Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081103

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081103 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.12% of octets and 15.87% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.05M
5 1.495M 6 10.50M
10 1.618M 11 10.95M
50 3.400M 57 17.55M
90 19.02M 59 51.83M
95 39.98M 59 72.45M
99 93.03M 59 149.8M
99.9 212.9M 59 564.0M
99.99 842.8M 116 1.320G
99.999 1.726G 121 6.139G
100 27.36G 150 11.01G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.38% 3.192G
Medium (100-1400B)11.30% 26.09G
Large (1401-1500B)87.15% 201.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.17% 391.3M
Total100.00% 230.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers35.07% 116.1T 35.08% 81.02G 42.48% 5.053M
Encrypted Traffic10.26% 33.98T 11.29% 26.06G 7.21% 857.4k
Advanced Apps3.52% 11.65T 3.52% 8.125G 4.54% 539.8k
File Sharing3.20% 10.59T 3.16% 7.305G 2.45% 291.1k
Measurement1.45% 4.805T 1.05% 2.435G 0.22% 25.67k
Misc0.76% 2.530T 0.76% 1.760G 1.10% 130.9k
Games0.33% 1.102T 0.33% 766.7M 0.39% 46.20k
Audio/Video0.15% 501.9G 0.15% 354.7M 0.30% 35.93k
Unidentified45.25% 149.9T 44.65% 103.1G 41.32% 4.915M
Total100.00% 331.2T 100.00% 230.9G 100.00% 11.89M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
3.060G900029DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
920.4M150013ESnet-East [291]Unknown [32361]Iperf
834.2M900029INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
777.2M150014Merit [237]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
715.7M150011Merit [237]U Chicago [160]Iperf
658.9M150016BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Merit [237]Iperf
505.1M150012Merit [237]Brookhaven National Lab [43]Iperf
466.4M150011Brookhaven National Lab [43]Unknown [32361]Iperf
454.0M150017Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]Iperf
448.6M150011Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.630G150012Boston U [111]Brookhaven National Lab [43]51137 -> 20000
1.051G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]32978 -> 5101
1.032G900016INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]ORNL [50]51099 -> 5150
956.6M150018ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]35969 -> 10000
830.9M150010Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]59538 -> 10000
621.0M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]51159 -> 5101
446.6M150039Brookhaven National Lab [43]Boston U [111]50990 -> 10000
392.0M150026JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
375.8M150014PSC [1207]TACCNET [32093]59963 -> 50017
374.6M150029Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]44749 -> 10000

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 900.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.39% 478.4T 46.38% 674.8G
Encrypted Traffic6.82% 70.35T 6.52% 94.80G
File Sharing2.79% 28.80T 2.91% 42.39G
Misc2.25% 23.20T 3.99% 58.10G
Advanced Apps2.08% 21.44T 1.67% 24.24G
Audio/Video1.43% 14.71T 1.18% 17.17G
Measurement0.67% 6.894T 0.54% 7.926G
Games0.42% 4.309T 0.68% 9.845G
Unidentified37.16% 383.2T 36.12% 525.5G
Total100.00% 1.031P 100.00% 1.454T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
43.32%
1.25%
1.17%
0.65%
---
446.7T
12.88T
12.10T
6.688T
---
44.07%
0.86%
0.85%
0.61%
---
641.1G
12.49G
12.29G
8.854G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.62%
2.12%
1.07%
0.01%
0.00%
---
37.34T
21.83T
11.06T
91.27G
10.00G
---
2.96%
2.69%
0.85%
0.01%
0.00%
---
43.12G
39.13G
12.31G
184.4M
42.04M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.03%
0.87%
0.39%
0.37%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.63T
8.935T
4.033T
3.840T
837.5G
357.1G
94.50G
45.84G
12.65G
7.392G
4.473G
3.917G
1.094G
---
1.47%
0.64%
0.41%
0.24%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.40G
9.341G
6.006G
3.519G
1.019G
726.2M
135.7M
61.27M
156.2M
11.93M
5.171M
6.931M
931.3k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
Squid
DNS
AFS
X11
Telnet
IRC
NTP
NFS
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.27%
0.34%
0.29%
0.20%
0.05%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
13.07T
3.458T
3.035T
2.065T
556.3G
468.5G
115.6G
86.12G
69.40G
62.17G
59.68G
58.14G
30.17G
28.63G
19.07G
13.44G
659.3M
---
2.03%
0.21%
0.30%
1.07%
0.09%
0.07%
0.04%
0.03%
0.06%
0.01%
0.03%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.52G
3.051G
4.344G
15.62G
1.301G
1.025G
591.6M
421.9M
905.8M
99.04M
422.3M
510.5M
59.12M
41.17M
61.09M
109.0M
8.833M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.74%
0.18%
0.13%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
17.98T
1.816T
1.372T
161.7G
60.92G
55.01G
---
1.44%
0.12%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
20.90G
1.714G
1.148G
162.0M
144.9M
165.8M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.01%
0.37%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.46T
3.861T
188.4G
99.11G
62.88G
20.17G
12.87G
4.937G
55.46M
---
0.65%
0.49%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.472G
7.130G
281.3M
124.9M
99.58M
30.20M
20.09M
15.01M
40.90k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.63%
0.03%
0.00%
---
6.537T
357.0G
0.000
---
0.37%
0.17%
0.00%
---
5.397G
2.529G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.24%
0.05%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.510T
521.1G
484.9G
450.6G
218.1G
87.70G
36.41G
---
0.27%
0.04%
0.10%
0.22%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.950G
561.2M
1.407G
3.265G
440.7M
146.0M
73.83M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.16%
---
383.2T
---
36.12%
---
525.5G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
1.031P
---
100.00%
---
1.454T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 357.0G 0.17% 2.529G
IGMP[2]0.00% 40.70M 0.00% 1.178M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 64.65G 0.01% 77.01M
TCP[6]88.06% 908.3T 84.10% 1.223T
UDP[17]9.72% 100.2T 14.04% 204.2G
IPv6[41]0.02% 210.0G 0.03% 370.5M
GRE[47]1.07% 11.07T 0.79% 11.42G
ESP[50]1.07% 11.06T 0.85% 12.31G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.592G 0.00% 38.60M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 127.4G 0.02% 359.3M
Total100.00% 1.031P 100.00% 1.454T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)41.90% 609.5G
Medium (100-1400B)23.38% 340.1G
Large (1401-1500B)34.58% 503.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.14% 2.036G
Total100.00% 1.454T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.30% 993.2T 96.44% 1.403T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.24% 2.476T 0.27% 3.866G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 66.31G 0.02% 255.4M
Other3.46% 35.66T 3.28% 47.71G
Total100.00% 1.031P 100.00% 1.454T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.30% 3.130T 0.16% 2.369G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
19352.03% 20.90T 2.66% 38.74G
164021.48% 15.25T 1.31% 19.02G
600110.74% 7.639T 0.56% 8.212G
30740.68% 7.001T 1.70% 24.66G
82470.44% 4.568T 0.33% 4.787G