
---
38.11%
---
627.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.170P
---
100.00%
---
1.645T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 350.6G 0.18% 2.923G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.50M 0.00% 1.225M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 112.8G 0.01% 95.78M
TCP[6]91.08% 1.066P 84.48% 1.390T
UDP[17]7.09% 83.02T 13.89% 228.6G
IPv6[41]0.06% 729.1G 0.06% 920.7M
GRE[47]1.02% 11.89T 0.73% 12.00G
ESP[50]0.71% 8.270T 0.64% 10.54G
AX.25[93]0.00% 1.056M 0.00% 800.0
PIM[103]0.00% 6.592G 0.00% 46.44M
IPMP[169]0.00% 750.0k 0.00% 500.0
Other0.01% 80.94G 0.01% 192.3M
Total100.00% 1.170P 100.00% 1.645T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.42% 698.1G
Medium (100-1400B)21.52% 354.1G
Large (1401-1500B)36.00% 592.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 955.2M
Total100.00% 1.645T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.91% 1.122P 96.66% 1.590T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 1.692T 0.16% 2.644G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 69.18G 0.02% 277.4M
Other3.94% 46.15T 3.16% 52.05G
Total100.00% 1.170P 100.00% 1.645T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.12% 1.353T 0.06% 1.015G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.46% 17.13T 2.09% 34.32G
164021.11% 13.01T 0.98% 16.14G
600110.84% 9.866T 0.65% 10.67G
9880.59% 6.946T 0.34% 5.622G
30740.58% 6.806T 1.76% 28.96G