Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080901

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080901 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, data for the following day(s) were missing: Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. We multiplied all nominal quantities by 7/2 to estimate the amounts of various types of traffic. Percentages and distributions were not modified.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 36.79% of octets and 18.85% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 1 10.05M
5 1.489M 6 10.50M
10 1.619M 13 10.95M
50 3.526M 58 18.03M
90 14.53M 59 48.15M
95 27.83M 59 66.74M
99 96.06M 59 138.9M
99.9 154.4M 59 442.2M
99.99 437.0M 59 900.9M
99.999 1.007G 60 1.279G
100 1.037G 63 1.609G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.68% 1.229G
Medium (100-1400B)11.52% 20.86G
Large (1401-1500B)87.74% 158.9G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.06% 110.0M
Total100.00% 181.1G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers34.78% 91.15T 35.20% 63.76G 38.59% 3.778M
Encrypted Traffic7.86% 20.61T 7.94% 14.37G 5.88% 576.1k
Advanced Apps5.37% 14.07T 5.38% 9.746G 5.92% 579.8k
Measurement3.17% 8.317T 3.07% 5.568G 3.13% 306.0k
File Sharing2.88% 7.537T 2.89% 5.227G 1.98% 193.9k
Games1.18% 3.099T 1.20% 2.174G 1.23% 120.3k
Misc0.60% 1.563T 0.63% 1.146G 0.84% 82.67k
Audio/Video0.16% 421.0G 0.16% 295.9M 0.31% 29.90k
Unidentified44.00% 115.3T 43.52% 78.82G 42.12% 4.124M
Total100.00% 262.1T 100.00% 181.1G 100.00% 9.792M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
170.3M139429NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
116.1M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
101.1M149612Indiana [87]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
96.81M140829NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
94.71M150030TRANSPAC [22388]Indiana [87]Iperf
89.98M150030NASA Internet [297]SLAC [3671]Iperf
79.99M150029NASA Internet [297]Unknown [25689]Iperf
61.27M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
60.23M150059PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [9270]PUNET Technology Ltd.,Taiwan [10052]Iperf
59.58M150030NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.037G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]49600 -> 5101
599.9M900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]43298 -> 5101
341.7M150030JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline
249.4M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
238.6M150027Unknown [25776]LATECH [19564]63001 -> 50003
236.2M147616NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]UCAR [194]Hotline
216.1M149914Unknown [0]Indiana [87]HTTP
214.6M150060Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]NIST-BOULDER [2648]Rsync
209.0M150028UNIVHAWAII [6360]FR [2200]872 -> 59062
204.1M142013Nat Lib Med [70]Unknown [40127]50299 -> 35889

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 756.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers43.53% 310.1T 41.90% 402.6G
Encrypted Traffic5.34% 38.04T 5.18% 49.82G
File Sharing3.12% 22.24T 3.01% 28.87G
Advanced Apps2.89% 20.57T 2.50% 24.06G
Misc1.88% 13.41T 4.41% 42.42G
Measurement1.48% 10.56T 1.11% 10.67G
Audio/Video1.44% 10.28T 1.06% 10.14G
Games0.84% 6.001T 1.11% 10.70G
Unidentified39.47% 281.1T 39.72% 381.6G
Total100.00% 712.4T 100.00% 961.0G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
38.53%
1.91%
1.74%
1.35%
---
274.5T
13.57T
12.42T
9.623T
---
37.73%
1.52%
1.48%
1.16%
---
362.6G
14.58G
14.21G
11.18G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.26%
1.64%
0.43%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.20T
11.69T
3.079T
64.08G
5.541G
---
2.66%
2.06%
0.45%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.58G
19.75G
4.311G
132.5M
30.41M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.37%
0.70%
0.59%
0.33%
0.09%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.760T
5.022T
4.171T
2.326T
647.2G
220.8G
52.97G
27.01G
11.05G
3.940G
2.246G
802.6M
6.216M
---
1.46%
0.60%
0.39%
0.38%
0.08%
0.06%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
14.02G
5.782G
3.781G
3.614G
804.6M
614.9M
73.57M
30.17M
140.7M
6.044M
3.455M
2.852M
55.30k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
IBP
---
2.66%
0.19%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.96T
1.364T
179.2G
53.44G
13.36G
429.2M
---
2.34%
0.12%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
22.45G
1.184G
181.2M
124.4M
115.4M
2.162M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
AFS
NFS
NTP
IRC
Telnet
RTIP
SOCKS
MS Windows
IDENT
AOL AIM
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
---
0.88%
0.31%
0.24%
0.22%
0.10%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.304T
2.200T
1.740T
1.590T
741.9G
309.0G
159.0G
64.49G
63.51G
60.79G
42.77G
40.37G
39.26G
26.97G
13.58G
12.31G
591.3M
---
2.00%
0.23%
1.39%
0.28%
0.14%
0.07%
0.02%
0.09%
0.03%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.05%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.19G
2.166G
13.35G
2.692G
1.355G
673.9M
223.0M
843.4M
311.1M
537.8M
371.3M
71.95M
440.0M
64.52M
17.63M
95.38M
10.44M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.39%
0.33%
0.00%
---
9.885T
2.378T
0.000
---
0.82%
1.02%
0.00%
---
7.881G
9.785G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.07%
0.33%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.650T
2.376T
107.7G
76.10G
41.45G
16.52G
7.414G
5.965G
0.000
---
0.65%
0.36%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.267G
3.493G
161.9M
108.3M
57.09M
26.23M
12.98M
15.99M
0.000
Games
Spy Arcade
DirectX
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Asheron
Starsiege Tribes
---
0.41%
0.28%
0.06%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.924T
2.028T
456.4G
397.0G
108.5G
65.09G
20.74G
---
0.31%
0.31%
0.34%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
2.961G
2.951G
3.311G
1.041G
294.3M
103.5M
41.30M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.47%
---
281.1T
---
39.72%
---
381.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
712.4T
---
100.00%
---
961.0G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.33% 2.378T 1.02% 9.785G
IGMP[2]0.00% 31.27M 0.00% 888.3k
IP-ENCAP[4]0.00% 29.82G 0.00% 32.55M
TCP[6]87.65% 624.5T 82.80% 795.6G
UDP[17]10.76% 76.64T 15.65% 150.4G
IPv6[41]0.01% 76.76G 0.02% 159.8M
GRE[47]1.04% 7.390T 0.77% 7.443G
ESP[50]0.43% 3.079T 0.45% 4.311G
AX.25[93]0.00% 23.10k 0.00% 350.0
PIM[103]0.00% 4.844G 0.01% 51.47M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 64.11G 0.01% 132.9M
Total100.00% 712.4T 100.00% 961.0G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.65% 381.0G
Medium (100-1400B)23.91% 229.7G
Large (1401-1500B)36.39% 349.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.05% 491.2M
Total100.00% 961.0G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.56% 680.8T 95.92% 921.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.31% 2.188T 0.34% 3.232G
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 14.05G 0.01% 72.85M
Other4.13% 29.45T 3.74% 35.94G
Total100.00% 712.4T 100.00% 961.0G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.50% 3.564T 0.28% 2.664G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
600110.80% 5.734T 0.63% 6.070G
164020.76% 5.436T 0.68% 6.556G
19350.27% 1.926T 0.38% 3.611G
21280.23% 1.664T 0.22% 2.091G
30740.16% 1.168T 0.42% 4.041G