Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080922

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080922 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 32.84% of octets and 15.82% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 0 10.05M
5 1.475M 6 10.36M
10 1.576M 14 10.80M
50 3.070M 57 16.80M
90 15.21M 59 47.57M
95 31.86M 59 68.55M
99 111.5M 59 157.2M
99.9 180.2M 59 576.9M
99.99 644.7M 59 1.062G
99.999 1.066G 120 2.021G
100 19.08G 123 38.03G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.84% 1.778G
Medium (100-1400B)9.77% 20.70G
Large (1401-1500B)89.27% 189.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.12% 249.7M
Total100.00% 211.8G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.18% 98.72T 32.39% 68.62G 36.44% 4.184M
Encrypted Traffic8.91% 27.33T 9.05% 19.17G 6.03% 692.2k
Advanced Apps4.48% 13.73T 4.51% 9.564G 5.20% 596.7k
File Sharing3.23% 9.909T 3.21% 6.793G 2.57% 294.9k
Measurement2.10% 6.451T 1.87% 3.965G 1.08% 124.3k
Misc0.58% 1.764T 0.60% 1.267G 0.89% 102.2k
Games0.43% 1.320T 0.44% 925.2M 0.45% 51.33k
Audio/Video0.16% 499.3G 0.17% 353.7M 0.32% 36.34k
Unidentified47.94% 147.0T 47.77% 101.2G 47.03% 5.401M
Total100.00% 306.8T 100.00% 211.8G 100.00% 11.48M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.459G848319INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
6.408G900020INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
5.984G900014DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
5.471G900029DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Abilene [11537]Iperf
807.6M150010UNL [7896]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]Iperf
754.9M150010UNL [7896]Unknown [32361]Iperf
656.0M150010Unknown [32361]UNL [7896]Iperf
595.0M150010BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Unknown [32361]Iperf
553.9M150010Unknown [32361]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]Iperf
504.7M150010Merit [237]Unknown [32361]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
5.493G900033INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]36560 -> 5010
2.186G900026DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]50033 -> 5010
1.055G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]53040 -> 5101
916.7M900010Abilene [11537]Abilene [11537]32964 -> 5101
786.0M150060U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
645.1M150033INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]988 -> 1022
628.4M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]35865 -> 5101
410.7M150011JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
373.6M150027Unknown [36375]Boston U [111]54321 -> 58073
337.1M150015Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63002 -> 50019

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 910.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.17% 412.7T 45.03% 603.0G
Encrypted Traffic6.92% 64.64T 6.62% 88.68G
File Sharing2.59% 24.18T 2.64% 35.30G
Advanced Apps2.41% 22.52T 1.87% 25.08G
Misc2.32% 21.69T 5.00% 67.01G
Audio/Video0.94% 8.819T 0.99% 13.29G
Measurement0.87% 8.095T 0.71% 9.531G
Games0.43% 4.006T 0.68% 9.159G
Unidentified39.34% 367.5T 36.45% 488.1G
Total100.00% 934.2T 100.00% 1.339T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
41.20%
1.05%
1.04%
0.88%
---
384.9T
9.828T
9.677T
8.236T
---
42.68%
0.79%
0.89%
0.67%
---
571.5G
10.52G
11.94G
8.958G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.15%
2.14%
1.62%
0.01%
0.00%
---
29.46T
19.99T
15.09T
84.09G
7.816G
---
2.54%
2.81%
1.27%
0.01%
0.00%
---
33.96G
37.57G
16.95G
153.6M
37.52M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
0.95%
0.70%
0.42%
0.39%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.908T
6.516T
3.901T
3.607T
815.9G
306.9G
85.59G
25.69G
10.51G
6.520G
2.705G
341.0M
10.28M
---
0.72%
1.03%
0.27%
0.47%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.596G
13.79G
3.591G
6.337G
990.1M
678.3M
129.5M
34.66M
134.6M
11.90M
3.779M
705.4k
63.20k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
IBP
BBFTP
---
2.17%
0.18%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.31T
1.682T
437.1G
50.46G
32.95G
14.06G
---
1.71%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
---
22.88G
1.521G
387.7M
125.1M
55.92M
114.9M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
AFS
X11
NFS
IRC
RTIP
NTP
MS Windows
Telnet
AOL AIM
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.21%
0.49%
0.27%
0.18%
0.05%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
11.33T
4.573T
2.554T
1.695T
492.5G
449.4G
156.3G
94.50G
78.21G
71.79G
48.61G
45.11G
39.84G
28.26G
23.01G
11.68G
274.5M
---
2.05%
0.36%
1.95%
0.22%
0.10%
0.07%
0.02%
0.03%
0.05%
0.07%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.50G
4.757G
26.12G
2.998G
1.287G
985.6M
229.4M
412.5M
697.4M
939.3M
322.3M
483.4M
55.36M
62.67M
67.41M
93.86M
3.018M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.51%
0.40%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.720T
3.741T
167.8G
86.00G
67.00G
23.01G
12.25G
2.289G
131.6M
---
0.31%
0.65%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.141G
8.652G
239.1M
111.6M
90.96M
32.56M
18.67M
6.337M
97.10k
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.83%
0.04%
0.00%
---
7.756T
338.3G
5.100M
---
0.49%
0.22%
0.00%
---
6.555G
2.975G
3.400k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.24%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.261T
704.2G
417.0G
329.0G
178.0G
87.09G
28.75G
---
0.26%
0.06%
0.24%
0.08%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
3.473G
745.9M
3.200G
1.091G
380.8M
208.2M
58.74M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.34%
---
367.5T
---
36.45%
---
488.1G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
934.2T
---
100.00%
---
1.339T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 338.3G 0.22% 2.975G
IGMP[2]0.00% 47.77M 0.00% 961.9k
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 164.1G 0.01% 171.2M
TCP[6]88.42% 826.0T 83.94% 1.124T
UDP[17]9.25% 86.45T 14.03% 187.8G
IPv6[41]0.01% 110.5G 0.02% 225.0M
GRE[47]0.64% 5.966T 0.50% 6.714G
ESP[50]1.62% 15.09T 1.27% 16.95G
AX.25[93]0.00% 3.776M 0.00% 2.900k
PIM[103]0.00% 5.308G 0.00% 49.37M
IPMP[169]0.00% 5.100M 0.00% 3.400k
Other0.01% 85.43G 0.01% 155.0M
Total100.00% 934.2T 100.00% 1.339T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)43.00% 575.8G
Medium (100-1400B)22.20% 297.3G
Large (1401-1500B)34.73% 465.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 1.018G
Total100.00% 1.339T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.94% 896.3T 96.28% 1.289T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.25% 2.361T 0.28% 3.724G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 49.10G 0.02% 220.8M
Other3.81% 35.54T 3.42% 45.85G
Total100.00% 934.2T 100.00% 1.339T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.46% 4.298T 0.23% 3.113G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164022.00% 18.71T 1.75% 23.46G
19351.21% 11.31T 1.78% 23.81G
600110.97% 9.047T 0.71% 9.516G
330010.63% 5.926T 0.30% 4.000G
21280.58% 5.397T 0.59% 7.942G