Internet2 NetFlow: Weekly Reports: Week of 20080707

  1. Introduction
  2. Bulk TCP
  3. Full Data Set

Introduction

You are looking at the weekly Abilene network usage report for the week of 20080707 produced from NetFlow records. The view of the whole network as a single traffic-relaying unit is presented. More formally, data from all interior circuits (those connecting two Abilene routers) were discarded while all the rest of the data were merged to create this view.

During this week, there were no missing data days.

The data are split into two sections: bulk TCP data and the full data set. A "bulk TCP" flow is defined as a TCP flow that transferred more than 10MB of data. The first section only concerns these data. The second section studies the overall traffic composition.

All the numbers in this report are hyperlinked to plots that show their history (e.g., clicking on the percentage of octets of NNTP traffic will bring up a time-series plot that shows the history of this parameter).

Bulk TCP

During this week, bulk TCP traffic comprised 43.81% of octets and 23.63% of packets of the full data set traffic.

The distribution of bulk TCP throughputs is the most important piece of data in this report. Cumulative distribution function plots (1-CDF vs. throughput in bits/second) in semi-log and log-log scales are as follows:
[Bulk TCP throughputs (semi-log scale).] [Bulk TCP throughputs (log-log scale).]

Distribution of the amount of data transferred (in semi-log and log-log scale, 1-CDF vs. total trasfer size in octets) is presented below. It should be recognized that NetFlow collection mechanism is always configured so that flows (in the accounting sense) cannot last longer than a certain period of time. Therefore, the distribution of transfer sizes is to a certain extent skewed in the upper part.
[Bulk TCP transfer sizes (semi-log scale)] [Bulk TCP transfer sizes (log-log scale).]

The distribution of durations of bulk TCP flows (in seconds) is as follows (you may notice the cut-off phenomenon mentioned above):

[Bulk TCP durations distribution.]

The following table shows actual values from the above distribution plots that correspond to characteristic values (such as median, 90%, max, etc.).

Table 1. Selected Points from Distribution Graphs (Bulk TCPs)

Percentile Throughput (b/s) Durations (s) Size (octets)
1 1.391M 1 10.05M
5 1.491M 7 10.50M
10 1.621M 14 11.08M
50 3.410M 58 18.90M
90 16.35M 59 56.33M
95 28.85M 59 78.60M
99 81.03M 59 183.1M
99.9 169.4M 59 381.1M
99.99 931.9M 115 1.232G
99.999 1.026G 131 3.112G
100 5.800G 132 6.688G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of average sizes of packets belonging to bulk TCP flows is as follows:

Table 2. Packet Sizes (Bulk TCP)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)0.35% 635.3M
Medium (100-1400B)8.80% 16.09G
Large (1401-1500B)90.76% 166.0G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.10% 177.7M
Total100.00% 182.9G

We show what applications transfer large amounts of data in the following table. Note that this is bulk TCP traffic only; full data set usage is presented in the next section.

Table 3. Aggregated Application Types (Bulk TCP)

Traffic Type OctetsPacketsFlows
Data Transfers29.37% 78.45T 29.65% 54.25G 35.40% 3.235M
Encrypted Traffic9.59% 25.61T 9.88% 18.07G 7.56% 690.5k
Advanced Apps6.39% 17.05T 6.48% 11.85G 7.72% 705.3k
File Sharing3.10% 8.269T 3.09% 5.657G 2.24% 204.8k
Measurement0.91% 2.426T 0.95% 1.736G 0.16% 14.96k
Misc0.49% 1.307T 0.55% 1.009G 0.89% 81.34k
Games0.16% 422.8G 0.16% 297.4M 0.21% 18.83k
Audio/Video0.13% 342.6G 0.13% 241.5M 0.27% 24.47k
Unidentified49.87% 133.1T 49.11% 89.87G 45.55% 4.162M
Total100.00% 267.0T 100.00% 182.9G 100.00% 9.138M

The following are the fastest 10 measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown).

Table 4. Fastest Bulk TCP Measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
999.7M150012Brookhaven National Lab [43]Abilene [11537]Iperf
370.4M150040Merit [237]Abilene [11537]Iperf
212.3M150010NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]Israeli Academic and Research Network [378]Iperf
181.0M139729NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]APAN-JP [7660]Iperf
176.5M150010NASA GSFC [1701]Unknown [25689]Iperf
153.4M150030NASA GSFC [1701]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
130.9M150060IIJNET [2501]FR [2200]Iperf
126.2M147819Unknown [32361]SWITCH [559]Iperf
112.7M140818NASA-GSFC [1749]UT-Austin [18]Iperf
100.4M149510Indiana [87]TRANSPAC [22388]Iperf

The following are the fastest 10 non-measurement flows with unique source and destination AS numbers (i.e., for any given pair of source and destination AS numbers, no more than one fastest flow is shown). When unable to determine the application type, we give the source and destination port numbers.

Table 5. Fastest Bulk TCP Non-measurement Flows with Unique AS Source and Destination

Throughput (b/s)Packet size (bytes)Duration (s)Src ASDest ASApplication type
1.045G900010NASA-HPCC-ESS [7847]Abilene [11537]51717 -> 5101
1.037G899410High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]Abilene [11537]52778 -> 5101
575.0M900010Abilene [11537]High Performance Computing Modernization Program [668]44838 -> 5101
479.0M141118Unknown [32361]Unknown [36375]SSH
284.3M149760Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]U Texas, Arlington [18515]HTTP
282.1M150030NASA GSFC [1701]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
267.7M150010NOAA [6629]Unknown [27446]53675 -> 36191
265.3M150013NASA-ESDIS-NET [22767]AMPATH [20080]Hotline
262.1M142015NASA Internet [297]Pennsylvania State U [3999]Hotline
260.7M150034Network for Education and Research in Oregon [3701]UWATERLOO [12093]Rsync

We also compute the average concurrency of bulk TCP flows for the week (by adding durations of all captured flows and dividing the result by the by the duration of the week). This week's average number of concurrent bulk TCP flows: 719.0.

Full Data Set

In addition to bulk TCP flows data, we provide statistics that characterize the overall composition of the complete data set (everything that transited the Abilene network this week).

The following table describes what kinds of traffic went through the network (multiple applications are aggregated into classes):

Table 6. Aggregated Application Types (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers40.99% 249.9T 41.70% 322.9G
Encrypted Traffic7.14% 43.54T 7.73% 59.84G
Advanced Apps3.82% 23.31T 3.43% 26.53G
File Sharing3.44% 20.97T 3.56% 27.56G
Audio/Video2.45% 14.95T 1.55% 11.97G
Misc2.17% 13.20T 5.27% 40.79G
Measurement0.62% 3.787T 1.24% 9.580G
Games0.28% 1.690T 0.40% 3.068G
Unidentified39.08% 238.2T 35.13% 272.0G
Total100.00% 609.6T 100.00% 774.2G

This table is available additionally in the following more verbose version (no applications are aggregated into classes, but class composition is shown):

Table 7. Detailed Application Types (Full Data Set)

Traffic type OctetsPackets
Data Transfers
HTTP
Rsync
NNTP
FTP
---
36.87%
1.53%
1.34%
1.26%
---
224.7T
9.305T
8.158T
7.694T
---
38.15%
1.23%
1.17%
1.15%
---
295.3G
9.552G
9.045G
8.912G
Encrypted Traffic
SSH
HTTPS
IPsec ESP
IPsec AH
IPsec IKE
---
4.52%
2.20%
0.41%
0.01%
0.00%
---
27.52T
13.41T
2.515T
83.94G
5.604G
---
4.14%
3.04%
0.53%
0.02%
0.00%
---
32.06G
23.50G
4.078G
159.5M
30.56M
Advanced Apps
UNIDATA LDM
McIDAS
BBCP
BBFTP
GsiFTP
IBP
---
3.12%
0.65%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
---
19.01T
3.984T
219.4G
43.56G
40.70G
10.17G
---
2.83%
0.54%
0.03%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
---
21.90G
4.168G
219.5M
132.5M
96.34M
13.60M
File Sharing
Shoutcast
Audiogalaxy
Hotline
BitTorrent
eDonkey2000
Gnutella
FastTrack
WinMX
Blubster
Carracho
Freenet
Neo-Modus
Direct Connect++
---
1.48%
0.96%
0.62%
0.26%
0.10%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
9.013T
5.829T
3.760T
1.601T
579.1G
108.8G
63.08G
13.81G
4.122G
3.751G
1.278G
109.2M
5.415M
---
1.97%
0.75%
0.45%
0.25%
0.09%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
15.27G
5.820G
3.512G
1.902G
686.2M
184.8M
107.7M
22.24M
44.17M
7.001M
1.721M
221.2k
20.90k
Audio/Video
Any-Source Multicast
Real Player
Windows Media
Backbone Radio
H.323 Signaling
StreamWorks
Subset of VoIP
Camarades webcams
Single-Source Multicast
---
1.99%
0.42%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
12.13T
2.533T
157.6G
50.15G
38.25G
18.64G
11.87G
2.079G
0.000
---
0.86%
0.63%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
6.671G
4.883G
251.7M
68.34M
49.54M
20.03M
30.18M
3.906M
0.000
Misc
Mail
DNS
Squid
Port 0
X11
AFS
NFS
IRC
Telnet
NTP
MS Windows
RTIP
SOCKS
IDENT
SNMP
AOL AIM
RPC Portmapper
---
1.31%
0.25%
0.23%
0.19%
0.05%
0.04%
0.04%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
---
7.992T
1.550T
1.383T
1.159T
329.1G
269.0G
227.9G
56.99G
56.50G
52.54G
48.80G
32.78G
17.96G
15.95G
11.96G
2.582G
344.4M
---
2.69%
1.61%
0.32%
0.14%
0.09%
0.09%
0.04%
0.04%
0.06%
0.09%
0.04%
0.03%
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
20.85G
12.45G
2.515G
1.070G
705.3M
674.2M
310.6M
304.7M
469.3M
687.1M
281.8M
244.4M
54.50M
53.57M
92.34M
5.171M
9.131M
Measurement
Iperf
ICMP
IPMP
---
0.50%
0.13%
0.00%
---
3.024T
762.3G
0.000
---
0.40%
0.84%
0.00%
---
3.066G
6.513G
0.000
Games
DirectX
Battlenet
Spy Arcade
Half-Life
Quake
Starsiege Tribes
Asheron
---
0.19%
0.03%
0.02%
0.02%
0.01%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.165T
188.5G
122.7G
106.6G
83.93G
17.67G
5.803G
---
0.22%
0.05%
0.02%
0.09%
0.02%
0.00%
0.00%
---
1.685G
416.8M
116.4M
675.8M
138.8M
23.21M
11.31M
Unidentified
Unidentified
---
39.08%
---
238.2T
---
35.13%
---
272.0G
Total
Total
---
100.00%
---
609.6T
---
100.00%
---
774.2G

The following table summarizes use of most popular IPv4 protocols:

Table 8. IP Protocols Distribution (Full Data set)

Protocols OctetsPackets
ICMP[1]0.13% 762.3G 0.84% 6.513G
IGMP[2]0.00% 42.41M 0.00% 1.164M
IP-ENCAP[4]0.02% 143.0G 0.03% 212.0M
TCP[6]91.07% 555.1T 88.01% 681.4G
UDP[17]7.85% 47.87T 10.11% 78.30G
IPv6[41]0.00% 22.99G 0.01% 42.70M
GRE[47]0.49% 3.012T 0.46% 3.531G
ESP[50]0.41% 2.515T 0.53% 4.078G
AX.25[93]0.00% 6.600k 0.00% 100.0
PIM[103]0.00% 2.955G 0.00% 27.57M
IPMP[169]0.00% 0.000 0.00% 0.000
Other0.01% 84.24G 0.02% 162.1M
Total100.00% 609.6T 100.00% 774.2G

We compute average packet size of each flow by dividing the number of octets in a flow by the number of packets. Distribution of (average) packet sizes is as follows:

Table 9. Packet Sizes (Full Data Set)

Packet Size Packets
Small (<100B)39.77% 307.9G
Medium (100-1400B)19.53% 151.2G
Large (1401-1500B)40.53% 313.7G
Jumbo (>1500B)0.18% 1.357G
Total100.00% 774.2G

We only track DSCP values for which special treatment was defined by Internet2 QoS working group (and the default of DSCP=0):

Table 10. Important DSCP Values (Full Data Set)

Type OctetsPackets
Best effort [DSCP=0]95.83% 584.1T 96.86% 749.9G
Scavenger [DSCP=8]0.04% 215.1G 0.05% 351.2M
EF [DSCP=46]0.01% 41.17G 0.02% 138.8M
Other4.13% 25.15T 3.08% 23.81G
Total100.00% 609.6T 100.00% 774.2G

We collect statistics about ECN-capable traffic:

Table 11. ECN-Capable Traffic

Type OctetsPackets
ECN-Capable0.42% 2.553T 0.25% 1.921G

To facilitate detection of emerging applications, we present statistics about frequently encountered unidentified port numbers (no distinction is made in this table between TCP and UDP):

Table 12. Frequent Unidentified Ports

Port OctetsPackets
21280.95% 5.814T 0.98% 7.612G
19350.93% 5.649T 1.10% 8.553G
45000.41% 2.484T 0.42% 3.288G
150000.30% 1.831T 0.32% 2.471G
200000.30% 1.824T 0.23% 1.808G