Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080908

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080908 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 35.69% of octets and 17.24% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.396M 1 10.06M
5 1.498M 7 10.50M
10 1.624M 14 11.04M
50 3.294M 58 17.85M
90 14.69M 59 49.05M
95 25.57M 59 73.20M
99 89.63M 59 178.0M
99.9 215.6M 59 734.4M
99.99 870.0M 115 1.986G
99.999 2.282G 119 5.542G
100 46.91G 119 43.25G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.64% 1.270G
Medium (100-1400B)10.12% 20.05G
Large (1401-1500B)89.02% 176.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.21% 416.9M
Total100.00% 198.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers32.27% 93.34T 32.80% 64.97G 39.10% 3.928M
Encrypted Traffic9.04% 26.15T 9.21% 18.24G 7.07% 710.8k
Advanced Apps4.84% 14.00T 4.91% 9.717G 5.52% 554.6k
Measurement3.06% 8.843T 2.64% 5.222G 2.46% 247.5k
File Sharing2.87% 8.288T 2.88% 5.696G 2.08% 209.1k
Games0.85% 2.455T 0.86% 1.700G 0.95% 95.66k
Misc0.49% 1.430T 0.51% 1.011G 0.79% 79.16k
Audio/Video0.15% 425.8G 0.15% 299.6M 0.30% 30.49k
Unidentified46.44% 134.3T 46.05% 91.23G 41.72% 4.191M
Total100.00% 289.2T 100.00% 198.1G 100.00% 10.04M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
6.378G900054DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Abilene [11537]Iperf
3.708G900025DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
2.986G900050INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.857G900017INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
970.7M150050ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]Iperf
532.6M900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Iperf
474.6M150023Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]Iperf
180.1M139716NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
164.5M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
126.4M150014NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.060G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]55257 -> 5101
713.8M149911U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1022 -> 988
623.8M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]49651 -> 5101
500.6M897518DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
457.2M150052Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]39818 -> 10000
405.8M150011JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
338.1M150015Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63040 -> 50002
327.4M150022LATECH [19564]Fermi National Accelerator Lab [3152]50002 -> 54635
320.9M149951COMMERCEONE [13371]BWI-GIGA-POP [10886]HTTP
318.4M150023Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]Indiana [87]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 795.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers44.16% 358.0T 44.76% 514.3G
Encrypted Traffic6.29% 51.01T 5.95% 68.41G
File Sharing3.06% 24.81T 2.85% 32.79G
Advanced Apps2.48% 20.07T 2.02% 23.26G
Misc2.30% 18.66T 4.67% 53.71G
Measurement1.42% 11.54T 1.00% 11.51G
Audio/Video1.04% 8.391T 0.96% 11.07G
Games0.68% 5.524T 0.85% 9.807G
Unidentified38.56% 312.5T 36.91% 424.2G
Total100.00% 810.6T 100.00% 1.149T

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
40.00%
1.70%
1.29%
1.17%
---
324.2T
13.81T
10.43T
9.479T
---
41.55%
1.22%
1.03%
0.96%
---
477.4G
13.99G
11.87G
10.99G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.50%
2.00%
0.78%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.39T
16.20T
6.320T
86.38G
6.872G
---
2.64%
2.60%
0.70%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.35G
29.86G
8.004G
166.3M
32.11M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.33%
0.75%
0.49%
0.37%
0.08%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.77T
6.043T
3.997T
2.964T
647.8G
230.0G
94.57G
48.30G
9.336G
5.991G
1.876G
528.7M
28.51M
---
1.38%
0.58%
0.32%
0.42%
0.07%
0.05%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.85G
6.665G
3.635G
4.872G
814.3M
629.6M
131.1M
59.60M
119.5M
8.428M
2.476M
812.6k
113.8k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.25%
0.19%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.21T
1.536T
213.4G
48.02G
47.72G
12.33G
---
1.87%
0.12%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.45G
1.340G
171.4M
58.36M
118.2M
121.9M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
RTIP
MS Windows
SOCKS
AOL AIM
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
1.17%
0.46%
0.26%
0.24%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.484T
3.689T
2.102T
1.940T
479.6G
373.1G
186.9G
82.05G
67.48G
58.86G
54.09G
41.81G
34.78G
29.76G
26.55G
11.04G
316.7M
---
2.14%
0.33%
1.48%
0.28%
0.10%
0.07%
0.02%
0.03%
0.08%
0.04%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
24.55G
3.755G
17.04G
3.238G
1.145G
854.0M
270.6M
390.8M
883.6M
515.7M
480.7M
308.2M
64.24M
38.18M
84.62M
87.54M
2.820M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.37%
0.06%
0.00%
---
11.06T
478.9G
0.000
---
0.71%
0.29%
0.00%
---
8.128G
3.389G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
0.59%
0.41%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.773T
3.312T
147.7G
69.39G
54.87G
18.49G
9.545G
4.875G
0.000
---
0.35%
0.57%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
4.068G
6.552G
229.0M
99.61M
75.77M
26.09M
14.05M
13.28M
0.000
Games
Spy Arcade
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.29%
0.26%
0.06%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.328T
2.112T
479.1G
385.2G
132.8G
54.00G
32.96G
---
0.20%
0.27%
0.10%
0.24%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
---
2.296G
3.147G
1.098G
2.800G
313.2M
92.53M
58.70M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.56%
---
312.5T
---
36.91%
---
424.2G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
810.6T
---
100.00%
---
1.149T

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.06% 478.9G 0.29% 3.389G
IGMP[2]0.00% 35.61M 0.00% 927.8k
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 197.7G 0.02% 206.5M
TCP[6]88.11% 714.2T 83.56% 960.1G
UDP[17]10.17% 82.42T 14.78% 169.8G
IPv6[41]0.01% 98.78G 0.02% 190.3M
GRE[47]0.84% 6.779T 0.62% 7.163G
ESP[50]0.78% 6.320T 0.70% 8.004G
AX.25[93]0.00% 26.40k 0.00% 400.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.902G 0.00% 48.25M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 86.45G 0.01% 166.9M
Total100.00% 810.6T 100.00% 1.149T

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)42.86% 492.5G
Medium (100-1400B)22.31% 256.3G
Large (1401-1500B)34.73% 399.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 1.206G
Total100.00% 1.149T

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.83% 776.7T 96.06% 1.103T
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.29% 2.342T 0.31% 3.529G
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 43.18G 0.02% 177.9M
Other3.88% 31.45T 3.62% 41.59G
Total100.00% 810.6T 100.00% 1.149T

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.40% 3.228T 0.21% 2.428G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
164022.57% 20.85T 2.22% 25.55G
600111.60% 12.96T 1.21% 13.91G
9881.20% 9.748T 0.62% 7.092G
21280.92% 7.474T 0.80% 9.181G
19350.91% 7.374T 1.36% 15.57G