Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080929

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080929 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 31.08% of octets and 14.81% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 1 10.05M
5 1.477M 8 10.37M
10 1.579M 15 10.87M
50 2.968M 57 16.78M
90 13.78M 59 46.80M
95 24.91M 59 69.56M
99 81.27M 59 163.8M
99.9 184.1M 59 418.0M
99.99 736.2M 59 1.188G
99.999 1.076G 60 2.934G
100 6.109G 119 30.14G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.85% 1.718G
Medium (100-1400B)10.59% 21.30G
Large (1401-1500B)88.47% 177.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 175.8M
Total100.00% 201.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.69% 95.01T 32.85% 66.08G 37.09% 4.096M
Encrypted Traffic7.41% 21.54T 7.53% 15.14G 5.29% 584.0k
Advanced Apps4.31% 12.52T 4.33% 8.716G 5.17% 571.0k
File Sharing3.05% 8.879T 3.04% 6.113G 2.36% 260.9k
Measurement1.82% 5.299T 1.97% 3.970G 0.37% 41.16k
Misc0.64% 1.860T 0.65% 1.317G 0.95% 105.4k
Games0.41% 1.188T 0.41% 832.1M 0.45% 50.01k
Audio/Video0.14% 398.1G 0.14% 281.4M 0.26% 28.55k
Unidentified49.53% 143.9T 49.07% 98.73G 48.06% 5.308M
Total100.00% 290.7T 100.00% 201.1G 100.00% 11.04M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.804G900011DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
4.901G900019INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
818.3M150011UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]Iperf
758.8M150023Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
736.2M150010Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]Iperf
618.2M150010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Unknown [32361]Iperf
613.8M150010Unknown [32361]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
569.3M150010Merit [237]Unknown [32361]Iperf
415.9M150010Unknown [32361]Merit [237]Iperf
402.7M150026Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.074G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]46201 -> 5101
629.2M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52392 -> 5101
564.9M150059ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]33332 -> 10000
546.1M150011Unknown [0]APAN-JP [7660]Shoutcast
473.5M150012Unknown [36375]Boston U [111]54321 -> 58346
376.6M150012JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
354.4M150015Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]58734 -> 50002
350.9M147617Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Universiy of California, San Diego CA [7377]HTTP
288.0M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Unknown [0]Rsync
279.5M150017Unknown [0]Unknown [0]HTTP

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 882.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.28% 414.1T 44.63% 606.2G
Encrypted Traffic6.22% 58.19T 6.11% 82.99G
File Sharing2.83% 26.51T 3.03% 41.16G
Advanced Apps2.28% 21.29T 1.74% 23.58G
Misc2.14% 19.97T 4.07% 55.34G
Audio/Video1.02% 9.520T 0.99% 13.39G
Measurement0.80% 7.477T 0.73% 9.954G
Games0.43% 3.980T 0.69% 9.435G
Unidentified40.00% 374.1T 38.00% 516.1G
Total100.00% 935.2T 100.00% 1.358T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
41.29%
1.12%
1.03%
0.84%
---
386.1T
10.47T
9.644T
7.872T
---
42.28%
0.81%
0.89%
0.65%
---
574.2G
11.02G
12.12G
8.771G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
2.56%
2.10%
1.55%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.97T
19.61T
14.51T
81.01G
8.069G
---
2.14%
2.77%
1.19%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.04G
37.62G
16.10G
188.2M
39.12M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.09%
0.81%
0.43%
0.39%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.18T
7.555T
3.991T
3.686T
701.6G
271.5G
79.88G
22.96G
10.39G
7.040G
2.647G
836.7M
178.5M
---
1.56%
0.65%
0.27%
0.43%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
21.12G
8.777G
3.675G
5.826G
839.3M
608.2M
120.8M
36.37M
131.0M
14.92M
4.857M
1.602M
198.8k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.05%
0.16%
0.03%
0.03%
0.00%
0.00%
---
19.19T
1.537T
276.2G
245.3G
33.79G
10.56G
---
1.59%
0.09%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.56G
1.289G
274.9M
278.5M
70.76M
112.5M
Misc
Mail
Squid
Port 0
DNS
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
NTP
RTIP
Telnet
MS Windows
AOL AIM
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.24%
0.26%
0.24%
0.23%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.60T
2.455T
2.265T
2.179T
497.0G
305.4G
172.9G
98.85G
78.68G
75.84G
56.41G
55.69G
50.53G
47.44G
12.20G
10.05G
1.147G
---
2.05%
0.28%
0.19%
1.15%
0.09%
0.06%
0.02%
0.04%
0.08%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
27.89G
3.828G
2.526G
15.57G
1.190G
790.8M
255.2M
504.6M
1.028G
649.4M
476.3M
320.2M
63.07M
79.01M
96.46M
58.58M
4.294M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.59%
0.39%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.540T
3.625T
169.3G
92.92G
56.77G
22.08G
8.124G
4.491G
471.4M
---
0.36%
0.59%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.834G
8.050G
254.6M
119.0M
80.53M
31.99M
14.36M
10.25M
347.7k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.75%
0.05%
0.00%
---
7.031T
445.5G
0.000
---
0.53%
0.20%
0.00%
---
7.180G
2.774G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.05%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.217T
587.9G
463.1G
419.8G
186.8G
78.21G
27.18G
---
0.26%
0.05%
0.26%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
3.469G
654.6M
3.492G
1.211G
413.4M
140.5M
53.32M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
40.00%
---
374.1T
---
38.00%
---
516.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
935.2T
---
100.00%
---
1.358T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.05% 445.5G 0.20% 2.774G
IGMP[2]0.00% 35.48M 0.00% 898.2k
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 140.2G 0.01% 156.7M
TCP[6]87.57% 819.0T 83.21% 1.130T
UDP[17]9.59% 89.73T 14.49% 196.7G
IPv6[41]0.02% 148.5G 0.02% 267.9M
GRE[47]1.19% 11.16T 0.87% 11.76G
ESP[50]1.55% 14.51T 1.19% 16.10G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.993G 0.00% 46.66M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 81.22G 0.01% 189.0M
Total100.00% 935.2T 100.00% 1.358T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.36% 588.9G
Medium (100-1400B)22.70% 308.2G
Large (1401-1500B)33.76% 458.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.18% 2.383G
Total100.00% 1.358T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.63% 903.7T 96.50% 1.310T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.28% 2.617T 0.29% 3.924G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 73.19G 0.01% 199.9M
Other3.08% 28.81T 3.20% 43.43G
Total100.00% 935.2T 100.00% 1.358T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.65% 6.069T 0.32% 4.337G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164021.88% 17.56T 1.61% 21.93G
19351.33% 12.46T 1.86% 25.29G
600111.03% 9.628T 0.75% 10.19G
200000.72% 6.728T 0.37% 5.071G
330010.69% 6.451T 0.32% 4.358G