Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20090112

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20090112 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 37.34% of octets and 19.13% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 2 10.05M
5 1.490M 8 10.48M
10 1.605M 16 10.95M
50 3.225M 57 17.55M
90 13.53M 59 51.97M
95 25.75M 59 73.05M
99 79.87M 59 169.8M
99.9 204.8M 59 659.5M
99.99 719.4M 59 2.236G
99.999 3.155G 116 7.956G
100 11.82G 119 28.42G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.62% 1.639G
Medium (100-1400B)10.45% 27.58G
Large (1401-1500B)88.56% 233.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.37% 984.7M
Total100.00% 263.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.44% 129.6T 34.21% 90.29G 41.11% 5.542M
Encrypted Traffic7.47% 28.95T 7.73% 20.40G 6.93% 933.8k
Advanced Apps3.11% 12.07T 3.15% 8.323G 4.23% 570.1k
Measurement2.90% 11.25T 1.45% 3.820G 0.30% 40.99k
File Sharing2.80% 10.86T 2.83% 7.465G 2.05% 276.7k
Misc0.82% 3.180T 0.86% 2.282G 1.09% 146.2k
Games0.31% 1.188T 0.32% 845.0M 0.36% 48.78k
Audio/Video0.14% 530.7G 0.15% 393.8M 0.26% 35.58k
Unidentified49.02% 190.0T 49.29% 130.1G 43.66% 5.886M
Total100.00% 387.8T 100.00% 263.9G 100.00% 13.48M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.677G900024DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.961G900019INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
1.046G900012ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.033G824412ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
690.5M150046U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
654.7M150025Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
618.6M900012NASA-AERONET [10343]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
426.7M150011U Chicago [160]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
396.3M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
384.8M150010GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
980.4M150010FAUNET [12013]Abilene [11537]42344 -> 3002
611.6M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]33993 -> 5101
596.5M149960U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
546.4M150011INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]988 -> 1022
500.3M150060Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50063 -> 45815
438.4M892530DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
417.1M150012Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63007 -> 50002
396.0M900012TACCNET [32093]NCSA [1224]35763 -> 50384
393.4M150026JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
361.8M150020Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.066k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.56% 473.1T 45.14% 622.9G
Encrypted Traffic6.25% 64.86T 6.70% 92.49G
Misc2.12% 22.06T 4.10% 56.51G
Advanced Apps1.99% 20.71T 1.71% 23.56G
File Sharing1.96% 20.39T 1.87% 25.78G
Measurement1.28% 13.33T 0.71% 9.734G
Audio/Video1.03% 10.70T 0.87% 12.07G
Games0.38% 3.988T 0.65% 8.944G
Unidentified39.42% 409.3T 38.26% 527.9G
Total100.00% 1.038P 100.00% 1.380T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
42.56%
1.34%
1.14%
0.51%
---
442.0T
13.90T
11.88T
5.330T
---
42.69%
0.96%
0.90%
0.59%
---
589.1G
13.21G
12.43G
8.130G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.78%
2.63%
0.82%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.90T
27.32T
8.488T
127.3G
10.47G
---
3.39%
2.53%
0.77%
0.02%
0.00%
---
46.77G
34.84G
10.57G
256.8M
44.12M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
AFS
X11
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
NFS
RTIP
Telnet
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.36%
0.25%
0.19%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.34T
3.716T
2.626T
1.934T
433.9G
311.4G
165.5G
111.5G
98.93G
89.55G
85.40G
61.98G
27.05G
20.92G
15.82G
10.95G
587.9M
---
1.86%
0.33%
0.19%
1.14%
0.07%
0.05%
0.18%
0.06%
0.09%
0.01%
0.06%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.63G
4.574G
2.631G
15.71G
899.8M
706.8M
2.473G
882.4M
1.297G
119.0M
775.8M
532.5M
40.14M
48.96M
129.9M
46.54M
5.688M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.80%
0.13%
0.05%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.72T
1.368T
538.2G
43.35G
30.97G
7.191G
---
1.57%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.62G
1.153G
558.1M
102.5M
89.59M
36.45M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
Freenet
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.82%
0.45%
0.34%
0.25%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.483T
4.661T
3.571T
2.558T
772.1G
184.2G
98.46G
27.66G
25.90G
8.765G
8.084G
308.3M
22.66M
---
0.65%
0.31%
0.43%
0.35%
0.07%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.934G
4.318G
5.955G
4.885G
958.8M
416.0M
136.2M
28.75M
30.84M
105.5M
11.61M
720.9k
304.3k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.25%
0.03%
0.00%
---
12.98T
349.2G
0.000
---
0.51%
0.19%
0.00%
---
7.047G
2.686G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.61%
0.38%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.347T
3.963T
197.8G
77.97G
55.17G
31.52G
13.51G
13.23G
61.02M
---
0.41%
0.43%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.663G
5.891G
259.0M
103.4M
68.65M
41.53M
23.38M
20.85M
45.00k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.21%
0.05%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.138T
533.0G
520.3G
510.4G
182.9G
62.33G
41.17G
---
0.25%
0.04%
0.22%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.441G
563.1M
3.084G
1.287G
391.7M
103.4M
71.50M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.42%
---
409.3T
---
38.26%
---
527.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.038P
---
100.00%
---
1.380T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 349.2G 0.19% 2.686G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.11M 0.00% 1.201M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 84.23G 0.01% 81.25M
TCP[6]90.55% 940.4T 85.70% 1.182T
UDP[17]7.30% 75.81T 12.36% 170.6G
IPv6[41]0.06% 579.8G 0.05% 697.9M
GRE[47]1.22% 12.65T 0.90% 12.42G
ESP[50]0.82% 8.488T 0.77% 10.57G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 4.697G 0.00% 40.80M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 128.5G 0.02% 260.3M
Total100.00% 1.038P 100.00% 1.380T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)40.21% 554.9G
Medium (100-1400B)21.67% 299.1G
Large (1401-1500B)37.93% 523.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.18% 2.547G
Total100.00% 1.380T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.84% 1.005P 97.00% 1.338T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.12% 1.268T 0.14% 1.940G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 37.76G 0.01% 174.9M
Other3.04% 31.53T 2.85% 39.35G
Total100.00% 1.038P 100.00% 1.380T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.24% 2.513T 0.13% 1.816G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.47% 15.28T 2.01% 27.68G
9881.24% 12.89T 0.66% 9.175G
600110.74% 7.677T 0.61% 8.455G
164020.68% 7.055T 0.63% 8.720G
10210.65% 6.764T 0.33% 4.570G