Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080728

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080728 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 46.09% of octets and 25.51% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.390M 1 10.08M
5 1.484M 6 10.50M
10 1.602M 13 11.07M
50 3.455M 58 18.65M
90 16.08M 59 57.00M
95 27.47M 59 79.13M
99 98.02M 59 180.4M
99.9 181.1M 59 412.2M
99.99 857.1M 119 1.080G
99.999 1.037G 153 1.555G
100 187.2G 154 20.85G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.99% 2.033G
Medium (100-1400B)7.70% 15.79G
Large (1401-1500B)91.21% 187.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.09% 184.6M
Total100.00% 205.0G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers27.15% 80.69T 27.62% 56.63G 31.46% 3.200M
Encrypted Traffic9.40% 27.93T 9.62% 19.72G 7.01% 712.9k
Advanced Apps6.67% 19.82T 6.73% 13.80G 8.42% 857.1k
Measurement3.56% 10.59T 3.71% 7.615G 2.91% 296.3k
File Sharing3.00% 8.923T 2.98% 6.114G 2.42% 246.5k
Misc0.49% 1.470T 0.50% 1.034G 0.90% 91.80k
Games0.18% 521.7G 0.18% 361.8M 0.22% 22.51k
Audio/Video0.12% 349.5G 0.12% 244.2M 0.24% 24.45k
Unidentified49.42% 146.8T 48.53% 99.49G 46.41% 4.722M
Total100.00% 297.2T 100.00% 205.0G 100.00% 10.17M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
4.066G900013INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]Iperf
985.8M150022Boston U [111]ESnet-East [291]Iperf
841.6M150010Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
461.1M900014DFN-IP service G-WiN [680]INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]Iperf
363.9M150029UNIVHAWAII [6360]Unknown [25689]Iperf
213.1M150016NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
186.9M138911NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
168.5M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
160.8M150011Unknown [0]Abilene [11537]Iperf
153.8M150010Merit [237]CERN1 [1297]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.069G900010High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]48758 -> 5101
1.044G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]37812 -> 5101
972.4M150030CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]Hotline
961.3M150060Boston U [111]Unknown [32361]36747 -> 10000
960.2M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]60724 -> 5101
837.2M150054Unknown [0]APAN-JP [7660]Shoutcast
756.2M150020INDIANAGIGAPOP [19782]U Kansas [2496]40135 -> 9000
722.1M150028Science, Technology, and Research Transit Access Point [10764]CARIN-AS-BLOCK [7082]Hotline
365.8M137919SWITCH [559]PSC [1207]22250 -> 46981
299.9M150018Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]BT Customer services network [2611]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 803.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers37.59% 242.3T 39.01% 313.5G
Encrypted Traffic7.08% 45.63T 7.75% 62.31G
Advanced Apps4.12% 26.55T 3.73% 29.94G
File Sharing3.00% 19.34T 3.06% 24.57G
Misc2.39% 15.39T 5.77% 46.34G
Measurement1.87% 12.03T 1.41% 11.30G
Audio/Video1.50% 9.690T 1.33% 10.70G
Games0.28% 1.803T 0.39% 3.138G
Unidentified42.18% 271.9T 37.55% 301.7G
Total100.00% 644.8T 100.00% 803.6G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
32.69%
1.77%
1.71%
1.41%
---
210.8T
11.44T
11.01T
9.098T
---
34.82%
1.47%
1.49%
1.23%
---
279.8G
11.80G
11.99G
9.885G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.66%
1.94%
0.46%
0.01%
0.00%
---
30.07T
12.54T
2.944T
68.78G
5.476G
---
4.40%
2.76%
0.57%
0.02%
0.00%
---
35.33G
22.20G
4.599G
143.2M
30.79M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
IBP
McIDAS
BBCP
GsiFTP
BBFTP
---
2.86%
0.69%
0.53%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
18.46T
4.467T
3.427T
139.6G
37.43G
9.010G
---
2.66%
0.59%
0.43%
0.02%
0.01%
0.01%
---
21.41G
4.747G
3.435G
137.1M
100.9M
117.2M
File Sharing
Audiogalaxy
Shoutcast
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Freenet
Carracho
Blubster
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.10%
0.95%
0.58%
0.25%
0.09%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.079T
6.153T
3.766T
1.637T
553.1G
72.98G
61.59G
12.56G
4.129G
3.917G
3.450G
53.95M
38.24M
---
0.88%
1.39%
0.43%
0.25%
0.07%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.055G
11.13G
3.485G
2.014G
586.8M
149.4M
86.40M
15.35M
3.305M
6.349M
41.96M
126.2k
44.10k
Misc
Mail
Port 0
DNS
Squid
X11
NFS
AFS
IRC
NTP
Telnet
RTIP
MS Windows
SOCKS
SNMP
IDENT
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.35%
0.35%
0.29%
0.23%
0.06%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
8.726T
2.279T
1.885T
1.482T
373.9G
181.5G
179.4G
62.07G
52.02G
47.52G
43.05G
37.93G
20.55G
12.49G
6.728G
3.802G
163.3M
---
2.98%
0.23%
1.80%
0.32%
0.09%
0.03%
0.05%
0.04%
0.08%
0.05%
0.03%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
23.94G
1.810G
14.45G
2.534G
761.2M
248.7M
411.2M
324.7M
680.1M
431.6M
258.8M
239.9M
81.47M
98.91M
50.98M
8.047M
2.125M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
1.83%
0.04%
0.00%
---
11.79T
245.2G
0.000
---
1.17%
0.24%
0.00%
---
9.398G
1.903G
0.000
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.08%
0.38%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.949T
2.455T
162.9G
54.23G
42.00G
13.66G
9.403G
3.424G
57.76M
---
0.70%
0.58%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
5.649G
4.659G
234.8M
67.03M
50.27M
18.77M
22.98M
5.580M
42.60k
Games
DirectX
Spy Arcade
Battlenet
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.19%
0.03%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.204T
196.7G
177.7G
114.2G
95.39G
10.30G
4.034G
---
0.21%
0.02%
0.05%
0.08%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.716G
194.3M
394.1M
674.5M
135.2M
15.66M
8.457M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
42.18%
---
271.9T
---
37.55%
---
301.7G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
644.8T
---
100.00%
---
803.6G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.04% 245.2G 0.24% 1.903G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.41M 0.00% 1.192M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.03% 179.2G 0.03% 252.9M
TCP[6]91.12% 587.5T 88.11% 708.1G
UDP[17]7.63% 49.22T 10.34% 83.07G
IPv6[41]0.00% 11.38G 0.00% 29.06M
GRE[47]0.71% 4.596T 0.68% 5.487G
ESP[50]0.46% 2.944T 0.57% 4.599G
AX.25[93]0.00% 13.20k 0.00% 200.0
PIM[103]0.00% 3.426G 0.00% 38.72M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 68.91G 0.02% 144.8M
Total100.00% 644.8T 100.00% 803.6G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)38.32% 307.9G
Medium (100-1400B)18.67% 150.0G
Large (1401-1500B)42.97% 345.3G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.04% 314.6M
Total100.00% 803.6G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]96.22% 620.4T 96.94% 779.0G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.03% 170.2G 0.03% 259.4M
EF [DSCP=46]0.00% 30.93G 0.02% 124.7M
Other3.75% 24.17T 3.01% 24.22G
Total100.00% 644.8T 100.00% 803.6G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.54% 3.471T 0.32% 2.532G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
543212.20% 14.17T 1.75% 14.03G
330011.22% 7.846T 0.66% 5.264G
21280.89% 5.770T 0.90% 7.237G
200000.85% 5.473T 0.54% 4.346G
19350.81% 5.223T 1.04% 8.373G