Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081117

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081117 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 34.03% of octets and 17.20% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.05M
5 1.494M 7 10.50M
10 1.613M 14 10.95M
50 3.341M 57 17.55M
90 16.26M 59 54.95M
95 27.06M 59 81.45M
99 84.49M 59 160.0M
99.9 217.8M 59 502.8M
99.99 900.5M 60 2.532G
99.999 2.896G 136 17.11G
100 13.92G 146 44.26G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.31% 3.510G
Medium (100-1400B)9.92% 26.59G
Large (1401-1500B)88.31% 236.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.47% 1.251G
Total100.00% 268.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.56% 116.2T 30.15% 80.86G 38.08% 5.108M
Encrypted Traffic8.52% 33.49T 9.56% 25.64G 5.70% 764.8k
Advanced Apps3.68% 14.46T 3.68% 9.875G 4.22% 566.8k
Measurement3.51% 13.82T 1.65% 4.427G 0.28% 37.84k
File Sharing3.13% 12.32T 3.16% 8.460G 2.55% 342.5k
Misc0.52% 2.057T 0.55% 1.481G 0.88% 118.6k
Games0.25% 1.001T 0.27% 723.2M 0.32% 42.43k
Audio/Video0.12% 476.7G 0.13% 335.9M 0.26% 34.28k
Unidentified50.70% 199.4T 50.85% 136.3G 47.71% 6.400M
Total100.00% 393.3T 100.00% 268.1G 100.00% 13.41M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.941G869360SCXY [14031]Unknown [32361]Iperf
5.492G900029DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
5.085G900060Unknown [32361]SCXY [14031]Iperf
1.616G900058INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
993.9M150012SCXY [14031]Abilene [11537]Iperf
952.7M900010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]Iperf
745.4M824417ESnet-West [292]Abilene [11537]Iperf
418.2M150010U Chicago [160]Unknown [32361]Iperf
394.1M150014GEORGE-MASON-UNIV [11279]U Chicago [160]Iperf
364.0M150013Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.031G900016INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]54334 -> 5150
674.4M150010Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]50712 -> 10000
504.3M900012NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]56906 -> 50000
474.2M900018TACCNET [32093]NCSA [1224]35135 -> 50001
454.6M150031ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]43313 -> 10000
431.4M150010Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]51655 -> 10000
412.5M150013Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63025 -> 50002
397.8M150010Rutgers [46]Abilene [11537]39468 -> 3002
396.9M150022JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
390.2M150015Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 1.033k.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.32% 489.2T 44.82% 698.9G
Encrypted Traffic5.49% 63.47T 5.96% 92.92G
Misc2.85% 32.95T 3.38% 52.70G
File Sharing2.53% 29.20T 2.42% 37.79G
Measurement2.50% 28.94T 0.97% 15.10G
Advanced Apps2.08% 24.01T 1.68% 26.20G
Audio/Video1.26% 14.58T 1.05% 16.32G
Games0.35% 4.078T 0.63% 9.892G
Unidentified40.62% 469.5T 39.09% 609.5G
Total100.00% 1.156P 100.00% 1.559T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
39.70%
1.12%
1.02%
0.48%
---
458.9T
13.00T
11.74T
5.515T
---
42.72%
0.84%
0.73%
0.54%
---
666.1G
13.06G
11.41G
8.349G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.13%
1.94%
0.41%
0.01%
0.00%
---
36.21T
22.42T
4.721T
101.4G
10.95G
---
2.88%
2.64%
0.41%
0.02%
0.00%
---
44.97G
41.20G
6.469G
235.4M
41.43M
Misc
Port 0
Mail
Squid
DNS
AFS
X11
MS Windows
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
NFS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SOCKS
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.36%
1.07%
0.15%
0.13%
0.05%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.73T
12.34T
1.765T
1.529T
551.6G
428.7G
94.16G
87.82G
71.40G
67.99G
64.73G
63.86G
50.63G
40.83G
33.01G
17.56G
1.114G
---
0.47%
1.51%
0.20%
0.75%
0.08%
0.07%
0.08%
0.03%
0.06%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
7.347G
23.60G
3.182G
11.77G
1.310G
1.125G
1.228G
417.3M
931.7M
669.0M
640.1M
98.56M
77.37M
74.12M
59.39M
151.2M
16.76M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.76%
0.38%
0.33%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.94T
8.814T
4.434T
3.811T
776.0G
269.7G
85.73G
37.78G
11.60G
10.56G
4.485G
1.566G
40.55M
---
0.69%
0.94%
0.26%
0.41%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.77G
14.68G
4.007G
6.401G
966.3M
611.5M
127.8M
48.68M
142.8M
18.20M
6.975M
2.279M
149.5k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.47%
0.03%
0.00%
---
28.59T
354.3G
0.000
---
0.78%
0.19%
0.00%
---
12.12G
2.977G
0.000
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.47%
0.46%
0.12%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.98T
5.296T
1.410T
274.6G
34.69G
14.14G
---
1.24%
0.34%
0.08%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
19.30G
5.267G
1.188G
247.6M
79.30M
111.2M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.92%
0.31%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.59T
3.616T
173.3G
102.9G
57.43G
29.20G
11.05G
6.244G
24.95M
---
0.58%
0.43%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.991G
6.750G
261.9M
127.9M
115.8M
39.60M
19.30M
16.38M
18.40k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.21%
0.05%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.374T
522.0G
519.4G
356.1G
175.0G
80.76G
50.28G
---
0.24%
0.09%
0.23%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.780G
1.428G
3.577G
433.2M
393.1M
177.6M
101.6M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.62%
---
469.5T
---
39.09%
---
609.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.156P
---
100.00%
---
1.559T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 354.3G 0.19% 2.977G
IGMP[2]0.00% 41.25M 0.00% 1.201M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 97.01G 0.01% 82.91M
TCP[6]85.64% 990.0T 84.56% 1.318T
UDP[17]11.89% 137.5T 13.22% 206.1G
IPv6[41]0.02% 275.9G 0.03% 449.9M
GRE[47]1.98% 22.93T 1.56% 24.30G
ESP[50]0.41% 4.721T 0.41% 6.469G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.198G 0.00% 38.12M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 101.8G 0.02% 239.3M
Total100.00% 1.156P 100.00% 1.559T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.00% 654.8G
Medium (100-1400B)21.97% 342.6G
Large (1401-1500B)35.30% 550.4G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.73% 11.40G
Total100.00% 1.559T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.64% 1.105P 96.51% 1.504T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.21% 2.411T 0.24% 3.744G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 88.92G 0.01% 232.3M
Other4.14% 47.89T 3.24% 50.49G
Total100.00% 1.156P 100.00% 1.559T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable1.47% 16.99T 0.37% 5.783G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19351.56% 18.08T 2.24% 34.98G
164021.40% 16.13T 1.30% 20.29G
520000.98% 11.37T 0.19% 2.907G
600110.65% 7.519T 0.54% 8.389G
200000.62% 7.114T 0.41% 6.374G