Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20081006

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20081006 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 31.90% of octets and 15.38% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 1 10.05M
5 1.476M 8 10.37M
10 1.577M 16 10.91M
50 2.875M 57 16.61M
90 12.67M 59 42.89M
95 23.12M 59 62.85M
99 82.30M 59 144.7M
99.9 204.4M 59 446.5M
99.99 891.2M 112 1.689G
99.999 1.056G 119 6.807G
100 11.32G 119 38.24G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.84% 1.721G
Medium (100-1400B)10.56% 21.59G
Large (1401-1500B)88.51% 181.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 177.2M
Total100.00% 204.4G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.41% 101.8T 34.59% 70.73G 38.12% 4.436M
Encrypted Traffic7.08% 20.94T 7.19% 14.70G 5.50% 639.5k
Advanced Apps4.87% 14.40T 4.86% 9.936G 6.02% 700.7k
File Sharing3.23% 9.567T 3.21% 6.554G 2.15% 249.8k
Measurement1.84% 5.454T 1.96% 4.004G 0.30% 35.34k
Misc0.63% 1.871T 0.66% 1.354G 0.90% 104.9k
Games0.43% 1.268T 0.43% 883.8M 0.45% 52.37k
Audio/Video0.16% 472.7G 0.16% 333.2M 0.28% 32.84k
Unidentified47.35% 140.1T 46.94% 95.98G 46.27% 5.384M
Total100.00% 295.9T 100.00% 204.4G 100.00% 11.63M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.356G900022DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
4.639G900050INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
991.8M150020Unknown [32361]Abilene [11537]Iperf
812.5M150019Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
744.9M150010UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]Iperf
656.2M150011Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]Iperf
603.1M150010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Unknown [32361]Iperf
505.6M150010Merit [237]Unknown [32361]Iperf
416.0M150010Unknown [32361]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
404.5M150017Unknown [32361]Merit [237]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.053G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]39049 -> 5101
972.9M150059ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]33942 -> 10000
964.1M150012Unknown [0]APAN-JP [7660]Shoutcast
813.1M150056U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]936 -> 988
625.7M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]40149 -> 5101
396.9M150013Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]39271 -> 50021
377.2M150012MIT [3]Drexel U [11834]HTTP
375.6M150023JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
331.2M150013LATECH [19564]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]50005 -> 42677
318.9M150018Nat Lib Med [70]Cornell [26]Audiogalaxy

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 933.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers45.07% 418.1T 45.65% 606.9G
Encrypted Traffic5.41% 50.23T 5.68% 75.58G
File Sharing2.82% 26.21T 2.78% 36.91G
Advanced Apps2.61% 24.25T 1.95% 25.92G
Misc2.20% 20.38T 4.34% 57.65G
Audio/Video1.16% 10.76T 0.97% 12.87G
Measurement0.78% 7.218T 0.70% 9.313G
Games0.48% 4.449T 0.75% 9.913G
Unidentified39.47% 366.2T 37.19% 494.4G
Total100.00% 927.9T 100.00% 1.329T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
FTP
Rsync
NNTP
---
41.59%
1.26%
1.13%
1.09%
---
385.9T
11.65T
10.46T
10.14T
---
42.89%
0.96%
0.86%
0.94%
---
570.2G
12.77G
11.49G
12.46G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.53%
2.18%
0.69%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.46T
20.27T
6.380T
97.32G
10.80G
---
2.14%
2.91%
0.62%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.40G
38.69G
8.264G
178.2M
42.12M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.03%
0.78%
0.46%
0.44%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.511T
7.194T
4.235T
4.107T
755.3G
269.7G
78.12G
38.54G
9.937G
6.661G
3.248G
2.998G
111.4M
---
1.23%
0.62%
0.29%
0.49%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
16.38G
8.223G
3.911G
6.520G
918.5M
636.3M
117.9M
57.10M
125.1M
11.54M
5.622M
5.149M
172.3k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
IBP
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.34%
0.15%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.73T
1.402T
803.4G
251.3G
49.54G
14.62G
---
1.76%
0.09%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
23.46G
1.181G
774.9M
263.0M
111.6M
134.9M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
IRC
Telnet
NFS
RTIP
NTP
MS Windows
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.28%
0.27%
0.23%
0.23%
0.07%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.91T
2.548T
2.163T
2.129T
676.5G
354.9G
109.1G
104.9G
89.44G
80.82G
75.77G
51.13G
38.14G
26.31G
12.07G
11.60G
1.004G
---
2.17%
0.19%
1.25%
0.28%
0.10%
0.07%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.05%
0.07%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.82G
2.540G
16.56G
3.720G
1.275G
915.0M
793.1M
581.9M
143.4M
690.1M
989.1M
338.5M
46.56M
58.20M
95.79M
66.78M
9.150M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.74%
0.38%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.898T
3.520T
171.2G
83.27G
49.77G
24.17G
10.32G
4.565G
2.284G
---
0.43%
0.50%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.694G
6.698G
245.1M
108.6M
72.29M
31.30M
15.08M
11.50M
1.684M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.74%
0.03%
0.00%
---
6.896T
321.9G
14.80k
---
0.51%
0.19%
0.00%
---
6.788G
2.525G
100.0
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.24%
0.08%
0.07%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.261T
711.1G
680.1G
500.9G
205.4G
59.46G
30.24G
---
0.26%
0.12%
0.06%
0.27%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.502G
1.559G
733.9M
3.532G
421.0M
102.7M
61.70M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.47%
---
366.2T
---
37.19%
---
494.4G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
927.9T
---
100.00%
---
1.329T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 321.9G 0.19% 2.525G
IGMP[2]0.00% 39.38M 0.00% 1.073M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.01% 108.4G 0.01% 130.6M
TCP[6]89.04% 826.2T 85.00% 1.130T
UDP[17]9.29% 86.19T 13.46% 179.0G
IPv6[41]0.02% 169.8G 0.02% 286.9M
GRE[47]0.91% 8.418T 0.67% 8.943G
ESP[50]0.69% 6.380T 0.62% 8.264G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.538G 0.00% 37.90M
IPMP[169]0.00% 14.80k 0.00% 100.0
Other0.01% 99.79G 0.01% 187.3M
Total100.00% 927.9T 100.00% 1.329T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.99% 571.5G
Medium (100-1400B)22.54% 299.6G
Large (1401-1500B)34.34% 456.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.13% 1.759G
Total100.00% 1.329T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]97.11% 901.0T 96.92% 1.288T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.24% 2.199T 0.27% 3.548G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 42.82G 0.01% 172.9M
Other2.65% 24.61T 2.80% 37.25G
Total100.00% 927.9T 100.00% 1.329T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.56% 5.199T 0.28% 3.767G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164021.60% 14.87T 1.40% 18.63G
19351.36% 12.63T 1.99% 26.40G
600110.76% 7.060T 0.57% 7.533G
21280.61% 5.642T 0.74% 9.897G
200000.55% 5.104T 0.29% 3.884G