Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080818

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080818 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 42.26% of octets and 22.30% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 1 10.05M
5 1.487M 7 10.50M
10 1.607M 14 10.98M
50 3.172M 58 17.55M
90 15.68M 59 48.58M
95 29.61M 59 72.53M
99 93.68M 59 202.4M
99.9 175.9M 59 540.0M
99.99 948.6M 116 1.587G
99.999 1.064G 148 3.686G
100 266.4G 159 9.178G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.47% 954.8M
Medium (100-1400B)9.97% 20.10G
Large (1401-1500B)89.22% 179.8G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.33% 673.2M
Total100.00% 201.6G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers33.13% 98.42T 33.91% 68.38G 39.28% 4.122M
Encrypted Traffic7.18% 21.33T 7.56% 15.25G 6.28% 658.7k
Advanced Apps5.51% 16.36T 5.69% 11.46G 6.43% 674.5k
Measurement5.48% 16.28T 4.53% 9.143G 2.97% 311.5k
File Sharing3.48% 10.32T 3.54% 7.135G 2.52% 264.7k
Misc0.79% 2.352T 0.87% 1.754G 0.88% 92.51k
Games0.48% 1.423T 0.50% 998.2M 0.45% 47.52k
Audio/Video0.15% 433.8G 0.15% 310.2M 0.29% 30.20k
Unidentified43.82% 130.1T 43.24% 87.19G 40.90% 4.291M
Total100.00% 297.1T 100.00% 201.6G 100.00% 10.49M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.575G900011UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.049G900020Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
1.045G900018ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.022G900044Abilene [11537]UNIVHAWAII [6360]Iperf
833.1M150016APAN-JP [7660]Abilene [11537]Iperf
182.0M139415NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
168.3M150019NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
157.9M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
154.2M150020APAN-JP [7660]SURFnet [1103]Iperf
139.2M140330NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.058G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]48304 -> 5101
1.021G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]42879 -> 5101
875.1M150053Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]39873 -> 10000
851.2M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]35579 -> 5101
834.2M150030ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]56665 -> 10000
643.2M900050NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]45504 -> 50000
461.6M900037INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]TACCNET [32093]34076 -> 50001
452.6M149613Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]37653 -> 44815
431.9M150010UNIVHAWAII [6360]Abilene [11537]37145 -> 3002
407.8M150021JPL [127]Oregon State U [4201]Hotline

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 831.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers42.91% 301.7T 43.59% 394.2G
Encrypted Traffic6.06% 42.58T 6.72% 60.78G
File Sharing3.39% 23.82T 3.26% 29.49G
Advanced Apps3.24% 22.76T 2.94% 26.61G
Misc3.17% 22.29T 5.91% 53.44G
Measurement2.70% 18.99T 1.52% 13.74G
Audio/Video1.87% 13.13T 1.54% 13.90G
Games0.45% 3.178T 0.60% 5.390G
Unidentified36.22% 254.6T 33.92% 306.7G
Total100.00% 703.1T 100.00% 904.3G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
38.35%
1.71%
1.44%
1.41%
---
269.6T
12.02T
10.10T
9.948T
---
39.72%
1.30%
1.34%
1.24%
---
359.2G
11.71G
12.16G
11.17G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.38%
2.12%
0.55%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.74T
14.89T
3.847T
83.58G
5.885G
---
3.17%
2.93%
0.60%
0.02%
0.00%
---
28.65G
26.53G
5.399G
164.6M
31.30M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
BitTorrent
Hotline
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.11%
1.01%
0.60%
0.59%
0.06%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.781T
7.067T
4.194T
4.147T
399.1G
110.9G
97.36G
19.71G
4.869G
3.179G
1.883G
895.1M
6.385M
---
1.37%
0.76%
0.60%
0.42%
0.05%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.39G
6.907G
5.389G
3.840G
447.9M
299.1M
126.5M
23.68M
61.35M
5.750M
2.399M
1.622M
28.10k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
2.57%
0.52%
0.11%
0.03%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.06T
3.640T
761.5G
225.8G
44.96G
24.92G
---
2.43%
0.40%
0.07%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
---
21.97G
3.596G
600.1M
250.1M
141.4M
54.84M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
NFS
X11
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
RPC Portmapper
AOL AIM
---
1.45%
0.91%
0.29%
0.22%
0.14%
0.07%
0.04%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
10.17T
6.380T
2.070T
1.524T
1.007T
480.2G
297.5G
109.7G
55.50G
55.34G
48.21G
40.33G
22.56G
12.85G
11.70G
5.470G
4.924G
---
2.80%
0.56%
1.72%
0.31%
0.09%
0.11%
0.06%
0.04%
0.08%
0.06%
0.02%
0.03%
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
25.34G
5.083G
15.52G
2.770G
856.1M
995.4M
573.5M
358.2M
725.3M
508.3M
180.7M
309.3M
41.37M
63.71M
91.64M
7.579M
9.222M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
2.67%
0.03%
0.00%
---
18.77T
213.7G
0.000
---
1.31%
0.21%
0.00%
---
11.81G
1.935G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.34%
0.48%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.426T
3.403T
170.9G
57.69G
45.36G
18.98G
8.106G
3.644G
50.98M
---
0.86%
0.63%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.768G
5.723G
232.8M
68.50M
67.13M
21.75M
13.08M
9.140M
37.60k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Battlenet
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.18%
0.17%
0.05%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.274T
1.216T
350.1G
195.6G
109.6G
18.47G
12.92G
---
0.21%
0.13%
0.18%
0.05%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.877G
1.160G
1.614G
495.8M
192.1M
25.62M
24.09M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
36.22%
---
254.6T
---
33.92%
---
306.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
703.1T
---
100.00%
---
904.3G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.03% 213.7G 0.21% 1.935G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.85M 0.00% 1.209M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 171.8G 0.03% 231.4M
TCP[6]89.77% 631.2T 86.22% 779.7G
UDP[17]9.18% 64.52T 12.52% 113.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 26.93G 0.01% 61.71M
GRE[47]0.42% 2.984T 0.39% 3.528G
ESP[50]0.55% 3.847T 0.60% 5.399G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 4.496G 0.01% 47.46M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.02% 121.7G 0.02% 191.9M
Total100.00% 703.1T 100.00% 904.3G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.51% 357.3G
Medium (100-1400B)20.78% 187.8G
Large (1401-1500B)39.60% 358.1G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.11% 996.7M
Total100.00% 904.3G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.82% 673.7T 96.56% 873.3G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.03% 245.8G 0.06% 530.7M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 50.33G 0.02% 152.4M
Other4.13% 29.07T 3.36% 30.40G
Total100.00% 703.1T 100.00% 904.3G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.45% 3.145T 0.25% 2.297G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
500002.00% 14.08T 2.31% 20.86G
168000.80% 5.608T 0.94% 8.538G
21280.74% 5.178T 0.73% 6.644G
19350.61% 4.289T 0.95% 8.630G
330010.59% 4.124T 0.31% 2.781G