Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081027

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081027 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 30.17% of octets and 14.51% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.393M 1 10.05M
5 1.485M 5 10.40M
10 1.599M 12 10.93M
50 3.185M 57 16.99M
90 17.21M 59 47.28M
95 37.73M 59 65.25M
99 96.05M 59 145.8M
99.9 193.4M 59 479.4M
99.99 787.3M 99 1.232G
99.999 1.026G 119 6.656G
100 12.08G 120 7.291G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)1.14% 2.254G
Medium (100-1400B)12.74% 25.16G
Large (1401-1500B)86.05% 169.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.07% 139.2M
Total100.00% 197.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers40.76% 115.1T 40.54% 80.05G 45.89% 4.924M
Encrypted Traffic9.52% 26.90T 10.04% 19.83G 7.19% 772.1k
Advanced Apps3.46% 9.783T 3.46% 6.827G 4.27% 458.7k
File Sharing2.99% 8.458T 2.95% 5.830G 2.23% 239.4k
Misc0.75% 2.125T 0.77% 1.511G 1.09% 116.9k
Measurement0.64% 1.817T 0.65% 1.281G 0.19% 20.00k
Games0.42% 1.200T 0.43% 842.3M 0.46% 49.81k
Audio/Video0.17% 479.7G 0.17% 340.1M 0.31% 32.95k
Unidentified41.28% 116.6T 40.99% 80.95G 38.36% 4.117M
Total100.00% 282.5T 100.00% 197.4G 100.00% 10.73M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
978.6M150012Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
871.9M150022Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
183.5M139615NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
175.2M150010NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
160.9M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
154.3M150013NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
131.6M150011U Notre Dame [693]Abilene [11537]Iperf
112.4M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
103.7M150018NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
101.6M150014Indiana [87]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.067G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]50412 -> 5101
988.6M150024ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]35469 -> 10000
678.2M150010Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]37409 -> 10000
637.3M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]39929 -> 5101
443.8M150021Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]50106 -> 47389
436.1M150012Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63012 -> 50002
400.3M150019JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
356.8M150014Unknown [0]Unknown [0]HTTP
351.8M900053UCAR [194]NCSA [1224]53899 -> 5150
350.0M150060Unknown [36375]Boston U [111]54321 -> 58472

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 826.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers46.76% 438.0T 46.55% 633.4G
Encrypted Traffic5.93% 55.55T 5.91% 80.48G
File Sharing2.83% 26.53T 2.98% 40.57G
Misc2.18% 20.37T 4.37% 59.41G
Advanced Apps2.14% 20.00T 1.65% 22.41G
Audio/Video1.35% 12.65T 1.11% 15.13G
Games0.44% 4.162T 0.69% 9.420G
Measurement0.37% 3.489T 0.45% 6.108G
Unidentified37.99% 355.8T 36.29% 493.8G
Total100.00% 936.6T 100.00% 1.360T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
43.39%
1.32%
1.17%
0.88%
---
406.3T
12.35T
10.99T
8.252T
---
44.09%
0.90%
0.80%
0.76%
---
599.9G
12.18G
10.89G
10.38G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.19%
2.25%
0.48%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.88T
21.05T
4.513T
93.08G
9.297G
---
2.64%
2.80%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
35.86G
38.16G
6.232G
181.3M
40.81M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.13%
0.72%
0.42%
0.42%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.57T
6.781T
3.961T
3.955T
848.9G
261.4G
85.01G
30.39G
19.88G
11.32G
4.896G
1.535G
49.24M
---
1.56%
0.55%
0.27%
0.46%
0.08%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.20G
7.453G
3.617G
6.299G
1.043G
617.5M
127.9M
45.05M
19.48M
138.2M
7.049M
2.265M
194.7k
Misc
Mail
Squid
DNS
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
RTIP
MS Windows
IDENT
SOCKS
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.37%
0.23%
0.23%
0.17%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.84T
2.163T
2.150T
1.627T
502.8G
472.0G
141.1G
88.34G
76.42G
69.22G
60.28G
60.14G
44.22G
32.83G
27.36G
11.60G
2.303G
---
2.10%
0.27%
1.45%
0.14%
0.08%
0.08%
0.02%
0.03%
0.07%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.51G
3.732G
19.71G
1.946G
1.100G
1.044G
214.9M
408.9M
998.7M
501.5M
527.8M
414.0M
90.46M
50.26M
41.08M
92.88M
27.50M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
1.73%
0.26%
0.14%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.17T
2.391T
1.333T
54.07G
42.63G
12.10G
---
1.39%
0.15%
0.08%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
---
18.94G
2.051G
1.150G
63.18M
94.83M
110.2M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.95%
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.890T
3.402T
169.3G
92.33G
50.81G
31.43G
13.37G
7.724G
676.1M
---
0.59%
0.48%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.085G
6.526G
246.7M
120.9M
73.63M
40.05M
22.96M
15.62M
498.6k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.25%
0.07%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.306T
663.5G
472.7G
432.2G
192.9G
61.82G
32.90G
---
0.26%
0.06%
0.10%
0.23%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
3.560G
755.6M
1.363G
3.155G
386.3M
125.1M
73.12M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.33%
0.04%
0.00%
---
3.122T
367.4G
0.000
---
0.27%
0.18%
0.00%
---
3.656G
2.452G
0.000
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
37.99%
---
355.8T
---
36.29%
---
493.8G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
936.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.360T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 367.4G 0.18% 2.452G
IGMP[2]0.00% 97.58M 0.00% 2.914M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 56.57G 0.01% 71.06M
TCP[6]86.01% 805.6T 82.19% 1.118T
UDP[17]9.87% 92.47T 14.58% 198.4G
IPv6[41]0.02% 229.1G 0.03% 392.1M
GRE[47]3.55% 33.27T 2.54% 34.52G
ESP[50]0.48% 4.513T 0.46% 6.232G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 5.189G 0.00% 39.64M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 99.69G 0.02% 226.5M
Total100.00% 936.6T 100.00% 1.360T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.33% 589.6G
Medium (100-1400B)23.32% 317.3G
Large (1401-1500B)32.00% 435.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)1.35% 18.41G
Total100.00% 1.360T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.28% 901.7T 96.44% 1.312T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 2.747T 0.30% 4.044G
EF [DSCP=46]0.02% 146.8G 0.02% 275.1M
Other3.41% 31.95T 3.25% 44.18G
Total100.00% 936.6T 100.00% 1.360T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.22% 2.095T 0.12% 1.677G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164021.68% 15.70T 1.43% 19.52G
19351.35% 12.62T 2.02% 27.48G
30740.59% 5.507T 1.52% 20.70G
600110.56% 5.287T 0.41% 5.531G
150000.45% 4.190T 0.42% 5.675G