Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081201

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081201 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.40% of octets and 16.79% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.394M 1 10.05M
5 1.484M 7 10.45M
10 1.592M 15 10.94M
50 3.110M 57 17.13M
90 13.48M 59 49.41M
95 25.79M 59 70.00M
99 99.27M 59 156.3M
99.9 204.3M 59 452.7M
99.99 652.5M 98 2.224G
99.999 2.051G 123 6.403G
100 13.40G 124 14.67G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.01% 2.556G
Medium (100-1400B)10.88% 27.59G
Large (1401-1500B)87.80% 222.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.31% 793.0M
Total100.00% 253.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.90% 124.9T 34.37% 87.15G 39.01% 5.323M
Encrypted Traffic7.46% 27.48T 7.99% 20.25G 5.43% 740.3k
Advanced Apps3.06% 11.27T 3.07% 7.785G 3.77% 514.8k
File Sharing2.89% 10.66T 2.92% 7.399G 2.24% 305.3k
Measurement2.66% 9.798T 1.30% 3.284G 0.30% 41.30k
Misc0.56% 2.046T 0.66% 1.674G 0.87% 119.4k
Games0.32% 1.187T 0.33% 831.7M 0.36% 49.62k
Audio/Video0.15% 553.9G 0.15% 390.5M 0.28% 38.71k
Unidentified49.01% 180.6T 49.22% 124.8G 47.73% 6.512M
Total100.00% 368.6T 100.00% 253.5G 100.00% 13.64M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.914G150030SDSC [195]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.676G900010DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
1.061G824418ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
572.7M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
421.3M150022GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
384.1M150032U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
254.8M150019CERN [513]Unknown [32361]Iperf
254.4M900020NASA-AERONET [10343]NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Iperf
253.3M137335Harvard [11]PSC-NCNE [5050]Iperf
238.7M150052Unknown [0]Unknown [32920]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.020G900020INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]52623 -> 5150
753.8M150010USC-OBERON [47]Abilene [11537]52452 -> 3002
541.3M150012INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]988 -> 709
507.7M150016U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
374.1M150013Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63020 -> 50002
373.7M150017JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
362.6M150011NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
340.5M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
315.7M150060Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50168 -> 34037
311.7M150056NOAA [6629]NIST-BOULDER [2648]FTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.083k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.86% 502.1T 47.19% 712.4G
Encrypted Traffic5.41% 57.99T 5.67% 85.58G
File Sharing1.98% 21.21T 1.82% 27.46G
Advanced Apps1.85% 19.78T 1.46% 22.07G
Misc1.84% 19.71T 3.55% 53.62G
Measurement1.16% 12.37T 0.69% 10.35G
Audio/Video0.97% 10.42T 0.86% 13.00G
Games0.41% 4.365T 0.69% 10.45G
Unidentified39.52% 423.5T 38.07% 574.8G
Total100.00% 1.071P 100.00% 1.509T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.99%
1.24%
1.03%
0.61%
---
471.3T
13.26T
11.03T
6.535T
---
44.93%
0.87%
0.75%
0.63%
---
678.4G
13.12G
11.36G
9.555G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.70%
2.24%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.89T
24.02T
4.973T
86.63G
8.870G
---
2.31%
2.89%
0.45%
0.01%
0.00%
---
34.93G
43.59G
6.788G
216.8M
40.82M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
Shoutcast
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Blubster
Carracho
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.83%
0.41%
0.36%
0.26%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.879T
4.396T
3.847T
2.828T
811.2G
267.8G
103.8G
43.64G
20.93G
10.71G
7.559G
2.216G
89.03M
---
0.64%
0.26%
0.43%
0.35%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.704G
3.973G
6.496G
5.283G
1.006G
623.1M
150.2M
55.19M
18.65M
132.7M
13.44M
4.106M
642.4k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
1.63%
0.13%
0.07%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
17.51T
1.425T
772.8G
45.92G
21.88G
1.017G
---
1.33%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
20.02G
1.186G
649.8M
91.06M
122.1M
2.812M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
MS Windows
IRC
NFS
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
AOL AIM
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.19%
0.21%
0.18%
0.11%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.76T
2.295T
1.900T
1.231T
488.4G
458.9G
104.8G
93.37G
74.02G
70.88G
68.89G
50.05G
41.01G
27.68G
22.70G
18.23G
724.8M
---
1.73%
0.18%
1.07%
0.15%
0.07%
0.07%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.06%
0.04%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
26.09G
2.740G
16.10G
2.249G
1.027G
1.048G
1.245G
511.9M
119.6M
923.2M
670.6M
507.6M
74.86M
80.22M
56.94M
160.3M
5.534M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.09%
0.07%
0.00%
---
11.67T
702.8G
1.200M
---
0.43%
0.25%
0.00%
---
6.560G
3.790G
800.0
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.58%
0.34%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.234T
3.675T
237.4G
172.2G
59.36G
29.64G
10.22G
10.04G
18.44M
---
0.37%
0.44%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.629G
6.698G
325.2M
187.7M
83.01M
45.33M
16.05M
24.30M
13.60k
Games
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.24%
0.05%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.563T
578.6G
486.2G
368.9G
262.6G
65.51G
38.97G
---
0.27%
0.25%
0.10%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
4.031G
3.845G
1.458G
431.1M
486.1M
134.0M
68.82M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.52%
---
423.5T
---
38.07%
---
574.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.071P
---
100.00%
---
1.509T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.07% 702.8G 0.25% 3.790G
IGMP[2]0.00% 44.12M 0.00% 1.202M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 100.3G 0.01% 98.16M
TCP[6]90.89% 973.8T 86.61% 1.307T
UDP[17]7.64% 81.86T 11.90% 179.6G
IPv6[41]0.03% 283.5G 0.03% 429.9M
GRE[47]0.90% 9.634T 0.74% 11.15G
ESP[50]0.46% 4.973T 0.45% 6.788G
AX.25[93]0.00% 2.473M 0.00% 2.200k
PIM[103]0.00% 5.262G 0.00% 37.99M
IPMP[169]0.00% 1.200M 0.00% 800.0
Other0.01% 87.34G 0.01% 219.3M
Total100.00% 1.071P 100.00% 1.509T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.74% 645.3G
Medium (100-1400B)21.70% 327.7G
Large (1401-1500B)35.47% 535.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 1.240G
Total100.00% 1.509T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.09% 1.040P 96.81% 1.461T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 2.266T 0.23% 3.483G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 48.83G 0.01% 203.4M
Other2.69% 28.84T 2.95% 44.52G
Total100.00% 1.071P 100.00% 1.509T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.18% 1.933T 0.10% 1.547G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.43% 15.28T 2.21% 33.33G
164021.41% 15.10T 1.24% 18.77G
600111.23% 13.12T 0.91% 13.69G
200001.08% 11.54T 0.71% 10.65G
200010.74% 7.898T 0.49% 7.459G