Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090126

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090126 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Thursday, Friday, Saturday, Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/3 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.36% of octets and 17.13% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.399M 1 10.05M
5 1.491M 8 10.45M
10 1.601M 15 10.95M
50 3.173M 57 17.23M
90 14.36M 59 50.70M
95 26.82M 59 75.96M
99 71.33M 59 165.3M
99.9 202.2M 59 402.3M
99.99 737.8M 59 2.220G
99.999 5.062G 133 16.74G
100 57.60G 134 19.53G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.77% 2.130G
Medium (100-1400B)10.54% 29.08G
Large (1401-1500B)88.27% 243.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.41% 1.137G
Total100.00% 275.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.21% 138.6T 35.14% 96.93G 40.93% 5.959M
Encrypted Traffic9.82% 39.80T 10.03% 27.68G 7.38% 1.074M
Measurement3.28% 13.31T 1.52% 4.198G 0.21% 30.99k
Advanced Apps3.02% 12.24T 3.06% 8.437G 3.97% 577.9k
File Sharing2.74% 11.10T 2.76% 7.614G 2.17% 316.0k
Misc0.71% 2.879T 0.83% 2.281G 1.11% 161.1k
Games0.31% 1.273T 0.32% 895.5M 0.36% 52.38k
Audio/Video0.13% 527.6G 0.14% 388.4M 0.24% 35.62k
Unidentified45.77% 185.5T 46.19% 127.4G 43.62% 6.351M
Total100.00% 405.3T 100.00% 275.8G 100.00% 14.55M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.769G900020DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.028G900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
979.1M150020APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
691.0M900015PSC-NCNE [5050]TACCNET [32093]Iperf
592.4M150030Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
520.8M150011ENTIRETY [22638]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
482.1M150033Brookhaven National Lab [43]ENTIRETY [22638]Iperf
206.0M150019NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
205.3M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
181.5M139418NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
980.5M900010ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]3003 -> 42336
499.3M898710High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]55117 -> 5101
489.8M150014INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]988 -> 1022
405.8M150016Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63002 -> 50001
404.1M150059BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]NCSA [1224]SSH
397.2M144325CERN1 [1297]Unknown [39590]39500 -> 1095
365.4M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
348.0M150014JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
334.1M150010NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]FTP
321.5M149835CERN1 [1297]BT Customer services network [2614]34262 -> 1093

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.145k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers47.33% 558.4T 47.23% 760.5G
Encrypted Traffic6.85% 80.77T 7.03% 113.1G
Misc2.42% 28.56T 3.96% 63.78G
File Sharing1.87% 22.03T 1.72% 27.76G
Advanced Apps1.78% 21.05T 1.49% 23.99G
Measurement1.31% 15.42T 0.64% 10.32G
Audio/Video1.02% 12.04T 0.84% 13.45G
Games0.37% 4.336T 0.62% 10.00G
Unidentified37.05% 437.2T 36.47% 587.3G
Total100.00% 1.179P 100.00% 1.610T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
44.52%
1.20%
1.17%
0.43%
---
525.3T
14.20T
13.86T
5.045T
---
45.01%
0.87%
0.84%
0.51%
---
724.8G
13.99G
13.49G
8.170G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.43%
2.59%
0.81%
0.01%
0.00%
---
40.50T
30.52T
9.599T
132.9G
10.71G
---
2.92%
3.32%
0.77%
0.02%
0.00%
---
47.08G
53.44G
12.32G
273.7M
44.89M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
AFS
NFS
X11
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.26%
0.67%
0.19%
0.10%
0.06%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.88T
7.911T
2.231T
1.143T
727.3G
654.0G
415.7G
164.5G
127.0G
91.46G
84.74G
49.13G
36.38G
29.26G
15.55G
5.565G
438.2M
---
1.82%
0.40%
1.07%
0.14%
0.07%
0.04%
0.05%
0.16%
0.03%
0.07%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
29.29G
6.472G
17.27G
2.252G
1.131G
621.9M
847.1M
2.615G
484.0M
1.190G
792.4M
499.8M
87.60M
50.37M
128.5M
41.72M
2.564M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.84%
0.36%
0.34%
0.23%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.861T
4.221T
3.990T
2.749T
835.7G
193.4G
114.1G
21.63G
18.55G
15.53G
9.176G
2.111G
6.531M
---
0.65%
0.24%
0.38%
0.34%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.39G
3.892G
6.126G
5.511G
1.028G
477.9M
157.5M
27.05M
26.56M
14.88M
112.3M
2.583M
64.63k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.63%
0.12%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.23T
1.404T
346.4G
52.92G
12.26G
1.993G
---
1.38%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
22.29G
1.145G
365.3M
99.22M
70.83M
15.28M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.28%
0.07%
0.00%
---
15.06T
844.2G
0.000
---
0.45%
0.45%
0.00%
---
7.228G
7.217G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
Camarades webcams
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.59%
0.39%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.975T
4.620T
262.5G
90.92G
46.27G
21.47G
17.81G
5.998G
115.8M
---
0.39%
0.41%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.291G
6.542G
369.1M
118.2M
68.65M
28.25M
26.79M
14.05M
85.40k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.21%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.423T
596.6G
507.6G
471.1G
234.6G
58.33G
44.87G
---
0.23%
0.23%
0.09%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.702G
3.651G
1.474G
515.2M
479.4M
96.25M
89.14M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.05%
---
437.2T
---
36.47%
---
587.3G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.179P
---
100.00%
---
1.610T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 844.2G 0.45% 7.217G
IGMP[2]0.00% 39.96M 0.00% 1.155M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 101.5G 0.01% 99.99M
TCP[6]90.76% 1.070P 85.97% 1.384T
UDP[17]7.63% 90.00T 12.43% 200.2G
IPv6[41]0.04% 513.7G 0.06% 976.8M
GRE[47]0.71% 8.323T 0.56% 8.940G
ESP[50]0.81% 9.599T 0.77% 12.32G
AX.25[93]0.00% 10.50k 0.00% 233.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.933G 0.00% 46.82M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 133.5G 0.02% 280.1M
Total100.00% 1.179P 100.00% 1.610T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.06% 661.2G
Medium (100-1400B)22.07% 355.4G
Large (1401-1500B)36.71% 591.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.16% 2.500G
Total100.00% 1.610T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.22% 1.147P 97.31% 1.567T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.15% 1.768T 0.18% 2.827G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 44.32G 0.01% 191.9M
Other2.62% 30.96T 2.50% 40.31G
Total100.00% 1.179P 100.00% 1.610T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.11% 1.343T 0.06% 976.7M

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164020.55% 6.529T 0.51% 8.167G
19350.48% 5.711T 0.80% 12.81G
330010.30% 3.490T 0.15% 2.342G
30740.28% 3.259T 0.80% 12.85G
600110.23% 2.760T 0.20% 3.241G