Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080804

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080804 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 45.71% of octets and 24.62% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.392M 1 10.08M
5 1.495M 5 10.50M
10 1.624M 12 11.10M
50 3.448M 58 18.29M
90 16.49M 59 52.95M
95 30.39M 59 74.70M
99 101.7M 59 177.4M
99.9 211.2M 59 851.4M
99.99 954.2M 111 1.540G
99.999 1.048G 121 3.678G
100 151.2G 121 4.507G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.73% 1.469G
Medium (100-1400B)8.90% 17.79G
Large (1401-1500B)90.13% 180.2G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.24% 484.9M
Total100.00% 200.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers30.86% 90.24T 31.73% 63.46G 34.83% 3.479M
Encrypted Traffic7.91% 23.12T 8.06% 16.12G 6.64% 663.3k
Advanced Apps6.94% 20.28T 6.99% 13.97G 8.65% 863.5k
Measurement4.43% 12.96T 3.83% 7.656G 2.08% 207.5k
File Sharing2.83% 8.279T 2.83% 5.666G 2.26% 226.1k
Misc0.55% 1.604T 0.57% 1.140G 0.82% 82.38k
Games0.18% 540.5G 0.19% 378.7M 0.24% 23.98k
Audio/Video0.10% 305.5G 0.11% 215.0M 0.21% 21.00k
Unidentified46.19% 135.0T 45.70% 91.40G 44.26% 4.421M
Total100.00% 292.4T 100.00% 200.0G 100.00% 9.988M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.107G900014ESNET [3428]Abilene [11537]Iperf
1.083G900015Abilene [11537]ESNET [3428]Iperf
734.9M150010Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
601.7M150049LBL [16]Abilene [11537]Iperf
182.2M138713NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
171.5M150019Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
171.3M150020NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
160.4M150010Merit [237]CERN1 [1297]Iperf
153.6M150016NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
131.8M150029NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.045G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]48181 -> 5101
1.031G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]35399 -> 5101
970.8M150013Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]40564 -> 10000
969.1M150012ESnet-East [291]Boston U [111]51187 -> 10000
912.7M150018Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]40528 -> 10000
900.3M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]35226 -> 5101
760.9M150010UCLA [52]Abilene [11537]1399 -> 3002
657.6M150015U Kansas [2496]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]1021 -> 988
330.5M900013NCSA [1224]TACCNET [32093]34423 -> 50000
318.2M150030Nat Lib Med [70]NCREN [81]50345 -> 53532

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 777.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers39.09% 250.0T 39.64% 322.0G
Encrypted Traffic6.45% 41.22T 7.08% 57.52G
Advanced Apps4.32% 27.63T 3.85% 31.28G
Measurement3.38% 21.63T 2.06% 16.77G
File Sharing2.92% 18.69T 3.04% 24.66G
Misc2.33% 14.92T 5.68% 46.15G
Audio/Video1.51% 9.673T 1.30% 10.59G
Games0.31% 1.963T 0.42% 3.386G
Unidentified39.69% 253.8T 36.92% 299.9G
Total100.00% 639.6T 100.00% 812.4G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
34.02%
1.88%
1.82%
1.37%
---
217.6T
12.03T
11.61T
8.768T
---
35.36%
1.53%
1.54%
1.21%
---
287.2G
12.44G
12.53G
9.807G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
3.99%
1.90%
0.55%
0.01%
0.00%
---
25.49T
12.13T
3.524T
75.36G
5.745G
---
3.78%
2.64%
0.64%
0.02%
0.00%
---
30.70G
21.40G
5.228G
151.9M
31.82M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
3.00%
0.81%
0.49%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.16T
5.168T
3.142T
96.17G
45.57G
9.810G
---
2.80%
0.63%
0.38%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
---
22.75G
5.096G
3.109G
96.95M
110.3M
115.9M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
3.34%
0.04%
0.00%
---
21.35T
277.6G
0.000
---
1.80%
0.27%
0.00%
---
14.60G
2.164G
0.000
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
FastTrack
Gnutella
WinMX
Carracho
Freenet
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.01%
0.93%
0.61%
0.27%
0.08%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.450T
5.937T
3.919T
1.703T
533.2G
63.24G
57.68G
18.54G
6.869G
3.133G
2.694G
469.5M
29.91M
---
0.82%
1.39%
0.45%
0.28%
0.07%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.667G
11.28G
3.632G
2.245G
562.8M
83.75M
117.1M
26.39M
9.651M
2.765M
33.57M
501.4k
44.00k
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
NFS
X11
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.43%
0.29%
0.23%
0.18%
0.07%
0.06%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.160T
1.882T
1.469T
1.131T
434.3G
379.9G
166.2G
57.89G
53.37G
50.50G
50.18G
39.13G
17.89G
12.30G
11.79G
8.680G
136.8M
---
2.93%
1.75%
0.32%
0.15%
0.05%
0.08%
0.06%
0.04%
0.09%
0.06%
0.08%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.77G
14.21G
2.636G
1.252G
419.7M
672.5M
501.7M
292.8M
697.8M
470.0M
655.3M
342.3M
61.91M
93.51M
55.82M
8.631M
1.531M
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
H.323 Signaling
Backbone Radio
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.07%
0.40%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.814T
2.555T
193.9G
52.31G
36.72G
10.67G
7.177G
2.776G
140.3M
---
0.67%
0.59%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.411G
4.771G
254.3M
62.84M
49.78M
16.86M
17.59M
6.684M
103.5k
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.21%
0.04%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.360T
239.7G
139.1G
120.5G
82.03G
15.74G
5.234G
---
0.24%
0.06%
0.02%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.961G
455.2M
139.4M
661.3M
136.7M
21.31M
11.04M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.69%
---
253.8T
---
36.92%
---
299.9G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
639.6T
---
100.00%
---
812.4G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 277.6G 0.27% 2.164G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.23M 0.00% 1.201M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 189.1G 0.03% 248.9M
TCP[6]90.40% 578.2T 87.17% 708.1G
UDP[17]8.04% 51.41T 11.05% 89.76G
IPv6[41]0.00% 12.78G 0.00% 32.67M
GRE[47]0.92% 5.894T 0.81% 6.593G
ESP[50]0.55% 3.524T 0.64% 5.228G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.598G 0.01% 41.37M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 79.19G 0.02% 160.1M
Total100.00% 639.6T 100.00% 812.4G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.38% 319.8G
Medium (100-1400B)19.95% 162.0G
Large (1401-1500B)40.59% 329.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.08% 653.7M
Total100.00% 812.4G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.69% 612.1T 96.72% 785.7G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.03% 203.5G 0.04% 365.5M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 24.62G 0.01% 112.8M
Other4.27% 27.34T 3.22% 26.16G
Total100.00% 639.6T 100.00% 812.4G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.52% 3.323T 0.30% 2.428G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
9881.56% 9.961T 0.92% 7.445G
10211.47% 9.408T 0.86% 6.991G
543211.45% 9.279T 1.10% 8.930G
21280.83% 5.318T 0.82% 6.638G
168000.78% 4.971T 0.81% 6.600G