Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090119

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090119 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Sunday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/6 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.87% of octets and 17.91% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.05M
5 1.488M 7 10.50M
10 1.597M 15 10.95M
50 3.165M 57 17.27M
90 14.72M 59 50.55M
95 30.11M 59 73.35M
99 91.65M 59 170.2M
99.9 227.9M 59 499.2M
99.99 752.5M 66 2.189G
99.999 5.190G 119 17.53G
100 33.81G 119 46.97G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.37% 3.664G
Medium (100-1400B)10.64% 28.38G
Large (1401-1500B)87.55% 233.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.44% 1.176G
Total100.00% 266.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.11% 133.4T 35.37% 94.40G 41.46% 5.724M
Encrypted Traffic8.54% 33.39T 8.86% 23.64G 7.40% 1.021M
Measurement3.59% 14.05T 1.57% 4.202G 0.22% 30.89k
File Sharing2.96% 11.56T 2.97% 7.930G 2.14% 295.8k
Advanced Apps2.84% 11.12T 2.87% 7.668G 3.82% 527.7k
Misc0.57% 2.232T 0.63% 1.687G 0.91% 125.6k
Games0.31% 1.222T 0.32% 851.2M 0.34% 47.19k
Audio/Video0.14% 541.5G 0.15% 395.7M 0.27% 36.87k
Unidentified46.93% 183.5T 47.25% 126.0G 43.43% 5.995M
Total100.00% 391.0T 100.00% 266.8G 100.00% 13.80M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.285G900060DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.656G900020INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
1.054G900018ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
994.6M150020APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
819.3M150025ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
704.3M150016Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
587.8M150011U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
524.0M150011ENTIRETY [22638]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
501.3M150011Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
497.7M150019Brookhaven National Lab [43]ENTIRETY [22638]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
954.0M150046Unknown [25776]Boston U [111]Audiogalaxy
569.9M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]40259 -> 5101
538.3M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]988 -> 1022
512.3M150060Unknown [32440]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
461.3M150015Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63004 -> 50003
398.1M150050CERN1 [1297]BT Customer services network [2614]60264 -> 1093
396.0M144851CERN1 [1297]Unknown [39590]48866 -> 1095
394.9M150037Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]44656 -> 10000
352.3M150012JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
338.0M150044Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50299 -> 60910

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.088k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.69% 498.1T 44.91% 669.0G
Encrypted Traffic6.70% 73.09T 6.87% 102.3G
File Sharing1.95% 21.22T 1.81% 27.03G
Advanced Apps1.79% 19.49T 1.49% 22.23G
Misc1.78% 19.37T 3.59% 53.44G
Measurement1.48% 16.12T 0.67% 10.01G
Audio/Video0.92% 9.999T 0.80% 11.98G
Games0.38% 4.187T 0.65% 9.657G
Unidentified39.31% 428.5T 39.21% 584.1G
Total100.00% 1.090P 100.00% 1.489T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
42.59%
1.37%
1.24%
0.48%
---
464.3T
14.98T
13.56T
5.231T
---
42.40%
1.02%
0.95%
0.54%
---
631.7G
15.13G
14.16G
8.022G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.00%
2.75%
0.95%
0.01%
0.00%
---
32.67T
29.94T
10.35T
104.7G
9.751G
---
2.58%
3.43%
0.84%
0.02%
0.00%
---
38.44G
51.08G
12.51G
241.5M
43.05M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.88%
0.41%
0.33%
0.22%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.617T
4.480T
3.579T
2.365T
816.1G
201.1G
96.81G
27.39G
12.71G
11.77G
8.647G
1.187G
807.7M
---
0.67%
0.28%
0.43%
0.32%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.965G
4.127G
6.378G
4.782G
994.9M
477.0M
137.1M
35.46M
16.85M
13.81M
104.2M
2.836M
913.3k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.64%
0.13%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.92T
1.385T
137.4G
41.86G
10.22G
2.524G
---
1.39%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.74G
1.140G
160.1M
89.75M
73.35M
27.10M
Misc
Mail
DNS
Port 0
Squid
X11
AFS
MS Windows
NFS
NTP
IRC
RTIP
Telnet
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.16%
0.18%
0.16%
0.13%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.65T
1.920T
1.788T
1.379T
513.9G
404.2G
161.7G
111.9G
108.1G
101.4G
86.09G
43.94G
38.98G
24.89G
15.73G
11.45G
329.1M
---
1.73%
0.96%
0.16%
0.18%
0.07%
0.06%
0.17%
0.01%
0.09%
0.06%
0.05%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.70G
14.27G
2.368G
2.639G
1.004G
875.7M
2.553G
148.7M
1.397G
870.0M
802.0M
507.3M
57.91M
64.67M
128.4M
51.07M
3.413M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.45%
0.04%
0.00%
---
15.79T
390.1G
0.000
---
0.49%
0.21%
0.00%
---
7.277G
3.189G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.49%
0.39%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.364T
4.244T
208.1G
79.04G
58.61G
20.93G
16.75G
6.705G
68.81M
---
0.33%
0.44%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.929G
6.505G
295.7M
102.6M
79.75M
35.39M
24.41M
16.76M
50.75k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.22%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.420T
550.6G
469.0G
462.2G
168.5G
65.76G
50.64G
---
0.25%
0.23%
0.03%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.691G
3.497G
483.3M
1.373G
414.2M
109.8M
86.73M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.31%
---
428.5T
---
39.21%
---
584.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.090P
---
100.00%
---
1.489T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 390.1G 0.21% 3.189G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.74M 0.00% 1.218M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 68.18G 0.00% 69.25M
TCP[6]89.99% 981.0T 84.50% 1.259T
UDP[17]8.54% 93.09T 14.05% 209.3G
IPv6[41]0.04% 467.7G 0.05% 686.8M
GRE[47]0.43% 4.671T 0.36% 5.305G
ESP[50]0.95% 10.35T 0.84% 12.51G
AX.25[93]0.00% 15.40k 0.00% 233.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.460G 0.00% 44.60M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 104.9G 0.02% 243.0M
Total100.00% 1.090P 100.00% 1.489T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.40% 601.9G
Medium (100-1400B)23.69% 352.9G
Large (1401-1500B)35.80% 533.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 1.619G
Total100.00% 1.489T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.82% 1.055P 97.17% 1.447T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.13% 1.364T 0.15% 2.193G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 65.02G 0.02% 236.1M
Other3.05% 33.24T 2.67% 39.72G
Total100.00% 1.090P 100.00% 1.489T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.19% 2.087T 0.10% 1.497G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
82472.71% 29.55T 3.01% 44.84G
19351.59% 17.31T 2.34% 34.81G
164020.95% 10.35T 0.85% 12.67G
600110.70% 7.597T 0.52% 7.805G
30740.45% 4.922T 1.42% 21.22G