Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081215

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081215 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 40.15% of octets and 20.73% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.395M 1 10.05M
5 1.496M 7 10.50M
10 1.622M 14 11.02M
50 3.497M 57 18.15M
90 17.10M 59 55.91M
95 29.08M 59 79.80M
99 86.45M 59 184.1M
99.9 234.4M 59 573.9M
99.99 1.312G 59 4.653G
99.999 5.800G 119 17.82G
100 39.72G 120 56.69G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.85% 2.065G
Medium (100-1400B)9.27% 22.42G
Large (1401-1500B)88.88% 215.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.99% 2.403G
Total100.00% 241.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.26% 118.4T 33.91% 82.04G 41.23% 4.864M
Measurement6.76% 24.82T 2.59% 6.275G 0.48% 56.75k
Encrypted Traffic6.37% 23.37T 6.64% 16.05G 6.24% 735.7k
Advanced Apps3.52% 12.93T 3.70% 8.956G 4.90% 578.2k
File Sharing2.90% 10.63T 3.02% 7.311G 2.19% 258.6k
Misc0.57% 2.098T 0.73% 1.763G 0.95% 112.0k
Games0.23% 834.2G 0.24% 586.4M 0.30% 35.66k
Audio/Video0.10% 353.4G 0.11% 257.4M 0.21% 25.02k
Unidentified47.29% 173.5T 49.05% 118.6G 43.49% 5.130M
Total100.00% 367.0T 100.00% 241.9G 100.00% 11.79M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
7.721G900020SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.016G900020DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.063G824416ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.022G900017ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
998.9M900010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]Iperf
979.5M150010U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
731.3M150028Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
454.7M150015U Chicago [160]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
429.5M824454ESnet-West [292]Unknown [0]Iperf
396.2M150020GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.952G900020SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]46799 -> 5023
1.028G900018INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]46581 -> 5150
617.3M150060Unknown [36375]Boston U [111]54321 -> 39569
583.9M150017INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]63002 -> 44755
549.7M150029U Chicago [160]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]47365 -> 64681
460.4M150010Unknown [40623]Abilene [11537]35267 -> 3002
394.1M150011JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
354.2M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
351.4M150010Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]58557 -> 39840
345.8M150010Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 913.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.61% 407.7T 45.70% 533.4G
Encrypted Traffic5.82% 53.15T 6.34% 73.95G
Measurement2.95% 27.00T 1.04% 12.13G
Advanced Apps2.32% 21.24T 2.15% 25.03G
File Sharing2.10% 19.21T 1.89% 22.09G
Misc2.05% 18.75T 4.25% 49.62G
Audio/Video1.05% 9.613T 0.99% 11.49G
Games0.33% 3.030T 0.58% 6.789G
Unidentified38.76% 354.2T 37.07% 432.6G
Total100.00% 914.0T 100.00% 1.167T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
41.23%
1.39%
1.24%
0.74%
---
376.8T
12.71T
11.31T
6.804T
---
42.93%
1.11%
0.95%
0.71%
---
501.0G
12.98G
11.09G
8.295G
Encrypted Traffic
HTTPS
SSH
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.67%
2.58%
0.56%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.42T
23.54T
5.093T
80.38G
16.37G
---
3.28%
2.45%
0.59%
0.02%
0.01%
---
38.28G
28.56G
6.857G
187.4M
60.69M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.92%
0.04%
0.00%
---
26.68T
319.9G
0.000
---
0.80%
0.24%
0.00%
---
9.327G
2.807G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
2.04%
0.17%
0.10%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.62T
1.575T
928.7G
79.64G
35.16G
4.505G
---
1.94%
0.11%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.66G
1.329G
779.2M
151.4M
70.00M
40.81M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
Shoutcast
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.92%
0.48%
0.33%
0.28%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.366T
4.402T
3.005T
2.540T
628.7G
113.2G
76.69G
63.88G
5.515G
5.451G
4.923G
3.109G
36.95M
---
0.70%
0.35%
0.41%
0.33%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.128G
4.076G
4.731G
3.885G
762.0M
248.9M
107.3M
68.97M
9.420M
65.70M
6.068M
3.991M
100.1k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
AFS
X11
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
RTIP
NFS
Telnet
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.30%
0.24%
0.20%
0.18%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.91T
2.219T
1.812T
1.642T
356.6G
298.1G
117.0G
81.08G
71.90G
64.10G
57.16G
45.26G
24.48G
17.40G
16.44G
16.38G
1.823G
---
2.18%
0.29%
1.14%
0.16%
0.07%
0.06%
0.12%
0.03%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.40G
3.366G
13.28G
1.885G
781.0M
700.0M
1.431G
369.6M
924.3M
612.1M
86.44M
483.0M
71.26M
32.32M
51.07M
137.1M
5.541M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.66%
0.35%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.013T
3.186T
275.1G
53.57G
47.52G
18.64G
9.262G
9.258G
6.644M
---
0.47%
0.46%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.530G
5.421G
337.2M
74.54M
64.30M
27.65M
17.64M
24.66M
4.900k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.21%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.877T
388.1G
324.7G
251.5G
132.6G
29.01G
26.92G
---
0.24%
0.20%
0.08%
0.02%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
2.831G
2.369G
936.3M
270.3M
273.9M
54.09M
53.88M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.76%
---
354.2T
---
37.07%
---
432.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
914.0T
---
100.00%
---
1.167T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 319.9G 0.24% 2.807G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.04M 0.00% 1.198M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 84.29G 0.01% 82.43M
TCP[6]91.25% 834.0T 87.07% 1.016T
UDP[17]6.62% 60.49T 10.79% 125.9G
IPv6[41]0.03% 262.2G 0.03% 345.9M
GRE[47]1.49% 13.59T 1.26% 14.68G
ESP[50]0.56% 5.093T 0.59% 6.857G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.264G 0.00% 37.09M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 80.51G 0.02% 188.8M
Total100.00% 914.0T 100.00% 1.167T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.65% 462.8G
Medium (100-1400B)20.33% 237.3G
Large (1401-1500B)39.45% 460.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.57% 6.704G
Total100.00% 1.167T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.41% 890.3T 97.22% 1.134T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.14% 1.268T 0.16% 1.847G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 38.05G 0.01% 161.4M
Other2.45% 22.36T 2.61% 30.46G
Total100.00% 914.0T 100.00% 1.167T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.33% 3.028T 0.19% 2.270G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.44% 13.14T 2.03% 23.70G
21280.45% 4.128T 0.45% 5.197G
164020.45% 4.073T 0.44% 5.112G
600110.41% 3.738T 0.36% 4.234G
150000.38% 3.494T 0.40% 4.689G