Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080811

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080811 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 41.61% of octets and 22.39% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 1 10.07M
5 1.485M 6 10.50M
10 1.601M 13 10.96M
50 3.083M 58 17.40M
90 15.44M 59 48.60M
95 29.79M 59 73.80M
99 96.07M 59 166.7M
99.9 181.8M 59 430.5M
99.99 954.2M 59 1.622G
99.999 1.042G 119 3.692G
100 187.2G 121 7.319G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.43% 799.7M
Medium (100-1400B)8.84% 16.58G
Large (1401-1500B)90.42% 169.5G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.31% 586.7M
Total100.00% 187.5G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers31.24% 86.14T 32.05% 60.09G 34.42% 3.455M
Encrypted Traffic9.32% 25.70T 9.60% 18.00G 6.67% 669.6k
Measurement6.46% 17.80T 5.49% 10.29G 3.25% 326.4k
Advanced Apps6.04% 16.66T 6.22% 11.65G 6.65% 667.1k
File Sharing3.98% 10.98T 4.01% 7.520G 2.72% 273.4k
Misc0.72% 1.987T 0.78% 1.461G 0.91% 91.75k
Games0.18% 494.2G 0.18% 346.4M 0.21% 21.24k
Audio/Video0.14% 376.4G 0.14% 266.1M 0.26% 25.96k
Unidentified41.92% 115.5T 41.53% 77.88G 44.90% 4.506M
Total100.00% 275.7T 100.00% 187.5G 100.00% 10.03M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.121G900016ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.052G900011Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
238.6M150023NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]SLAC [3671]Iperf
224.2M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
219.3M150013NASA-AERONET [10343]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
209.7M150020NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]ESNET [3428]Iperf
181.4M139316NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
158.3M150014NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
155.0M149819NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]ESNET [3428]Iperf
140.7M140314NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.050G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]42963 -> 5101
1.047G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]48540 -> 5101
1.003G150011Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]53844 -> 10000
986.9M150025Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]54560 -> 10000
983.4M150044ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]55937 -> 10000
968.0M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]52173 -> 3002
882.9M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]58186 -> 5101
823.7M150041Unknown [32361]Boston U [111]47852 -> 10000
671.6M900013NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]54805 -> 50000
420.1M150023U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 799.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.69% 249.7T 38.37% 321.3G
Encrypted Traffic6.72% 44.50T 7.16% 59.99G
Measurement4.94% 32.73T 2.87% 24.06G
File Sharing3.72% 24.65T 4.04% 33.86G
Advanced Apps3.54% 23.44T 3.28% 27.43G
Misc3.10% 20.53T 6.11% 51.15G
Audio/Video1.66% 10.99T 1.43% 11.94G
Games0.28% 1.834T 0.37% 3.139G
Unidentified38.36% 254.1T 36.37% 304.6G
Total100.00% 662.6T 100.00% 837.6G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
FTP
NNTP
---
33.26%
1.72%
1.39%
1.32%
---
220.3T
11.39T
9.230T
8.748T
---
34.60%
1.34%
1.26%
1.17%
---
289.8G
11.18G
10.56G
9.788G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.26%
1.90%
0.53%
0.01%
0.00%
---
28.25T
12.61T
3.538T
86.88G
5.899G
---
3.81%
2.72%
0.61%
0.02%
0.00%
---
31.90G
22.75G
5.141G
165.2M
33.14M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
4.90%
0.04%
0.00%
---
32.48T
253.3G
0.000
---
2.60%
0.28%
0.00%
---
21.73G
2.325G
0.000
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Carracho
Blubster
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.36%
1.32%
0.64%
0.32%
0.06%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.004T
8.751T
4.233T
2.124T
380.0G
67.41G
56.52G
20.76G
7.585G
2.580G
1.043G
106.2M
6.031M
---
2.18%
0.96%
0.47%
0.34%
0.05%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
18.29G
8.081G
3.928G
2.838G
425.0M
154.9M
81.82M
21.61M
11.98M
30.19M
1.189M
341.8k
25.80k
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
IBP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
---
2.91%
0.52%
0.06%
0.03%
0.02%
0.00%
---
19.25T
3.432T
379.3G
216.3G
139.6G
24.68G
---
2.78%
0.40%
0.04%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
---
23.24G
3.363G
328.0M
246.0M
194.9M
59.74M
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
NFS
X11
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
SNMP
AOL AIM
IDENT
RPC Portmapper
---
1.36%
0.95%
0.30%
0.23%
0.11%
0.06%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.987T
6.314T
2.005T
1.526T
743.3G
400.0G
253.3G
71.33G
67.81G
47.45G
43.83G
37.52G
12.97G
11.92G
7.667G
7.259G
201.6M
---
2.85%
0.59%
1.82%
0.32%
0.08%
0.09%
0.08%
0.04%
0.11%
0.06%
0.02%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
---
23.87G
4.911G
15.24G
2.703G
677.3M
721.0M
632.2M
306.2M
887.9M
489.4M
185.3M
319.3M
36.61M
93.59M
9.436M
53.57M
1.893M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Camarades webcams
Subset of VoIP
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.12%
0.50%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.408T
3.327T
152.1G
43.94G
41.18G
14.26G
7.352G
4.993G
0.000
---
0.73%
0.65%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.089G
5.461G
222.4M
60.29M
57.90M
17.53M
24.47M
10.11M
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Half-Life
Spy Arcade
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.20%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.296T
179.8G
136.3G
127.9G
71.35G
17.14G
5.443G
---
0.22%
0.05%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.819G
381.8M
657.3M
123.2M
125.0M
22.15M
10.06M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
38.36%
---
254.1T
---
36.37%
---
304.6G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
662.6T
---
100.00%
---
837.6G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 253.3G 0.28% 2.325G
IGMP[2]0.00% 43.95M 0.00% 1.233M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 175.1G 0.03% 234.1M
TCP[6]85.79% 568.4T 82.82% 693.6G
UDP[17]11.41% 75.58T 14.48% 121.2G
IPv6[41]0.00% 19.92G 0.01% 43.42M
GRE[47]2.16% 14.33T 1.75% 14.61G
ESP[50]0.53% 3.538T 0.61% 5.141G
AX.25[93]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
PIM[103]0.00% 3.769G 0.01% 43.77M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.04% 244.5G 0.03% 276.5M
Total100.00% 662.6T 100.00% 837.6G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.50% 322.4G
Medium (100-1400B)21.59% 180.8G
Large (1401-1500B)39.23% 328.6G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.68% 5.687G
Total100.00% 837.6G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.16% 637.2T 97.14% 813.6G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.03% 197.1G 0.04% 348.6M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 78.47G 0.02% 172.5M
Other3.79% 25.14T 2.80% 23.43G
Total100.00% 662.6T 100.00% 837.6G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.42% 2.766T 0.24% 2.030G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
500001.94% 12.87T 2.45% 20.54G
168001.71% 11.33T 1.86% 15.61G
21280.84% 5.550T 0.84% 7.036G
330010.68% 4.510T 0.36% 3.045G
19350.62% 4.079T 0.92% 7.715G